I heard it was just the institute's own project. If this is just to prove that you are capable of developing vertical take-off and landing aircraft yourself, as a technical preparation, will it be applied to the next generation of fighter jets?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I've heard this is just a project for the research institute itself. If it's merely to demonstrate your ability to develop a vertical takeoff and landing aircraft as a technological preparation, will it be applied to the next generation of fighter jets?
For pure research without practical implications, this is expensive and not very useful. I.e. there's some overflow of data into normal jet CTOL performance, but you may as well make a simpler demonstrator just for that alone.

The files @Tomboy mentions are a massive effort, it is a very expensive program, run in a place(Guizhou) that will require a significant investment to make it possible.
 
What are the odds, that what we're looking here is not a fan, as people are saying here, but a compressor (stator blades not depicted)?
In which case this hypothetical engine would be using reheat, with a large expansion nozzle, tuned for sea level and and low velocity (large expansion nozzle) . This would control the heat, help with hot gas reingestion, and the clutch and parasitic power drain on the main engine would be much lower than F-35B, which means the plane can fly with a much less powerful engine.

Afair, Hawker's proposed successor to the Harrier would've used a similar system.
 
RAAF F-35s are A models.
My point was obviously broader than just the RAAF birds -- this whole episode at least gives some credence to those earlier rumors, i.e., something must have clearly happened. But your take is valid too...

And besides the counter-rotating lift fan and the different nozzles, most of the F135 engine is still the same.

As for “F-35 parts ending up in Hong Kong” that’s obviously a pretty vague way of describing what actually happened. The report specifically mentions a canopy, but you can bet that a good chunk of those other components are going to be engine-related.

And before the inevitable “Chyna copied muh engine” takes start rolling in again, the US would obviously do the exact same thing -- analyze/study and squeeze every bit of technical intelligence out of it -- if it got its hands on an adversary’s hardware.

View: https://x.com/stray_helium/status/1999010142231343573?s=20
 
Last edited:
A 2023 report by the Government Accountability Office found that more than one million F‑35 spare parts had gone missing over the preceding five‑year period. The oversight body concluded that because Lockheed controlled the relevant information, the Department of Defense was unable to scrutinize the loss of spare parts worth tens of millions of dollars.Therefore, I believe it is possible for China to have gained access to some U.S. fighter‑jet parts. At the same time, I also suspect that this may well serve as a pretext for reconciling the books.
 
A 2023 report by the Government Accountability Office found that more than one million F‑35 spare parts had gone missing over the preceding five‑year period. The oversight body concluded that because Lockheed controlled the relevant information, the Department of Defense was unable to scrutinize the loss of spare parts worth tens of millions of dollars.Therefore, I believe it is possible for China to have gained access to some U.S. fighter‑jet parts. At the same time, I also suspect that this may well serve as a pretext for reconciling the books.
Rather than investigating potential embezzlement, shifting the blame onto China would also be a convenient option.
 
As for “F-35 parts ending up in Hong Kong” that’s obviously a pretty vague way of describing what actually happened. The report specifically mentions a canopy, but you can bet that a good chunk of those other components are going to be engine-related.
There is no indication of any engine related items being involved. Please do not add your own unfounded speculation here.

As for the claims that the Chinese have a whole F135, that is pure garbage.
 
There is no indication of any engine related items being involved. Please do not add your own unfounded speculation here.

As for the claims that the Chinese have a whole F135, that is pure garbage.
I see you have absolutely zero self-awareness...

BTW, contrary to what you claimed, I didn't add my "unfounded speculation" to the quote -- I made a guesstimate and explicitly presented it as such.

And I really don't understand why you're getting this defensive over it, as if someone personally insulted you. You have no clue how credible those rumors are either, yet you immediately jump to "pure garbage" and refuse to even entertain them -- that's the exact kind of reflexive dismissal you're accusing me of doing, btw...

The irony is that the scoop we're actually discussing shows that this sort of thing is entirely possible; that obviously doesn't prove yet that the F135 rumor is fully true, but it does make your absolute certainty that it's "pure garbage" look pretty damn premature...

  • 升推一体动力系统燃气发生器关键零件检测与逆向设计 (Detection/inspection and reverse design of key parts of the gas generator for the integrated lift-thrust power system). Dated 17 October 2025.
    This explicitly calls for inspecting critical gas-generator components (the core that produces the hot gas stream) and performing reverse engineering/design work on them.
  • 升推一体动力系统核心机原理实验测试系统集成 (Integration of a principle/experimental test system for the core engine of the integrated lift-thrust power system). Dated 1 August 2025.
    This covers building or integrating a test rig for fundamental experiments and validation of the core engine.
  • 升推一体动力系统组合压气机加工制造装配 (Processing, manufacturing, and assembly of the combined/compressor section for the integrated lift-thrust power system). Dated 19 March 2025.
    This involves machining, producing, and assembling the multi-stage compressor (a key high-pressure section of the engine).
These are standard Chinese government-style tender notices listing the project title, location (Beijing), type (招标公告 / bidding announcement), and release date.
G73pIRUbgAAAOg1
G73pITYaQAAlBrc
G73pIWwaMAMMH2k
 
I didn't add my "unfounded speculation" to the quote -- I made a guesstimate and explicitly presented it as such.
"but you can bet that a good chunk of those other components are going to be engine-related" is unfounded speculation. You can call it something else if you want but that is what it is.
And I really don't understand why you're getting this defensive over it, as if someone personally insulted you. You have no clue how credible those rumors are either, yet you immediately jump to "pure garbage" and refuse to even entertain them -- that's the exact kind of reflexive dismissal you're accusing me of doing, btw...
I am sick of people making comments without any facts or true knowledge. Using a Twitter post as some claim of evidence is laughable at best. I challenge you to find any credible evidence to back up this BS Twitter claim. As someone in the industry and having particular interest in this area I can assure you that they are utter garbage.
 
. As someone in the industry and having particular interest in this area I can assure you that they are utter garbage.
Actually that only shows your bias (as proved elsewhere on the forum, but that's another issue altogether). Besides i doubt you or pretty much anyone in the west really has any idea what the chinese got (or didn't got) F-35 wise. However the near-certain work on an F-135PW-600 like engine as well as iirc some surprisingly similar engine parts, well as a ruomured F-35B equivalent in the works certainly point to to some developments we might not be privy off and likely never will. For all we know they might have smuggled piece by piece an entire F-35 or at least big chunks of it, which is a hilarious thought, but again i doubt anyone on these forums has any way of knowing either way (if ever).
 
Last edited:
Well, well, well... Remember this little gem from the Chinese rumor mill?
Could be anything from seat covers to an engine. I'm guessing it's on the lower end. But keep the dream alive. ;)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There is no indication of any engine related items being involved. Please do not add your own unfounded speculation here.

As for the claims that the Chinese have a whole F135, that is pure garbage.
There was a time they thought someone had stolen an F100/110 from Hill AFB. Local paper had a comic with the engine strapped to the roof of a car going out the guard gate. Turned out to be a paperwork problem. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Actually that only shows your bias (as proved elsewhere on the forum, but that's another issue altogether). Besides i doubt you or pretty much anyone in the west really has any idea what the chinese got (or didn't got) F-35 wise. However the near-certain work on an F-135PW-600 like engine as well as iirc some surprisingly similar engine parts, well as a ruomured F-35B equivalent in the works certainly point to to some developments we might not be privy off and likely never will. For all we know they might have smuggled piece by piece an entire F-35 or at least big chunks of it, which is a hilarious thought, but again i doubt anyone on these forum has any way of knowing either way (if ever).
Well how else would they be able to build one? Gotta steal it somehow.
 
@GTX you're responding exactly like someone whose hubris has been hit...

I'm not claiming they got their hands on an entire F135, nor am I saying everything we've ever heard is true. My point is simply that the evidence we have suggests something clearly happened, whatever the actual extent of it...

And if it did turn out to be something more significant than what's been reported, the Pentagon would hardly be eager to come out and admit it. That's all I'm saying...

  • "升推一体动力系统燃气发生器关键零件检测与逆向设计 (Detection/inspection and reverse design of key parts of the gas generator for the integrated lift-thrust power system). Dated 17 October 2025.
    This explicitly calls for inspecting critical gas-generator components (the core that produces the hot gas stream) and performing reverse engineering/design work on them.
  • 升推一体动力系统核心机原理实验测试系统集成 (Integration of a principle/experimental test system for the core engine of the integrated lift-thrust power system). Dated 1 August 2025.
    This covers building or integrating a test rig for fundamental experiments and validation of the core engine.
  • 升推一体动力系统组合压气机加工制造装配 (Processing, manufacturing, and assembly of the combined/compressor section for the integrated lift-thrust power system). Dated 19 March 2025.
    This involves machining, producing, and assembling the multi-stage compressor (a key high-pressure section of the engine).
These are standard Chinese government-style tender notices listing the project title, location (Beijing), type (招标公告 / bidding announcement), and release date."

G73pIRUbgAAAOg1
G73pITYaQAAlBrc
G73pIWwaMAMMH2k
 
They only recently managed to develop a modern engine for the J-20, and now they’re supposed to build an F135 clone? I find that hard to believe. If they’re going to build a STOVL aircraft, it’ll likely be based on a different design—not a clone of the F-35B. But does it even make sense to talk about a Chinese STOVL when there’s no indication that one exists?
 
They only recently managed to develop a modern engine for the J-20, and now they’re supposed to build an F135 clone? I find that hard to believe. If they’re going to build a STOVL aircraft, it’ll likely be based on a different design—not a clone of the F-35B. But does it even make sense to talk about a Chinese STOVL when there’s no indication that one exists?
Why wouldn't they? By all accounts the lift fan is one of the parts of the F-35 that worked out of the box exactly as advertised.
 
@GTX you're responding exactly like someone whose hubris has been hit...
No, I am responding as someone who is sick of people posting unsubstantiated comments without real evidence and trying to make out that it is real.
I'm not claiming they got their hands on an entire F135, nor am I saying everything we've ever heard is true.
And yet you include a twitter post saying that "...the Chinese got their hands on a whole ass F135..." without any qualification or otherwise. Sure looks like you are trying to imply it is true.
My point is simply that the evidence we have suggests something clearly happened, whatever the actual extent of it...
So you are using the "no evidence = evidence" tactic? Right.
And if it did turn out to be something more significant than what's been reported, the Pentagon would hardly be eager to come out and admit it. That's all I'm saying...
More of the same.
 
Why wouldn't they? By all accounts the lift fan is one of the parts of the F-35 that worked out of the box exactly as advertised.
The clutch was apparently one of the more challenging parts to get working. IIRC it uses a mix of carbon-carbon brake tech and Top Fuel dragster clutch engagement design. Controlled slippage as RPMs come up and then finally locking up once the fan RPM has gotten up to a decent speed.
 
The clutch was apparently one of the more challenging parts to get working. IIRC it uses a mix of carbon-carbon brake tech and Top Fuel dragster clutch engagement design. Controlled slippage as RPMs come up and then finally locking up once the fan RPM has gotten up to a decent speed.
Well, nothing is flying *yet* in China.
It's very evident they're working on it, even if they're doing it 25 years later than the US.
We'll see soon enough anyway.
 
Well, nothing is flying *yet* in China.
It's very evident they're working on it, even if they're doing it 25 years later than the US.
We'll see soon enough anyway.
Yep. Just noting that while the lift fan itself is pretty simple, the drive is a little more complex than people have been thinking.
 
@GTX For someone who's so quick to jump to conclusions from scraps of evidence whenever it suits their preferred narrative, you sure are awfully fond of dissecting every sentence I write and demanding absolute proof for anything that doesn't fit it (while conveniently twisting what I actually said in the process).

Yah, from memory @Alfa_Particle was the one who reported it first, and he's generally had a pretty solid track record as a realistic kind of guy whose intentions are hardly something to be doubted. He also happens to back up his claim with official tender notices, which you persistently ignore while providing absolutely no evidence of your own in return...

That doesn't mean the "whole F135" part is necessarily true (IIRC that specific claim came from some members of the rumor mill whose names I can't remember -- hence why I'm also hesitant) ...although smuggling whatever components they can get their hands on, piece by piece, is hardly unexpected -- and at this point it's almost a fact that incidents like this have happened and will continue to happen. You don't believe a single F-35 part has ever ended up in China? Great, prove us wrong!

Alas, I was hesitant to write this post in the first place and drag this exchange out any further, but the replies I've already given you pretty much answer your persistent objections. So let's agree to disagree and move on...

@xena , tell me you're new to PLA-/aviation-watching without telling me you're new to PLA-/aviation-watching...

There has been a steady stream of indications for years now -- tenders, patents, research papers and reasonably credible insider rumors...

It's not our fault that you're oblivious to all of that, but you are at fault for jumping straight to the last post of the thread and blasting your ignorance instead of bothering to read the preceding chapters...

What you @GTX and @xena seem so insistently stuck on is this one F-35 scoop and @xena's ignorance, while we're trying to move on because the likelihood of at least certain F-35 parts ending up in China for intel analysis, as well as the likelihood of a stealth STOVL jet being developed by SAC, has become quite high based on the multiple indicators and pieces of evidence we've seen -- yet you're still objecting without providing any evidence for your position...

Regards
 
Where did two engines come from in my statement?
Well if it’s a “J-35B” I think it was implied to be a modified J-35 with the B moniker to copy the F-35, retaining the twin engines.

It is highly unlikely the plane would reuse the same number, as a single engine aircraft would be significantly different than the current J-35.
 
Well if it’s a “J-35B” I think it was implied to be a modified J-35 with the B moniker to copy the F-35, retaining the twin engines.

It is highly unlikely the plane would reuse the same number, as a single engine aircraft would be significantly different than the current J-35.
Have you seen Chinese space launch numbering? They could do it.
 
Have you seen Chinese space launch numbering? They could do it.
They can try to be funny and produce a J-32 ;) .
But realistically, probably some number in high 30ies. J-35 - J-36 couple somewhat implies possibility of return to direct sequence.
 
If you follow certain niche‑level Chinese internet circles, you may even come across reports that China’s variable‑cycle engine is also nearing finalization. That said, I cannot provide any proof for everyone on this forum. I do not doubt that China possesses the capability to build something comparable to the F135. What I question is whether China has a requirement for a vertical‑take‑off‑and‑landing aircraft.
 
There isn't an engine yet. There isn't even a test platform with a prototype engine. At least, no one has seen one yet. Research is certainly underway, but if there aren't even any test platforms yet, then we shouldn't expect to see such an aircraft for the next 10 years.

And research can go in any direction. So it’s pointless to discuss a VTOL/STOVL aircraft at this stage, because we have virtually nothing to go on except speculation. The Chinese are always good for surprises, and an STOVL aircraft could look completely different from an F-35B, with an entirely different design concept. We don't know.
 
There isn't an engine yet. There isn't even a test platform with a prototype engine. At least, no one has seen one yet. Research is certainly underway, but if there aren't even any test platforms yet, then we shouldn't expect to see such an aircraft for the next 10 years.

And research can go in any direction. So it’s pointless to discuss a VTOL/STOVL aircraft at this stage, because we have virtually nothing to go on except speculation. The Chinese are always good for surprises, and an STOVL aircraft could look completely different from an F-35B, with an entirely different design concept. We don't know.

VSTOL history shows there are many ways to do it. Most of it very bad obviously.

Would be funny if China unearthed RALS or PCB from the tech graveyard.
 
VSTOL history shows there are many ways to do it. Most of it very bad obviously.

Would be funny if China unearthed RALS or PCB from the tech graveyard.
I'm halfway expecting someone to add burners to the LiftFan at this point.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom