• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

Eurofighter Typhoon

Jackonicko

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
Feb 4, 2009
Messages
62
Reaction score
30

ferpe

ACCESS: Restricted
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2020
Messages
15
Reaction score
29

There's more on Radar Two at:
View: https://www.facebook.com/aerospaceanalysis/posts/1550084768531009?__tn__=K-R

When you read through the Facebook content you realize ECRS mk 2 has more to do with Raven-05 (Vixen 1000 outside the Gripen) than the Captor heritage. Captor was developed in the 1990ies when AD technology forced the A to D rather far back in the receiver/exciter chain (several IFs down). Raven was developed over the last 10 years and is well-described technology-wise in Stimson's Intro to Airborne Radar. Most examples of modern design radars with AD and DA close to the antenna is from Selex's (now Leonardo's) work with the Raven in Edinburgh.
It all builds on high dynamic range ADs that have bitrates of several GHz. This gives many advantages and ECRS is therefore wisely a further developed Raven rather than bogged down by 25-year-old design decisions from Captor. One example is the antenna. Rather than keeping the double swashplate to keep the integrated IFF polarization vertical, ECRS goes the Raven way with one rotation join (the polarization follows the rotation) and puts IFF separate like the Gripen (a Leonardo phased array design with >200° coverage like the radar/EW).

Gives much higher flexibility with nulling of the antenna vs jammers by both AESA nulling but also polarization mismatch and it's necessary for the ESM and Jammer modes (you can't have a one polarisation EW system). Once you put the ADs closer to the antenna you need a completely redone system downstream because of higher bitrates and compute needs. All angle, puls coding, doppler, and range gate processing is now digital. Same with the exciter (radar modes) and techniques generator (EW modes) going out with D to A just before the TRMs.

Only when you are down to metadata, hits/tracks, etc, and the reception of commands can you interface the legacy tactical computer of the Typhoon.

Regarding the hybrid GaS/GaN TRMs, I would venture GaS output power amps still, mainly for cost reasons, paired with GaN switching out/in (you don't want a circulator in a wideband MFA) followed by limiter free GaN first stage amp setting the NF (you gain the limiter losses in NF in addition to the low NF of GaN amps). You gain more in NF for the receive chain than what a few dBm on the output side buys you. Modern radars are about range through high AESA gain = narrow lobes and low sidelobes and sensitive receive chains, rather than screaming you are there with high output power. It's all about LPI (Low Probability of Intercept) radar modes = throttling your output power down as far as possible sending very long, low peak power, coded pulses.
 
Last edited:

Flyaway

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2015
Messages
4,873
Reaction score
2,673

Arjen

It's turtles all the way down
Senior Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2010
Messages
2,762
Reaction score
572
I have to admit I skipped the F-35 diatribe and concentrated on the AT's reporting on German politics
 

FighterJock

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Oct 29, 2007
Messages
1,694
Reaction score
430

Jackonicko

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
Feb 4, 2009
Messages
62
Reaction score
30
A recent publicity video released by the Royal Air Force of Oman (RAFO) showed Omani Typhoons practising the air-to-ground role. Perhaps surprisingly, the Omani aircraft were shown dropping what appeared to be 2,000-lb GBU-10 LGBs - a weapon cleared for use on Typhoon back in 2006-7, and part of the P1Eb software release, but not in use by the British Royal Air Force, or indeed by any of the original partner nations.

More at:
View: https://www.facebook.com/aerospaceanalysis/posts/1607021312837354



EFT RAFO 218 w PWII Screenshot 2020-11-16 at 20.32.52.png
 

DWG

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Feb 11, 2007
Messages
770
Reaction score
505
God knows how people coped in the 1950s and 60s when pilots used to do sonic booms for fun.
I certainly remember complaints in the late 70s when an F-111 went supersonic over Weardale, which was a fast jet route, but not a supersonic one.
 

Similar threads

Top