• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

Vickers 'Victory' & 'Jet' Bombers

danielgrimes

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
Oct 8, 2007
Messages
57
Reaction score
2
Hi, I'm looking for some info (line drawings, specifications) on the Vickers Victory and jet bomber designs of late WW2. The victory was a 6 engined evolution of the Wellington and the 'Jet Bomber' was the intermediate stage on getting to the Valiant. I already have some very high level info, but some of it contradicts itself, so any more info would be appreciated.

thanks
 

LowObservable

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2006
Messages
2,211
Reaction score
173
The Victory bomber (if the accounts by Paul Brickhill in The Dam Busters are to be believed) was a parametric study by Barnes Wallis aimed at creating a bomber that could drop a 10-ton Grand Slam from 40,000 feet.
If I was to guess, I would say that the technology from the study probably emerged in the Vickers 432 high-altitude fighter (two Merlin 60s) and the Windsor bomber (four Merlin 60s), which would suggest that the Victory was designed around six Merlin 60s. That would make sense since the Merlin 60 was studied from early 1940 onwards as a high-altitude engine, only later being used as a performance booster for the Spitfire IX and P-51B.
 

PMN1

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2006
Messages
793
Reaction score
231
Info and a model here

http://www.tgplanes.com/Public/snitz/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=639&whichpage=1&SearchTerms=Victory%2CBomber
 

alertken

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Jan 20, 2007
Messages
613
Reaction score
214
"75/100-ton" bombers 3-views: Andrews/Morgan,Vickers A/C,Putnam, P.563; Buttler/BSP III, P.125 - Merlin 60, early-1942, morphing late-1942 into Centaurus.
.
PMN1 thanks for link to Canadian nuclear timeline. No conspiracy over Windsor, initiated July,1942, 300 ordered June,1943 for Tiger Force, SE.Asia. V-A, favoured with this project, over the 3 Heavy firms, stuffed what had been sought since 1938 as the "Ideal Bomber", embarrassing Portal and Churchill. He had pressed for RAF participation v.Japan, unwanted by MacArthur, militarily (trouble enough co-ordinating USMC/USN/USArmy; Limeys and their ilk = distraction), or FDR politically ("US not fighting to restore colonialism"). Lincoln scrabbled as second-best. Windsor funding continued after VJ Day, Clyde/Theseus and Brabazon Type III, until all chopped Jan.1946. No link beween MAP (or USAAF) procurers and Manhattan team, who had to package their product into B-29/B-32.
 

PMN1

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2006
Messages
793
Reaction score
231
British Secret Projects notes 'In 1937 Vickers produced a scheme for an aircraft of 180,000lb, (80,648kg) all-up-weight and fitted with wings 7ft (2.1m) deep which carried all of its load in the wings. It was primarily intended to be a passenger carrier operating at 'normal' altitudes but a bomber variant was also shown. By July 1940 the scheme had become a high-altitude aircraft which had wings of normal depth with the bomb load transferred to the fuselage, and in November the proposals were submitted to Lord Beaverbrook. The first descriptive brochure was completed in January 1941 and forwarded to MAP and other officials'.

Does anyone have any details on the first design with 7ft deep wings?

How close to the 'Victory bomber' was the July 1940 design?
 

PMN1

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2006
Messages
793
Reaction score
231
The aircraft was six engined (Merlins), if there had been a reliable Sabre, Vulture or other engine in their class, could the 6 Merlins have been replaced by 4 of the larger engines and if so would there be any benefit apart from less maintenance (assuming the replacement engines are reliable).
 

fredgell

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
Jun 10, 2007
Messages
75
Reaction score
7
Haven't seen anyone point this out - but a rather nice wind tunnel model of the Vickers 'Victory Bomber'
seems to have turned up at Brooklands

Can see it on the web at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:BrooklandsVictoryBomber.jpg

It seems to have been there a while so this may be old news.

Regards

Fred
 

JFC Fuller

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2012
Messages
2,600
Reaction score
982
Please correct me if I am wrong but didnt the Windsor have structural issues?
 

royabulgaf

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Dec 29, 2008
Messages
511
Reaction score
88
Please correct me if I am wrong but didnt the Windsor have structural issues?

Yes. It was a continuation of the Wellington/Warwick geoditic structure, with the usual fabric cover. This disn't work well at the high speeds the Windsor flew at, and they experimented with different types of fabric, included metal reinforced (imagine a radial tire ) fabric. With the end of the war and much superior aircraft on the horizon, it just sort of faded away.
 

Vietcong

Avation Enthusiast from VN
Joined
Jan 11, 2010
Messages
76
Reaction score
4
Website
aviationprojects.blogspot.com
Can anyone have the 3 views or sketch of the Victory bomber?I just know that It was made by the British designer Barnes Wallis used to drop the earth quake bomb on Germany but it wasn't go further than windtunnel model.
 

Attachments

  • 800px-BrooklandsVictoryBomber.jpg
    800px-BrooklandsVictoryBomber.jpg
    141.6 KB · Views: 630

ChuckAnderson

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
May 11, 2006
Messages
187
Reaction score
18
Hi VC!!!

Will this 3-view be all right?

Chuck

SOURCE:
Vickers Aircraft Since 1908
By: C.F. Andrews and E.B. Morgan
pg. 562
Putnam Aeronautical Books
 

Attachments

  • VickersVictory.JPG
    VickersVictory.JPG
    55.3 KB · Views: 705

BillRo

ACCESS: Confidential
Senior Member
Joined
May 12, 2008
Messages
199
Reaction score
177
Had to go to the UK on a (automotive) research project and looked in at Brooklands. Here are updated pix of the display, new info, and the 3-View they have added.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3706 VBomb1LoRes.jpg
    IMG_3706 VBomb1LoRes.jpg
    101.7 KB · Views: 459
  • IMG_3707 VBomb2LoRes.jpg
    IMG_3707 VBomb2LoRes.jpg
    71.9 KB · Views: 442
  • IMG_3708 VBomb3LoRes.jpg
    IMG_3708 VBomb3LoRes.jpg
    115.2 KB · Views: 436

Similar threads

Top