I heard it was just the institute's own project. If this is just to prove that you are capable of developing vertical take-off and landing aircraft yourself, as a technical preparation, will it be applied to the next generation of fighter jets?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I've heard this is just a project for the research institute itself. If it's merely to demonstrate your ability to develop a vertical takeoff and landing aircraft as a technological preparation, will it be applied to the next generation of fighter jets?
For pure research without practical implications, this is expensive and not very useful. I.e. there's some overflow of data into normal jet CTOL performance, but you may as well make a simpler demonstrator just for that alone.

The files @Tomboy mentions are a massive effort, it is a very expensive program, run in a place(Guizhou) that will require a significant investment to make it possible.
 
What are the odds, that what we're looking here is not a fan, as people are saying here, but a compressor (stator blades not depicted)?
In which case this hypothetical engine would be using reheat, with a large expansion nozzle, tuned for sea level and and low velocity (large expansion nozzle) . This would control the heat, help with hot gas reingestion, and the clutch and parasitic power drain on the main engine would be much lower than F-35B, which means the plane can fly with a much less powerful engine.

Afair, Hawker's proposed successor to the Harrier would've used a similar system.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom