Welshy42

ACCESS: Restricted
Joined
2 January 2024
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Good evening people!

Once again, I am flummoxed as to how secret our projects can or can't be !?!

I have just became the proud owner of Aerocraft Models (I must add for the sake of conformity, that other Model Brands are available), Fairey Tactical Strike Aircraft GOR.339 Project 75.

Now, whilst meandering over the kit, I noted the decals are either for a "Hi-Viz" or "Lo-Viz" aircraft. Knowing what I know so far about this aircraft (and it's rich non-history), leads me to know the actual sum total of diddly squat. I am either directed to the TSR2 (which obviously was it's far better non-successor), or back to Aerocraft Models, telling me the kit is available!!!

Now, apart from a small paragraph with some words stating Fairey had something down on paper on their Drawing Board - but it was rejected from the off, I can live with. If this becomes a what-if model I can also live with, what I cannot live with however, is that they have provided 2 sets of serials; either XR75(0-9) or XS24(0-9).

XR serials relate to the EE Lightning fleet and XS were mostly Folland Gnat then Andovers etc.

To do this aircraft true justice I need some slice of heaven with the perfect information needed to give it a home and a serial it can rest with. If the Air Ministry / Ministry of Aviation never subscribed the use of RAF Serials then both I (and a similarly-named model company mentioned earlier), are up the proverbial shizz creek without it's paddle! :)

Over to you and Good Luck!
 
Well, as a GOR.339 design, it would obviously replace the actually built TSR.2. So I'd reuse any previous serial numbers from that program. But I am not a serial number expert :)

The sum total of published information on the design is really in Damian Burke's TSR2 book for Crowood, which has drawings from the brochure and an artist's impression.
 
Last edited:
fairey-gor-339-1-jpg.540655



pb117028-jpg.531552



fairey-gor-339-jpg.56400


 
The Fairey didn't meet the requirements for GOR.339. It ignored the supersonic mission requirements. So it's a bit hard to see a scenario where it got built.
 
My photos from RAF Museum Stores, Stafford.
 

Attachments

  • Stafford2 057.jpg
    Stafford2 057.jpg
    545.3 KB · Views: 36
  • Stafford2 058.jpg
    Stafford2 058.jpg
    635.1 KB · Views: 31
  • Stafford2 059.jpg
    Stafford2 059.jpg
    652.7 KB · Views: 30
  • Stafford2 060.jpg
    Stafford2 060.jpg
    588.6 KB · Views: 30
  • Stafford2 062.jpg
    Stafford2 062.jpg
    647 KB · Views: 27
  • Stafford2 063.jpg
    Stafford2 063.jpg
    521.6 KB · Views: 34
It could fly supersonically to Mach 2, but the mission had hard requirements for a Mach 2 dash as part of the 1000nm mission. Fairey couldn't get a design which could meet this and the range requirement and so their mission profile didn't include the supersonic dash.
 
It could fly supersonically to Mach 2, but the mission had hard requirements for a Mach 2 dash as part of the 1000nm mission. Fairey couldn't get a design which could meet this and the range requirement and so their mission profile didn't include the supersonic dash.
To be fair to Fairey, the TSR.2 couldn't meet the requirements either :D
 
Paul, very many thanks for clearing up the mystery for me - I can safely get on with this kit now knowing that it had a home (of sorts) and a serial number to boot!

Rgds,

Eric
 
Hi!
 

Attachments

  • 134260206_3684664874906002_4148216803627954786_n.jpg
    134260206_3684664874906002_4148216803627954786_n.jpg
    184 KB · Views: 22
Back
Top Bottom