McDonnell-Douglas F-15 Projects

The same day F-15EX first flew, QA 006 flew and QA 008 flew for the first time and without CFTs, only the second time a QA has flown without them. Was supposed to go do M2.3 - on a first flight! The departures were special - gear up, hold it low to the end of the runway then pitch up into a Viking departure right on top of us (had my 16 year old son with me - he was enthralled!). That's when you feel noise!

Enjoy the Day! Mark
 

Attachments

  • zMG_0024.jpg
    zMG_0024.jpg
    537.9 KB · Views: 636
  • zMG_0046.jpg
    zMG_0046.jpg
    402.7 KB · Views: 363
  • zMG_0103.jpg
    zMG_0103.jpg
    250.9 KB · Views: 325
  • zMG_0106.jpg
    zMG_0106.jpg
    228.3 KB · Views: 299
  • zMG_0141.jpg
    zMG_0141.jpg
    257.5 KB · Views: 315
  • zMG_0146.jpg
    zMG_0146.jpg
    245.4 KB · Views: 408
In that last citation there is a reference for a Westinghouse PESA for the F-15. I’m not familiar enough with the F-15 to know if they ever used block numbers or if the author meant F-16. The document is from 1994 so I assume apg-63(v)2 had at least begun development.
 

Attachments

  • 9A75A612-26BD-4EBA-BD23-3EDA08D7D979.png
    9A75A612-26BD-4EBA-BD23-3EDA08D7D979.png
    363.6 KB · Views: 434
In that last citation there is a reference for a Westinghouse PESA for the F-15. I’m not familiar enough with the F-15 to know if they ever used block numbers or if the author meant F-16. The document is from 1994 so I assume apg-63(v)2 had at least begun development.
Its a typo.

There is no Block 50 F-15 but there is a block 50 F-16.
 
I'm curious, was there ever a study done on how much it would cost to turn the stol f-15 into a production aircraft.
 
In "Tailless Vectored Fighters: Theory, Laboratory, and Flight Tests" (ADA317838 , https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA317838.pdf) there is a tailless F-15 wind tunnel model depicted that is (probably) an extension of some earlier efforts towards a reduced signature F-15 configuration.

F15Tailless.png
 
Do we have any idea of what the number of fighters requirement were for the f-15 before the f-16 came onto the scene?
 

F-15 Global Strike Eagle​



In 2006, Boeing proposed a similar concept for missile launch, this time using an unmanned variant of the F-15E Strike Eagle with the launch vehicle mounted dorsally instead of ventrally. Boeing designated this variant as the F-15 Global Strike Eagle (GSE). The concept proposed the F-15 GSE as a low-cost demonstration of global strike capability utilizing a variety of munitions including the little-known Common Aero Vehicle (CAV). Defined as a maneuverable, hypersonic reentry vehicle that has the capability of dispensing a variety of payloads inside the atmosphere, the CAV concept eventually merged with the Air Force/DARPA Falcon project. Providing a Low Earth Orbit (LEO) launch capability for micro satellites, or microsats, was another mission possibility for the F-15 GSE and, with future upgrades, delivering heavier ballistic and orbital payloads.

230118-F-JT962-10121.jpg



Screenshot-2023-01-20-at-10-34-16-F-15-Global-Stike-Eagle-FLASHBACK_F-15-GSE.PDF-500x274.png
 
Do we have any idea of what the number of fighters requirement were for the f-15 before the f-16 came onto the scene?
That's an intreging question Cjc!!
I look forward to the answer.


Regards
Pioneer
 
Do we have any idea of what the number of fighters requirement were for the f-15 before the f-16 came onto the scene?
That's an intreging question Cjc!!
I look forward to the answer.


Regards
Pioneer

Early F-X studies were made on a 1000 fighters figure (as in 1963 and 1968).
First detailed chart I've found is from 1969 (3rd picture) at 749 airframe.

Source: https://media.defense.gov/2012/May/16/2001330012/-1/-1/0/AFD-120516-036.pdf
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20230121_194519_Drive.jpg
    Screenshot_20230121_194519_Drive.jpg
    71.8 KB · Views: 153
  • Screenshot_20230121_194751_Drive.jpg
    Screenshot_20230121_194751_Drive.jpg
    100.4 KB · Views: 126
  • Screenshot_20230121_195334_Drive.jpg
    Screenshot_20230121_195334_Drive.jpg
    108.6 KB · Views: 245
Single seater with wingtip missile launchers and an extended wing span?

What is the vintage of this proposal? Any details?

1990. Extended wing, supercruise, ATF engines and avionics.

Edit: Composite wing, span 48ft 5in for area of 670 sq ft. Swept at 38.5 deg, leading edge slats introduced. Fuel capacity increased by 3,000lb to 16,257lb. Some front-quadrant RCS reduction.

The Senate reportedly added $100 million of long-lead funding for the F-15 program to the 1991 USAF budget "to protect the option of the F-15XX", according to Flight ( and AvWeek ) from July 1990. Seems an enormous amount of money.
 

Attachments

  • AvWeek_19900219_010.JPEG
    AvWeek_19900219_010.JPEG
    610.3 KB · Views: 224
  • AvWeek_19900723_014.JPEG
    AvWeek_19900723_014.JPEG
    101.9 KB · Views: 298
Last edited:

This looks like a tailless F-15 being tested at the radar range mentioned here:

 
That looks like the F-15 SMTD concept but with only the thrust reversing portion. No TVC.
 
And no canard neither. It must be a very early rendering.
The painting was later updated with the nozzles and foreplanes, as in this vintage brochure, randomly seen on Evil-bay.
Link if anyone wants it: https://www.ebay.com/itm/115727907080
 

Attachments

  • s-l1600.jpg
    s-l1600.jpg
    660.6 KB · Views: 66
  • Screenshot_20240324_085148_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20240324_085148_Chrome.jpg
    595.3 KB · Views: 67

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom