Now some details about why many people think that RVV-AYe is the designation for the export variant of the original R-77/ Izd. 170. As wrote before ,RVV-AYe was the designation for the new medium-range AAM developed in 1982. Chief constructors in the GosMKB Vympel then were Vladimir Pustovoytov and Genadiy Sokolovsky. When flight tests started in 1984 ,that AAM got designation K-77 and from 1989 began serial production of the R-77. It was serialy produced only 200 R-77/ Izd 170 and in 1991 all of them together with production tools and other parts were transfered from Kyev's factory Artem to Moscow's factory GosMKB Vympel. After that ,they have been transferred to the Lipetsk-2 and Akhtubinsk air base to be operational with the MiG-29S/Izd 9.13S. Some sources mentioned that R-77 were also operational in the Shaykovka air base with 10 operational MiG-29S there from the Spring of 1992 in the 1st Aviation Sqn of the 73 Guards Fighter Aviaton Regiment but I have never found any pic with them. On Feb 1994, MiG-29S was officially entered in the RuAF together with the new short-range AAM type R-73M/ML and the new medium-range AAM type R-77.
As Vladimir Bogatsky used to say in many interviews, it was his idea to call R-77 as 'RVV-AYe'. V.Bogatsky was chief constructor in the Vympel throughout 90's and after 2000 . In fact ,RVV-AYe as 'designation' was used from 1990's and after 2000 almost on every MAKS and other international air shows as the commercial designation for the export version of the R-77 ,in the Vympel known as Izdeliye 190 or in the foreign air forces known as R-77E. Even in every Vympel's 'Annual Report' / 'Годовой отчет', in the last 20 years ( I have most of them) ,RVV-AYe designation is used as the export version of R-77. From 2008 e.g.
''Сегодня основными образцами продукции военного назначения,
предлагаемыми на экспорт, являются: УР класса «воздух-воздух» Р-73Э, РВВ-АЕ,
Р-27Р1 (Р-27ЭР1), Р-27Т1 (Р-27ЭТ1), Р-27П (Р-27ЭП), Р-33Э, УР класса «воздух-
поверхность» Х-29ТЕ, авиационное катапультное устройство АКУ-170Е,
устройство выброса пассивных помех УВ-30МК, балочные держатели: БД3-УСК-
А, БД3-УМК2, БД4-УСК-А, МБД3-У6-68, МБД3-У2Т-1 и др...''
The catch is in the Bogatsky's idea to 'call' it simply RVV-AYe like Mikhail Simonov used to designate some Sukhoi 's prototypes with its own 'numbers'. Su-39 for Su-25TM ( it was of course military designation), then Su-37 for the Su-27M ( miltiary designation) ,exactly for the T-10M-11 number 711 ,Su-47 for the S-37 etc.
Where is the problem then with that designation 'RVV-AYe' in the practical military terms? Simply when AAM type R-77/R-77E is attached on some fighter own or exported as radar guided missile ,there must be some digits/numbers in the so-called pairing/'litering' process between the on-board radar and the attached AAM.
When pilot e.g. during exercise,simulations or during the real combat situation ,choose to use R-77/R-77E, he will get designation '77' on his HUD. The same thing is for the newer Russian R-77-1 where many sources mention that export version is known as RVV-SD but the real military designation is simply R-77-1E ( EL) or with the laser proximity fuse only. RVV-SD is in fact only commercial designation for the Izdeliye 170-1/R-77-1 and its export variant. As we can see on many videos through Su-35S's type IKSh-1M HUD, there is '77-1' designation.
Sequencies from 18:30 and we can see '77' as designation for the R-77/E.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WiMHBxSp6f0&t=1108s
As Vladimir Bogatsky used to say in many interviews, it was his idea to call R-77 as 'RVV-AYe'. V.Bogatsky was chief constructor in the Vympel throughout 90's and after 2000 . In fact ,RVV-AYe as 'designation' was used from 1990's and after 2000 almost on every MAKS and other international air shows as the commercial designation for the export version of the R-77 ,in the Vympel known as Izdeliye 190 or in the foreign air forces known as R-77E. Even in every Vympel's 'Annual Report' / 'Годовой отчет', in the last 20 years ( I have most of them) ,RVV-AYe designation is used as the export version of R-77. From 2008 e.g.
''Сегодня основными образцами продукции военного назначения,
предлагаемыми на экспорт, являются: УР класса «воздух-воздух» Р-73Э, РВВ-АЕ,
Р-27Р1 (Р-27ЭР1), Р-27Т1 (Р-27ЭТ1), Р-27П (Р-27ЭП), Р-33Э, УР класса «воздух-
поверхность» Х-29ТЕ, авиационное катапультное устройство АКУ-170Е,
устройство выброса пассивных помех УВ-30МК, балочные держатели: БД3-УСК-
А, БД3-УМК2, БД4-УСК-А, МБД3-У6-68, МБД3-У2Т-1 и др...''
The catch is in the Bogatsky's idea to 'call' it simply RVV-AYe like Mikhail Simonov used to designate some Sukhoi 's prototypes with its own 'numbers'. Su-39 for Su-25TM ( it was of course military designation), then Su-37 for the Su-27M ( miltiary designation) ,exactly for the T-10M-11 number 711 ,Su-47 for the S-37 etc.
Where is the problem then with that designation 'RVV-AYe' in the practical military terms? Simply when AAM type R-77/R-77E is attached on some fighter own or exported as radar guided missile ,there must be some digits/numbers in the so-called pairing/'litering' process between the on-board radar and the attached AAM.
When pilot e.g. during exercise,simulations or during the real combat situation ,choose to use R-77/R-77E, he will get designation '77' on his HUD. The same thing is for the newer Russian R-77-1 where many sources mention that export version is known as RVV-SD but the real military designation is simply R-77-1E ( EL) or with the laser proximity fuse only. RVV-SD is in fact only commercial designation for the Izdeliye 170-1/R-77-1 and its export variant. As we can see on many videos through Su-35S's type IKSh-1M HUD, there is '77-1' designation.
Sequencies from 18:30 and we can see '77' as designation for the R-77/E.
Last edited:
