ACCESS: Top Secret
- Aug 13, 2007
- Reaction score
thanks for that information, newsdeskdan
Hood said:But I wonder if this was the reason why the F-models dispensed with the wing cannon? It seems odd that if the same shockwave issue occurred with the MG FF that the fences were not looked into again.
sgeorges4 said:Any original drawing of the bf 109 S? I can't find the topic with those drawing,and I just want to know for wich version the wing was assigned(the F or the E?).
sgeorges4 said:Any official drawing regarding the me 155?
sienar said:Was the wing of the 155 like the redraws? Mid virtually straight spar with evenly tapered planform?
Blohm was really unhappy with the 1091 they were given. A key issue they identified was the spar location, which made the wing torsionally weak. Improving that was precluded as the landing gear meant a torsion box could not be built ahead of the spar, and the radiators in the trailing edge meant that the same could not be done aft of the spar either. They also identified problems with the fuselage and turbo installation, choosing to go for a tubular fuselage structure as this was much easier to design and rework when changes to the turbo occurred.
sgeorges4 said:Is this deisgn the blohm und voss 155 A?
The source is here: http://fighters.forumactif.com/t80349p500-luftwaffe-46-et-autres-projets-de-l-axe-a-toutes-les-echellesbf-109-g10-erla-luft46