Intracluster light is already abundant at redshift beyond unity

Abstract
Intracluster light (ICL) is diffuse light from stars that are gravitationally bound not to individual member galaxies, but to the halo of galaxy clusters. Leading theories1,2 predict that the ICL fraction, defined by the ratio of the ICL to the total light, rapidly decreases with increasing redshift, to the level of a few per cent at z > 1. However, observational studies have remained inconclusive about the fraction beyond redshift unity because, to date, only two clusters in this redshift regime have been investigated. One shows a much lower fraction than the mean value at low redshift3, whereas the other possesses a fraction similar to the low-redshift value4. Here we report an ICL study of ten galaxy clusters at 1 ≲ z ≲ 2 based on deep infrared imaging data. Contrary to the leading theories, our study finds that ICL is already abundant at z ≳ 1, with a mean ICL fraction of approximately 17%. Moreover, no significant correlation between cluster mass and ICL fraction or between ICL colour and cluster-centric radius is observed. Our findings suggest that gradual stripping can no longer be the dominant mechanism of ICL formation. Instead, our study supports the scenario wherein the dominant ICL production occurs in tandem with the formation and growth of the brightest cluster galaxies and/or through the accretion of preprocessed stray stars.


 
According to this interview it sounds like the plan is to build a structure that would allow Dragon to dock to Hubble and would remain attached after the orbital boost is completed and would provide backup for the gyros etc, sort of like a Mission Extension Vehicle, an EVA would be required to make power and data connections.

 
That is a good idea Flyaway, using Dragon to dock with Hubble and possibly boost the HST to a higher altitude thus preventing the deorbiting and thus extending the mission.
 
The NSF had an artist's conception with the Dragon trunk backed up to Hubble...to avoid nose cap problems.
 
That is a good idea Flyaway, using Dragon to dock with Hubble and possibly boost the HST to a higher altitude thus preventing the deorbiting and thus extending the mission.
Make sense. Without a Shuttle payload bay "tool shed" they can't rummage through Hubble guts as done from 1993 to 2009.
Better to dock a "support module" with gyros and all that is needed to extend Hubble life once again.
Then rinse, repeat every ten years ? Starship may help someday, perhaps providing a new " space tool shed" similar to the Shuttle's in the past.
 
That is a good idea Flyaway, using Dragon to dock with Hubble and possibly boost the HST to a higher altitude thus preventing the deorbiting and thus extending the mission.
Dragon is not a good vehicle for that. Thruster placement is bad. NG's MEV is a better solution.
 
Have you got any photo's or links available Byeman? Just so that I can see the differences between the two?
 
Dragon is not a good vehicle for that. Thruster placement is bad.
The issue is that Crew Dragon has to dock with trunk first on Hubble, to raise it orbit with it thruster.
Now this make EVA easy, but needed spare part are in trunk.

NG's MEV is a better solution.
Better know as Mission Extension Vehicle
Those are build for GEO satellites, not bus size space Telescope with 11600kg mass
you could modified the MEV for this task
but it not open Hubble and replace parts, that Astronaut task

what about compromise ?

a Modified MEV dock on Hubble, were later Drew Dragon dock on for EVA operation.
 
More gyroscope issues for Hubble.

View: https://twitter.com/nasahubble/status/1729977637961916738


NASA is working to resume science operations of the Hubble Space Telescope after it entered safe mode Nov. 23 due to an ongoing gyroscope issue. Hubble’s instruments are stable, and the telescope is in good health:

 
Old age creeping up on Hubble Flyaway? Yet another issue with the Gyroscopes and it has not been that long since the last similar issue.
 
Old age creeping up on Hubble Flyaway? Yet another issue with the Gyroscopes and it has not been that long since the last similar issue.

Isn’t Hubble a couple decades past its mission life? Or at least its last servicing?
 
I suppose that Hubble should have been deorbited last year Josh_TN, but with all the science that Hubble has done currently and in the past NASA has for now had a change of heart on the HST and decided that it is more worth while that it can continue along side the JWST for now.
 
I suppose that Hubble should have been deorbited last year Josh_TN, but with all the science that Hubble has done currently and in the past NASA has for now had a change of heart on the HST and decided that it is more worth while that it can continue along side the JWST for now.

I'm all for running it as long as it continues to work, but I was in middle school when it was launched!
 
Same here Josh_TN, just as long as no more Gyroscopes fail then Hubble should be okay to carry on.
 
NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope to Resume Science Operations Soon

Updated, Dec. 7, 2023
NASA plans to restore the agency’s Hubble Space Telescope to science operations Friday, Dec. 8, following a series of tests to gain insight into the gyro performance that caused the spacecraft to pause science operations last week.

After analyzing the data, the team has determined science operations can resume under three-gyro control. Based on the performance observed during the tests, the team has decided to operate the gyros in a higher-precision mode during science observations. Hubble’s instruments and the observatory itself remain stable and in good health. [/quote]

 
Back into safe mode again, same gyro as last November causing issues again.

 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom