- Joined
- 31 May 2009
- Messages
- 1,155
- Reaction score
- 794
Convair XF-92, made by the Consolidated model shop at Lindbergh Field, San Diego. This model belonged to XF-92 design engineer Thomas Melvin Hemphill.
The last picture you mention, I feel, shows the XF-92A and the upcoming YF-102 (pre-YF-102 if you will). -SPSkyblazer said:The last picture is interesting and a first for me: an F-92 with dual lateral intakes instead of a single nose intake? I'd like to know more about this.
Steve Pace said:The last picture you mention, I feel, shows the XF-92A and the upcoming YF-102 (pre-YF-102 if you will). -SP
Vladimir said:Hi to all
*SORT* *OF.* Yes, the planform & side views are very similar, but the airfoil sections are *very* different. Lippisch favored *fat* airfoils that would not have let this thing go transonic. The XP-92 and subsequent delta winged aircraft had *thin* wings with relatively sharp leading edges. These are not minor feature differences.The design closely follows the delta wing theory of Dr. Alexander M. Lippish,
This is a photograph of the XF-92A on display at an open house at Bees Air Force Base, New Hampshire, in May 1955.
Oh very nice. Crazy design though.
I think it's the aftermath of a heavy session/fever dream with Robert Woods, Don L. Brown, René Leduc & Alexander LippischOh very nice. Crazy design though.
I'd missed that one - mod's please move my post to the above thread?Thread 'Convair XP-92 / XF-92 - Development and Prototype' https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/threads/convair-xp-92-xf-92-development-and-prototype.3407/
And Miles with the M-52 ? Common, there were good reasons barrel-fuselage were considered in the late 1940's for high speed X planes.Seems Convair was smoking the same stuff LeDuc was...
Wasn't this right before area rule was discovered to be a good idea?And Miles with the M-52 ? Common, there were good reasons barrel-fuselage were considered in the late 1940's for high speed X planes.