"R-77M" is likely R-97 in the first place.
It can be 810, but hard to tell.
Hm ,R-77M is one type of the AAM and R-97 or Izd 810 is one completely different type of AAM ( very long range btw ).
"R-77M" is likely R-97 in the first place.
It can be 810, but hard to tell.
Range head on in a known R-97 screenshot would match double pulse MRAAM better than next generation LRAAM.Hm ,R-77M is one type of the AAM and R-97 or Izd 810 is one completely different type of AAM ( very long range btw ).
So when will the R-97 or Izd 810 enter full rate production Squirrel? It has been a few years since I have heard anything about this missile.
Range head on in a known R-97 screenshot would match double pulse MRAAM better than next generation LRAAM.
Yes, thick, hi-hi optimized missile can simply be that bad from low altitude launch, but simpler answer is 97 is the missile we already know.
Lmao at the creator of the video trying to smuggle in the AIM-120 as being somehow comparable to the Meteor, R-77M or PL-15.
That is a lazy cheap shot, the PL-15 hasn't been used in combat (I'll stand corrected if it has) and I don't know if the latest AA-12 Adder variant has been used yet.
Almost certain...
But... the weird thing is, even though this photo has been online for at least five years, I still can't find any patent documents related to it...
But... uh... I found a similar design...View attachment 782677View attachment 782676
What is it?
missiles.ru
Yeah, It‘s a SAM,not a AAMIts a SAM, so not sure of relevance to topic.
That was taken near Moscow. What combat Mission? What’s R-87?Looks like 02 might have lunched an R-37 and R-87 during that mission (assuming it was returning from a combat mission).
amazing deduction, I wonder what other designation you could invent this way?You see '97' designation on Su-57 sim HUD in 'Military Acceptance' TV show and assume that "This should be Izd.810. Well, then how do we call a development of R-77. Let's call it R-87. Why not? Voila!"
Looks like 02 might have lunched an R-37 and R-87 during that mission (assuming it was returning from a combat mission).
Designation, huh? You can invent whole new missile - "Izd.270"amazing deduction, I wonder what other designation you could invent this way?
Designation, huh? You can invent whole new missile - "Izd.270"
I'm talking of this https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/th...ukrainian-aam-projects.283/page-3#post-732565Invented 15 years ago ....
I didn't knew of K-28 until now, fascinating. Are there other such interesting articles on nevskii-bastion for missiles in the 1980s-1990s period, or even better an index of AAMs covered?
PS: well i can't seem to be able to access articles such as R-77 which is a bummer.
You are stubbornly bring here a myth that missile sub-assembly with red technological spacer in the place of motor section (and that has even no fcuking nozzle) is a 'new missile designated izd.270 based on 170/170-1/180 whatever"Yes ,that was my post. As a MCM follower for several years now, I remember that some members there commented on the new AAM for the Su-57 that was presented to the Moscow's Mayor Sergey Sobyanin.It happened on 18. Nov. 2019 ( 70th Anniversary of the GosMKB Vympel).
You are stubbornly bring here a myth that missile sub-assembly with red technological spacer in the place of motor section (and that has even no fcuking nozzle) is a 'new missile designated izd.270 based on 170/170-1/180 whatever"
You was told several times that this is BS.
You are living in some alternate universe, where logic is absent. Surely this is 'IZDELIYE 270' full of stencils in English.
Enough for me.
Squirell, I’m fairly sure those are just unfinished R-77-1…
Notched wing R-77-1 is definitely one for some kind of static or vibration testing, the windows in the wing are used for attachment of sensors