Here are the lists (Multi post will update over time)

This is my list, if you require data on a specic design just ask.

Submarines:
Regular/Fleet Submarines:

DNC Design - 1915 (Likely related to the K-Class)
Vickers Design - 1915 (Likely related to the K-Class)
Vickers Export Design 831 for Argentina - 1921
Vickers Export Design 833 for Argentina - 1921
Vickers Export Design 851 for Argentina - 1921
Vickers Export Design 855 for Argentina - 1921/24
Vickers Export Design 1086 for Argentina - 1924
Vickers Export Design 1087 for Argentina - 1924
Vickers Export Design 1067 for China - 1934

Nuclear Submarines:
Dreadnought preliminary with 4 propellers in each quadrant - 1957?

Hunter-Killer Submarines:
Boreas Type/Class Design 1953 - 1955

Mine-Layer Submarines:
Vickers Export Design 783 for Argentina - 1920
Vickers Export Design 1084 for Argentina - 1924
Vickers Export Design 1087 for Argentina - 1924 (Different 1087 design)
Vickers Export Design 1068 for China - 1934

Cruiser Submarines:
Design 1916 - 1916
Design 1917 - 1916
Vickers Export Design 941 for Argentina - 1921
Oh hi tzoli, it is such an honor
Could you please provide me with information about Vickers export design 322a? Or tell me where can I research for it?
 
Could you please provide me with information about Vickers export design 322a? Or tell me where can I research for it?
"The British Battleship. 1906-1946" - Friedman, N. 2015.

---

Vickers offers to Argentina and China:
- 332 for Argentina "Design 332 therefore offered eight 13.5in and sixteen 6in, but no other details were given". Page 832.
- 332 for China "By 1906 the Chinese were planning to rebuild their fleet (...)." Page 347.
"An all-big-gun ship was apparently considered unaffordable. Vickers offered a series of designs, including an armoured cruiser, in
August 1907." Page 347.
"Designs were designated by letter. Design A was Vickers Design 325, armed with two twin 12in/45 and four single 92in/45 plus twelve 4in in ‘tween decks mountings and two submerged torpedo tubes on 10,000 tons (380ft x 69ft 6in x 22ft), with a speed of 19 knots (12,500 IHP). Belt thickness amidships was 8in. An alternative design offered at this time (330 ‘F’.) would have had similar dimensions but a 9in belt and an armament of four 12in/45 plus twenty-eight 4.7in/50 and two torpedo tubes. G (Design 331) had a secondary battery of sixteen 6in/50 and an 8in belt. H (Design 332) offered six 12in/45 and sixteen 4.7in/50 on much the same dimensions, with an 8in belt. Presumably in this design the 12in guns were in triple turrets (the Vickers notebook does not say so). K (Design 335) had two 12in and eight 9.2in plus twelve 4in and the two torpedo tubes. The armoured cruiser was Design B (326), armed with four 10in/45 and eighteen 6in in ‘tween deck mounts, plus four 14pdr and two submerged torpedo tubes on 8000 tons (400ft x 63ft x 21ft 6in), with a speed of 21 knots (14,000 IHP) and a 7in belt. C and D were protected cruisers; E (Design 329) was another armoured cruiser, in this case with four 9.2in and twelve 4in guns, also on 8000 tons. J was another protected cruiser. Vickers later offered smaller armoured and protected cruisers to China; none of them approached the battleship class." Page 851.

Ansaldo-Armstrong offers to Argentina incluided the 343mm (II gun per turret) and 305mm (III gun per turret) alternatives:
- B & B-Bis (291): main 15 (5xIII) 305/50 or 10 (5xII) 343/50, secondary 16 (16xI) 152/50, displacement 21,600 t, belt 229 mm, speed 21 ks.
- C & C-Bis (292): main 12 (4xIII) 305/50 or 8 (4xII) 343/50, secondary 12 (12xI) 152/50, displacement 21,400 t, belt 229 mm, speed 25 ks.
- D & D-Bis (293): main 18 (6xIII) 305/50 or 12 (6xII) 343/50, secondary ~16 (16xI) 152/50, displacement 23,100 t, belt ~229 mm, speed ~22 ks.

The Vickers Design 322 for Argentina is pretty similar to the Armstrong Design C (292) and both are an upgrade of the Vickers Design H/322 for China. The Wargaming Vickers Design 322A seems to be a based in the mentioned "H/322" with improved secondaries (152mm instead of 120mm) similar to the "322" and "C(292)".
Link https://shipblog.ca/blog/pan_asian_battleships

Regards
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom