• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

VTOL On Demand Mobility

fredymac

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
2,158
Reaction score
677
Bell's Nexus 4EX design change is based on customer feedback indicating inner city transport is more in demand.

https://www.aviationtoday.com/2020/...tal-infrastructure-and-an-all-electric-nexus/

“[Customers] wanted range, so we felt, let’s start at range and we can work our way back in,” Bell CEO Mitch Snyder told journalists during a December press visit to the company's headquarters. “And from the discussions, we felt there were really becoming two distinct requirements, one for inner-city movement and one for more range.”

With demand growing for inner-city aerial transit, Bell is pivoting toward that mission with the Nexus 4EX. Designed to maximize efficiency in forward flight, which is crucial now that the aircraft is fully electric, the 4EX has two fewer rotors and a longer back wing to provide more lift.

Bell is targeting a 60-mile range for 4-5 passengers and luggage, including reserves and multiple takeoffs and landings. Innovation lead Scott Drennan expects that by the time the Nexus 4EX is operation in the “mid-to-late 2020s,” energy storage density will have improved roughly 10-15 percent, allowing the design to hit these targets.
 

TomcatViP

Hellcat
Joined
Feb 12, 2017
Messages
2,609
Reaction score
1,131
And many things more here. The approach taken by Bell looks infinitivly more realistic than other competitors and is widely explained there.
 

stealthflanker

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2010
Messages
621
Reaction score
291
Do we have any regulations for propwash/downwash speed ? As smaller rotor may means faster downwash speed... This could pose potential hazard namely it can fly small things, kicking up dust and blow structures away such as tent.

It might not be a problem for lightweight system but as things grow heavier.. means more power and with smaller ducted fans or propellers means more propwash.

This is an example :

 

VTOLicious

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2008
Messages
695
Reaction score
294
I recently came across the VRT 500 helicopter and was wondering how all those Airtaxi Concepts compare to a modern single engine helicopter... The VRT 500 is not certified yet. However, I appears to perfectly fit in the Airtaxi niche. Actually it is promoted for Airtaxi applications as well
 

Attachments

  • 20200110_143350.jpg
    20200110_143350.jpg
    596 KB · Views: 64
  • 20200110_144537.jpg
    20200110_144537.jpg
    240.7 KB · Views: 67
  • 20200110_144457.jpg
    20200110_144457.jpg
    166.9 KB · Views: 70

VTOLicious

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2008
Messages
695
Reaction score
294
Bell X-22A revisited 54 years later... Unfortunately the drawbacks inherent to ducted propellers cannot be solved by distributed electric propulsion.
What kind of drawbacks? I'd think they'd be safer than tilt-rotors.

It's not about safety. That is mainly a certification aspect and dependent on what is considered as acceptable... Btw, are four rotors "safe"?

The X-22A is without a doubt one of the most sucessfull experimental aircraft ever tested in the golden age of VTOL. The NASA tech report server has plenty of reports available... As far as I remember the main issues of ducted propellers are the following:

  • A duct can either be designed for hover or cruise conditions => Variable inlet / outlet geometry adds weight / complexity.
  • Flow seperation at the inlet, especially during transition, is another issue. That brings me back to the first item => "bell mouth" required for transition / hover => Lots of drag in cruise.
  • Ducts generate large moments in cross flow condtions (cross wind, transition,...).
  • Additionally, it may not be as quiet as one would expect ;)

BR Michael
 

sferrin

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
13,564
Reaction score
1,575
I was thinking safety as in no exposed rotors (but then I guess with a tilt-rotor they're up in the air anyway. . .)
 

yasotay

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2006
Messages
2,429
Reaction score
609
Well the enclosed rotors are much better for operating in urban areas I would assume. I don't know that they are significantly quieter than a TR, but would imagine the impulse is less since the blade tips are enclosed. I recall reading/hearing that the X-22A made a loud buzzing noise, but cannot confirm that. Biggest drawback that comes to mind is a similar (possibly more intense?) downwash/outwash.
 

sferrin

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
13,564
Reaction score
1,575
Well the enclosed rotors are much better for operating in urban areas I would assume. I don't know that they are significantly quieter than a TR, but would imagine the impulse is less since the blade tips are enclosed. I recall reading/hearing that the X-22A made a loud buzzing noise, but cannot confirm that. Biggest drawback that comes to mind is a similar (possibly more intense?) downwash/outwash.

Yeah, more like an F-35 lift fan than a rotor. (Though closer to the latter than the former given the differences in HP.)
 

shedofdread

ACCESS: Secret
Joined
Nov 14, 2009
Messages
460
Reaction score
89
The drag of ducted props / fans is enormous. They're one of the technologies that we all hear about that promise so much ....until you speak to anyone that's ever been involved in their use ;)
 

Sundog

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2006
Messages
2,841
Reaction score
287
The drag of ducted props / fans is enormous. They're one of the technologies that we all hear about that promise so much ....until you speak to anyone that's ever been involved in their use ;)

They're very efficient in the hover, so if you're just going do a lot of hovering or slow speed flight they're great. Of course, one of the reasons they like them for vehicles like this is safety. There aren't tips passengers or people walking around them can't see. Everything is enclosed within the duct.

They also become problematic if you try to use the duct to generate lift, because one side can be stalling while the other side is generating a lot of lift, which can cause huge moments and control issues.
 

VTOLicious

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2008
Messages
695
Reaction score
294

Attachments

  • IMG_20191221_162143.jpg
    IMG_20191221_162143.jpg
    1 MB · Views: 74

fredymac

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
2,158
Reaction score
677
Aerodynamically, what distinguishes a duct from a nacelle so it is different from an ultra large turbo fan on an airliner? A fan tilted 90 degrees so it faces the direction of travel should have constant blade speed relative to air at all "clock" positions so how do you get asymmetry in load? Is a "fenestron" a form of ducted fan? Just curious.
 

VTOLicious

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2008
Messages
695
Reaction score
294

Attachments

  • CityAirbus-infographics-without-background.jpg
    CityAirbus-infographics-without-background.jpg
    51.8 KB · Views: 84
Last edited:

shedofdread

ACCESS: Secret
Joined
Nov 14, 2009
Messages
460
Reaction score
89
Some development we were doing years ago involved ducted fan UAS. Before we flew the full, ducted versions, we flew an unducted test 'mule'. One day whilst conducting bad weather (high wind + turbulence) hovering tests with the ducted one, the pronounced 'nose-down' into wind attitude was observed. So the old mule was fired up and flown in similar conditions and could hover with a far less 'nose down' attitude even though it had no fairings etc covering it's structure etc. LOADS of parasitic drag. So, ducts can be such a drag, can't they? ;)

PS in tests the ducted one was found to be 78.62% cooler.....
 

VTOLicious

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2008
Messages
695
Reaction score
294
Some pics of it attached...
Imho that vehicle looks overly complex and pretty much oversized for a 5-seater.
  • 4 pairs of coaxial lift-rotors. Most propably fixed pitch.
  • 4 tilt rotors. Most propably variable pitch.
  • ...mounted on this super thin wing and empennage, obliged to transfer the loads o_O God bless CFRP!
However, I have to admit I like the visual design.
Btw, EmbraerX introduced a very similar design.
 

Attachments

  • Hyundai-Uber_08.jpg
    Hyundai-Uber_08.jpg
    6 MB · Views: 47
  • Hyundai-Uber_07.jpg
    Hyundai-Uber_07.jpg
    6.1 MB · Views: 41
  • Hyundai-Uber_04.jpg
    Hyundai-Uber_04.jpg
    430.2 KB · Views: 39
  • Hyundai-Uber_01.jpg
    Hyundai-Uber_01.jpg
    548.1 KB · Views: 39
  • Hyundai-Uber_03.jpg
    Hyundai-Uber_03.jpg
    506.5 KB · Views: 37
  • Hyundai-Uber_06.jpg
    Hyundai-Uber_06.jpg
    1.7 MB · Views: 52
Last edited:

VTOLicious

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2008
Messages
695
Reaction score
294
...said proposal of EmbraerX. It does not feature tilt-rotors at least.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20190619_075038.jpg
    IMG_20190619_075038.jpg
    232.6 KB · Views: 55
  • IMG_20190619_075034.jpg
    IMG_20190619_075034.jpg
    292.2 KB · Views: 55

Viper2000

I really should change my personal text
Joined
Jun 8, 2018
Messages
21
Reaction score
17
This sounds more like lift from the ducts than drag.
Nope

Surely aerodynamically, this flow turning amounts to an asymmetric lift force on the duct—even if the normal term of art is ram / intake momentum drag—because turning requires circulation & circulation is lift?

Another way to think about this is that if it was purely a drag force, it should scale with freestream dynamic pressure, and therefore be insensitive to the power setting.

Also, if this is genuinely driven by momentum rather than lift, it should be insensitive to specific thrust, but I suspect that the problem is worse for higher specific thrust systems, at least up to the point where shocks form around the the intake lip & induce separation...
 

Moose

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2010
Messages
1,353
Reaction score
312
...said proposal of EmbraerX. It does not feature tilt-rotors at least.
Maybe just my own biases, but I'm more bearish on stop-rotor designs over the long term than I am tilt-rotors.
 

VTOLicious

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2008
Messages
695
Reaction score
294
...said proposal of EmbraerX. It does not feature tilt-rotors at least.
Maybe just my own biases, but I'm more bearish on stop-rotor designs over the long term than I am tilt-rotors.
I don't have preferences. However, my concern is that tilt-rotors add another layer of complexity, due to the tilt mechanism, the variable pitch mechanism and the necessity to control both.
 

mboeller

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
Jan 13, 2008
Messages
53
Reaction score
19
Toyota invests in Joby Aviation:


 

VTOLicious

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2008
Messages
695
Reaction score
294
Toyota invests in Joby Aviation:

According to their website they were flight testing full scale production prototypes for 2 years and are in the process of type certification.
 

Attachments

  • 20200116_190309.jpg
    20200116_190309.jpg
    208.4 KB · Views: 22

Moose

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2010
Messages
1,353
Reaction score
312
Those forward nacelles certainly have a different take on the issue of rotor tilt. Let's hear it for the wonders of relatively compact electric motors.
 

Zoo Tycoon

ACCESS: Secret
Senior Member
Joined
May 27, 2008
Messages
417
Reaction score
456
Although the vertical take off/landing disc loading look viable, it’s fiendishly complicated with all those variable pitch props, engine rotation, retractable gear and flying controls. I wonder what happens when you get ice on two blades of one of the rear props?

Crashworthiness also looks scary/marginal, a lot of mass/inertia above the cabin, I suspected the blade inertia is too low for auto rotation, wafer thin plexiglass is not known for its strength, ballistic parachutes take a good 150ft to deploy (not that they can be claimed in the certification) so the pax will be the filling in a sandwich.

I’m unconvinced by the range to speed to weight, seems to be the way these days, make outrageous claims to get outrageous money.
 
Last edited:

VTOLicious

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2008
Messages
695
Reaction score
294
"...Six aircraft intended for urban air mobility application are “well along” in pursuing type certification with the Federal Aviation Administration, said Jay Merkle, head of the FAA’s UAS integration office, at the Transportation Review Board’s annual meeting in Orlando, Fla..."

 

Moose

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2010
Messages
1,353
Reaction score
312
Jeez, what did Cnet film that chunky video on?
 

VTOLicious

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2008
Messages
695
Reaction score
294
With a number of companies in the process of certification I think we will see the wheat separated from the chaff soon
 

Zoo Tycoon

ACCESS: Secret
Senior Member
Joined
May 27, 2008
Messages
417
Reaction score
456

Here we go....

“But the dream could possibly end suddenly: there are increasing doubts as to whether Lilium - a showcase project, celebrated and admired by ministers and Chancellor Angela Merkel, funded by the European Space Agency Esa - is working seriously. The thesis stands in the room that the ambition of the founders is not compatible with the laws of physics.”

Interesting that the original technical report (thesis) has disappeared from every weby location..... seems to be a bit of a legal thing going on ..... but the laws of physics can’t be prosecuted.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Top