Bell X-22A ducted-propellor VTOL

SAustin16 said:
... The ducted fans could not auto-rotate. The pilot had no "Plan B".


That's right, but that's imminent to more or less ALL designs with ducted fans, like, for example,
the Nord 500 and derivatives, or several Hiller designs and, at least for take-off and landing for
the Coleopters, too. AFAIK, all those designs were multi-engined and the fans were driven via
cross-coupled shafts, so at least the failue of an engine, not necessarily had fatal results. The
failure of the gear box, or a fan of course would have, but if you look at the helicopter, it's more
or less the same, I think, with regards to safety.
 
before flying X-22A
 

Attachments

  • 2013-03-04_18272924.jpg
    2013-03-04_18272924.jpg
    136.9 KB · Views: 171

Attachments

  • Bell X-22 Model - 8.JPG
    Bell X-22 Model - 8.JPG
    53.4 KB · Views: 44
  • Bell X-22 Model - 7.JPG
    Bell X-22 Model - 7.JPG
    64.5 KB · Views: 34
  • Bell X-22 Model - 6.JPG
    Bell X-22 Model - 6.JPG
    56 KB · Views: 37
  • Bell X-22 Model - 5.JPG
    Bell X-22 Model - 5.JPG
    49.7 KB · Views: 50
  • Bell X-22 Model - 4.JPG
    Bell X-22 Model - 4.JPG
    81.8 KB · Views: 55
  • Bell X-22 Model - 3.JPG
    Bell X-22 Model - 3.JPG
    58 KB · Views: 54
  • Bell X-22 Model - 2.JPG
    Bell X-22 Model - 2.JPG
    52.5 KB · Views: 64
  • Bell X-22 Model - 1.JPG
    Bell X-22 Model - 1.JPG
    53.3 KB · Views: 82
From "Der Flieger", January 1964, two quite blurry pictures (due to the small size),
one showing it in the well known form, taking off from a carrier, the other with
a solid nosed ASW version (fitted with a MAD sting ?).
 

Attachments

  • Bell_X-22_10.jpg
    Bell_X-22_10.jpg
    200.3 KB · Views: 151
  • Bell_X-22_ASW_01.jpg
    Bell_X-22_ASW_01.jpg
    193.5 KB · Views: 161
Why was X-22 never taken as TRI-VTOL aircraft ?
Was there unsolvable technical problem ?
or was X-22 victim of many R&D program, concept proved X-project ends ?
 
Michel Van said:
Why was X-22 never taken as TRI-VTOL aircraft ?

AFAIK, at least the second prototype was tested by all three armed service branches.
 
Michel Van said:
Why was X-22 never taken as TRI-VTOL aircraft ?
Was there unsolvable technical problem ?
or was X-22 victim of many R&D program, concept proved X-project ends ?

Vought won the Tri-Service competition for a five-aircraft prototype program with the XC-142 but the Navy thought that Bell's ducted-fan concept might better suit its mission requirements, which resulted in the X-22 program. Similarly, the Air Force separately funded the Curtiss-Wright X-19. Both were subscale demonstrators as opposed to the operationally sized XC-142. Depending on who is telling the story, all the programs disappointed from a performance standpoint or the Vietnam War began to suck funds from experimental and development programs with longer term potential. However, the fact that the only operational VTOL aircraft (Harrier/F-35B and V-22) are not too far from the extremes of disc-loading (pure jet versus conventional helicopter) suggests that the tilt wing, ducted propeller, tilt-propeller, etc. concepts that fall in the middle of the disc-loading range are not fast or cruise-efficient enough to offset their lack of hover efficiency/capability.
 
Good Day All -

Courtesy of the Gerald Balzer Collection, a better scan of the Flight International cutaway. I have some X-22A photos yet to scan and will post those later.

Enjoy the Day! Mark
 

Attachments

  • zBell X-22A Cutaway - Flight International.jpg
    zBell X-22A Cutaway - Flight International.jpg
    938.5 KB · Views: 586
Thanks Mark - one of my favourite aircraft! Looking forward to the photos.
 
Good Day All -

Here are the photos, courtesy of the Gerald Balzer Collection.

Note the first two are of BuNO 151521, all others are of 151520. I would assume 151520 flew first but was damaged in a hard landing after a double hydraulic failure and was not rebuilt. 151521 flew the majority of the test program.

Enjoy the Day! Mark
 

Attachments

  • z205389.jpg
    z205389.jpg
    593.9 KB · Views: 105
  • z205391.jpg
    z205391.jpg
    732.8 KB · Views: 78
  • z205394.jpg
    z205394.jpg
    654.8 KB · Views: 80
  • z213399-3.jpg
    z213399-3.jpg
    1.3 MB · Views: 131
  • z205384.jpg
    z205384.jpg
    580.1 KB · Views: 99
  • z205385.jpg
    z205385.jpg
    712.4 KB · Views: 96
  • z205383.jpg
    z205383.jpg
    863 KB · Views: 322
  • z289495ECcrop.jpg
    z289495ECcrop.jpg
    770 KB · Views: 342
  • z289495EC.jpg
    z289495EC.jpg
    620.9 KB · Views: 361
GTX said:
Thanks Mark - one of my favourite aircraft! Looking forward to the photos.

x2. I wonder how a configuration like this would perform on the FPV racing scene. :)
 
Thx for sharing those great pictures!

Here is an article from the AW-archives:

BR Michael
 

Attachments

  • 2-1.jpg
    2-1.jpg
    684.3 KB · Views: 79
  • 3.jpg
    3.jpg
    242.2 KB · Views: 104
  • 4.jpg
    4.jpg
    348.6 KB · Views: 98
  • 5.jpg
    5.jpg
    281.9 KB · Views: 80
My thanks as well for the wonderful pictures of one of my all time favorite aircraft.
 
Thanks to Mark Nankivil, a report on the X-22A.

http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/X-22AReport.pdf
 
If you ever wanted to build your very own X-22A cockpit, and I hope you do, these might help (from Bell Aerosystems X-22A flight manual). Enjoy..
 

Attachments

  • axil inst.jpg
    axil inst.jpg
    547.3 KB · Views: 22
  • cautionlights.jpg
    cautionlights.jpg
    280.4 KB · Views: 19
  • cbrkrs-1.jpg
    cbrkrs-1.jpg
    224.2 KB · Views: 20
  • cbrkrs-2a.jpg
    cbrkrs-2a.jpg
    235.2 KB · Views: 17
  • inst centre.jpg
    inst centre.jpg
    789.1 KB · Views: 17
  • inst-main1.jpg
    inst-main1.jpg
    799.2 KB · Views: 17
  • lhconsole.jpg
    lhconsole.jpg
    332 KB · Views: 15
  • rhconsole.jpg
    rhconsole.jpg
    300.4 KB · Views: 44
I forgot to mention the DIGITROLS of the right hand console were for configuring the Variable Stability System so the aircraft could evaluate various VSTOL configurations.
 
From "Der Flieger", January 1964, two quite blurry pictures (due to the small size),
one showing it in the well known form, taking off from a carrier, the other with
a solid nosed ASW version (fitted with a MAD sting ?).
In relation to the ASW version of X-22 Jemiba, I just stumbled across the following:

Regards
Pioneer
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20230108_231222.jpg
    IMG_20230108_231222.jpg
    338.2 KB · Views: 48

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom