ah, yes they do.Last I saw, most static test stands don't have liquid-filled tankage a couple of meters away.
ah, yes they do.Last I saw, most static test stands don't have liquid-filled tankage a couple of meters away.
Of course, I would be. There is no need for NASA to develop and manage its own launch vehicles anymore. NASA can go to the marketplace for any space launch needs. The government is now a user and not a supplier, even for its own needs.It's useless without strap-ons, yes...but those didn't have to be solids. Of course, if Ted Cruz proposed Pyrios--you'd just be against that too.
Starship will have an orbital flight and a successful recovery before SLS flies again.Seems that way--I wonder if Starship will be ready by then either....will some genius come up with a gravity mirror somewhere? Ugh....
Likely but not certain IMO, if Starship v3 has the same track record v2 so far, and if NASA is serious about April 2026 being a "no later than" (very much doubt no later than are a thing in astronautics...) and they actually have a shot at launching earlier in 2026, then I could see the other way around.Starship will have an orbital flight and a successful recovery before SLS flies again.
Highly. They can have 4-5 flights before Artemis II.Likely but not certain IMO, i
Reviewing the events, politics, and work reported by NASA and its partners during the second quarter of 2025 on preparations and planning for the Artemis II, III, IV missions and beyond.
Imagery is courtesy of NASA, except where noted.
Links to social media posts:
https://bsky.app/profile/spacepolicyo...https://www.youtube.com/redirect?event=video_description&redir_token=QUFFLUhqbExUNWhLcjE4Wm1ZSzBuVngxTXRseF8xV3p3QXxBQ3Jtc0trVzZycThLLVNWSTNuelFuV0tjUzFic3JLYlhlakxWYnlZV3ZETWVTa19yd2t6dTRGeExzUHBSTk42cDJFQk5ycmZwM3NtQks4V1cyLUwwRXk0Nm9vM3VKQng5ZUgwYXpOMHBhcE5zNlRGOW9QQUJIbw&q=https://bsky.app/profile/spacepolicyonline.bsky.social/post/3lqv4bkz44u2a&v=D0ZGU_yn9So
https://x.com/NASASpaceflight/status/...https://www.youtube.com/redirect?event=video_description&redir_token=QUFFLUhqbDFrcGtEclV4Vi1qSGU2TGgzNDVkM2V4VFV3Z3xBQ3Jtc0tsR1p4NlRyRHVSTTQxYnhTbThjNndCeFhhTFBOOUxNcmxUbEs1T2wycEdKYng0MERyMUF0LWdNWmxZZjAtVzNQdU1acjlpSG93ajA1RndtX0EwVWJfYjBFZW1RWWZEdXBPSW42cHBveHNQa2Q5aE9jZw&q=https://x.com/NASASpaceflight/status/1935548909805601020&v=D0ZGU_yn9So
https://x.com/AirbusSpace/status/1930...https://www.youtube.com/redirect?event=video_description&redir_token=QUFFLUhqbmQ1VWphaTZXZmxiZ2xBdUloMGVpYTJZeU9PQXxBQ3Jtc0trR3RSLVV2aFlnRDVvbnl2cWxHYnB2QmVrN2hVTDBObEdjQnlIckdLUWZNRmhOUEhCa20tNF9uczhVczBzR3NQWkJsQzA4OU55cEt1aWNhdHdkSlIwV2RJcVVFUC1xMDY1cTEtcG1KQjlfNTRTNkZEbw&q=https://x.com/AirbusSpace/status/1930289406105018614&v=D0ZGU_yn9So
Links to stories referenced:
https://www.semafor.com/article/05/31...https://www.youtube.com/redirect?event=video_description&redir_token=QUFFLUhqbUdDa2pDUEktb3UxckF1T0M0bjhNOVNIeWhDUXxBQ3Jtc0trUDFMVjFJbW5ZVnpGODZUR2F0Ui0yQ0pybThldGZGd1JNbWVCZWVGQmNSTVhhTld0WHlFVm5DdjBmMWdoOUsyZ3BQbUJ2OGFwbjNaelNhNzBzZjZmdU85N0ZHRmQ5QUhZOGxPbGw4RTYzSmNDdFBLYw&q=https://www.semafor.com/article/05/31/2025/white-house-expected-to-pull-nasa-nominee-isaacman&v=D0ZGU_yn9So
Jack Beyer's remote camera video of the SLS Booster Obsolescence and Life Extension (BOLE) demonstration motor test:
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EC9icOKGJ94
• World's Largest SRB Fails During Testinghttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EC9icOKGJ94
00:00 IntroView: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0ZGU_yn9So&t=51s
00:51 Two SLS ground static fire tests for Artemis V and beyond, one secret, one not
01:19 NASA secretly conducts RS-25 test
03:20 Nozzle anomaly at the end of the first test of next-gen SLS solid rocket motor
09:40 Artemis II status and outlook
15:28 Artemis III status and outlook
23:23 Review of the political drama of this quarterView: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0ZGU_yn9So&t=1588s
26:28 Artemis IV status and outlookView: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0ZGU_yn9So&t=1880s
31:20 Thanks for watching!
As the thumbnail says, that's the question -- why is NASA now conducting tests in secrecy for something they made a big deal out of not long ago? Conducting RS-25 tests in secret seems to be the latest move by NASA and the White House to conceal work on the stuff that OMB wants terminated. Neither NASA nor the administration has explained what they're doing, and maybe that's part of the plan.
Imagery is courtesy of NASA, except where noted.
McGregor Live (http://nsf.live/mcgregor) courtesy of NSF/NASASpaceflight, used with permission.
Links to social media posts:
https://www.youtube.com/redirect?ev...nnis/status/1775254100575150169&v=dlFkKGUsiKY
/ 1775254100575150169
/ 1775525102878089686
/ 1775554913667256631 https://x.com/NASAStennis/status/1937...https://www.youtube.com/redirect?ev...nnis/status/1937227920159744129&v=dlFkKGUsiKY
00:00 Intro
01:00 RS-25 test not even announced until three days after it was conducted
03:41 SpaceX is testing their engine hardware more transparently than NASA now
07:02 NASA's response to why the test was conducted in secret leaves the questions open
08:47 Full footage of the test finally released
09:31 How long will this secrecy continue?
10:27 Thanks for watching!
Well. Welcome aboard. Better late to the party than miss it altogether, Byeman.Starship will have an orbital flight and a successful recovery before SLS flies again.
never was late. Been against SLS since its inception.Well. Welcome aboard. Better late to the party than miss it altogether, Byeman.
SLS is nearly stacked and has a NET 8 months away. In the last 8 months, the Starship program has had 3 flight failures and lost a vehicle on the ground. They've yet to demonstrate satellite deployment or an effective TPS, or even completed a V2 flight without a major incident. I'll be very pleased if they complete an orbital flight and catch a starship in the next 3-4 flights, but it is by no means the assured outcome.Starship will have an orbital flight and a successful recovery before SLS flies again.
..and hownever was late. Been against SLS since its inception.
Yeah, NET of 8 months. That shows how bad it is. Two launches in 4 years is an abomination.SLS is nearly stacked and has a NET 8 months away. In the last 8 months, the Starship program has had 3 flight failures and lost a vehicle on the ground. They've yet to demonstrate satellite deployment or an effective TPS, or even completed a V2 flight without a major incident. I'll be very pleased if they complete an orbital flight and catch a starship in the next 3-4 flights, but it is by no means the assured outcome.
spacenews.com
spacenews.com
It may not matter as much as if the White House has already decimated the NASA workforce by then, but Congress is starting to publish their plans for the Fiscal Year 2026 budget. The Senate was concerned about Artemis sustainability and affordability last year, before the circus came to town. (NASA Exploration is the generic name rather than the Artemis brand name.) The race to land the next people on the Moon is still the priority, but the Senate still wants to start preparing for what comes after that in the next decade.
Instead of the White House plan to cancel lunar landing capabilities in two years whether or not a landing takes place, the Senate wants to sustain SLS and Orion until their replacement can fly astronauts back and forth to the Moon. They also want to increase funding to speed up the Starship and Blue Moon HLS plans now. Their plan would start investing in commercial lunar transportation development, but not at the expense of the capabilities they've already spent so much money on.
I take a first look at that proposal in this video and also go over the latest news about Artemis II launch preparations, Artemis III development and assembly, and other Artemis news and notes.
Imagery is courtesy of NASA, except where noted.
Links to social media posts:
https://www.youtube.com/redirect?ev...WKEzjDNMkDGzjsC4iZR2psqHNb22EPl&v=S3hYd_B6RTc
/ pfbid0gqhk7mxpyskkljxk2vwjix8fihfzy2njwnwk... https://www.youtube.com/redirect?ev...WKEzjDNMkDGzjsC4iZR2psqHNb22EPl&v=S3hYd_B6RTc
https://x.com/SenMarkKelly/status/194...
https://www.youtube.com/redirect?ev...8zjuH9PfwPvHhAtYYFoRusZskNYXNKl&v=S3hYd_B6RTc
/ pfbid09uiy3vacy56kjq7qjpbndxspagmzwgyisx8z... https://www.youtube.com/redirect?ev...8zjuH9PfwPvHhAtYYFoRusZskNYXNKl&v=S3hYd_B6RTc
https://x.com/SecDuffyNASA/status/194...https://www.youtube.com/redirect?ev...NASA/status/1946351031287443529&v=S3hYd_B6RTc
https://x.com/NASASpaceflight/status/...https://www.youtube.com/redirect?ev...ight/status/1935548909805601020&v=S3hYd_B6RTc
Links to stories referenced:
https://nasawatch.com/personnel-news/...https://www.youtube.com/redirect?ev...asa-workforce-depletion-update/&v=S3hYd_B6RTc
https://nasawatch.com/ask-the-adminis...https://www.youtube.com/redirect?ev...time-nasa-administrator-update/&v=S3hYd_B6RTc
https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2025/...https://www.youtube.com/redirect?ev.../2025/07/spacex-roundup-q22025/&v=S3hYd_B6RTc
https://onfirstup.com/boeing/BNN/arti...https://www.youtube.com/redirect?ev...its-alive-moon-rocket-powers-up&v=S3hYd_B6RTc
https://onfirstup.com/boeing/BNN/arti...https://www.youtube.com/redirect?ev...://buymeacoffee.com/philipsloss&v=S3hYd_B6RTc
00:00 Intro
01:10 Update on Artemis II launch preparations
07:27 New interim NASA administrator starts his moonlighting job
07:55 House and Senate funding bills outline rejection of White House numbers and plans
10:05 Senate proposal considers a different Artemis transition
15:12 News and notes for the week, beginning with an Orion support equipment sighting in Kansas
17:32 Pictures (or renders) of EUS structural test article hardware assembly
20:40 Elon Musk forecasts Starship flight test 10 in early August
22:55 SLS Core Stage-3 LOX tank prepared for final assembly
25:54 Thanks for watching!
That's because Elon isn't the director of NASA.Funny when SLS has problems, we don't get those posts that make some idiotic comparisons.
Par for the course would be something like:
Artemis II will be no different than the last Concorde flight and have a flame follow it up like gunpowder chasing Yosemite Sam
Given they've only launched one in 15 years, at a cost of Even-God-Doesn't-Know, that would be a neat trick.When was the last time two SLS cores split in a row?
Again, a non-relevant point. Proof testing did was exactly what it was supposed to do.When was the last time two SLS cores split in a row?
Does anyone know why they haven't designed a more effective heat shield? so they're going to use the same one but changing the re-entry trajectory.
Orion's first heat shield--that one was tested after flying atop D-IV
That's why it is good to not just test in flight, but to have robust institutions look things over as wellFrom what I recall the Orion CM in the EFT-1 mission didn't have the same velocity at the reentry interface as the Artemis I CM (Also I think it may've been flying a different reentry profile).
what is a "robust institution"?That's why it is good to not just test in flight, but to have robust institutions look things over as well
A. How are centers that support research "robust"?Centers that support research.
I'd like to see more papers about Starship as there are about SLS.
this aged well.I think that static test stand is a bit more robust than Massey's. And this is why tests are made.
The SLS core needs rather less tweaking that Starship.
Modifications like I suggested to allow wet workshop conversion would also lend better access on the pad as well as orbit, with no MSS.
Everyone else has already moved on from the successful Artemis II Wet Dress Rehearsal on Thursday, February 19th, because less than a day later something broke on the Interim Cryogenic Propulsion Stage and that means rollback and delays and an uncertain launch schedule. But before I move on, too, I'll run through my thoughts about NASA's coverage of the second WDR, which continues a pattern of obscuring or muting critical countdown events as they happen live.
NASA may be of the opinion that technical events only matter on launch day or are more dramatic if you only show or acknowledge them on launch day, but we're once again seeing that things matter before then, whether or not it's during big pre-launch tests.
Imagery is courtesy of NASA, except where noted.
Links to social media posts:
https://x.com/NASASpaceflight/status/...https://www.youtube.com/redirect?ev...ight/status/2024662082709533165&v=X8KvXDLbuXY
https://www.youtube.com/redirect?ev...://buymeacoffee.com/philipsloss&v=X8KvXDLbuXY
00:00 Intro
01:09 Overview of Wet Dress Rehearsal 2 and coverage
04:32 A short history of Artemis WDRs and WDR coverage
07:39 WDR 2, the good: more views, up-close views
12:36 The not quite as good: making it hard to tell what's happening
Wasn’t it NewSpacers that didn’t want the Saturn LUT preserved?