blackkite said:
Skyblazer said:blackkite said:
What a find! Source?
The nr 2 engine has a seemingly very small air inlet on the top of the fuselage. One would suspect it would be running at a lower capacity than the other two. Has any-one more info on this small intake?
Tthose were the early days of jet-propulsion. It's probable that they might have had to increase fuselage wall clearance.Yes, I noticed that.The pictures depict the inlet in open position, and then it seems to me rather small.
Cool artwork by Logan Hartke. - Great Plane, great artist!
Regards, Athpilot
I missed this before, excellent . . .IView attachment 656856View attachment 656857View attachment 656858View attachment 656859 added plate and camouflage
Those early jets with tiny inlets always look so weird to me...IView attachment 656856View attachment 656857View attachment 656858View attachment 656859 added plate and camouflage
Hello everyone,I just stumbled across this interesting article by by Tony R. Landis on the Air Force Materiel Command History Office (AFMC) website regarding Martin's proposed XB-51 carrying two of their MX-771 Matador winged missiles, on each wingtip.
Regards
Pioneer
https://www.afmc.af.mil/News/Articl...artin-xb-51-with-two-mx-771-matador-missiles/
The Martin XB-51 was one of the most unique and experimental jet aircraft ever built in the U.S. Designed at the dawn of the jet age, this American trijet ground-attack aircraft was faster than many fighters of its time, featuring radical design choices like variable-incidence wings, rotating bomb bay, and a tandem landing gear system.
This video dives deep into the design, development, flight history, crash incidents, and the ultimate fate of the Martin XB-51, comparing it to its Cold War contemporaries and explaining why it was rejected in favor of the English Electric Canberra.If you're passionate about rare aircraft, Cold War aviation, or forgotten experimental jets, this video is for you. Learn how this incredible jet nearly changed U.S. military aviation history—then disappeared.
Gone, not even on archive.org. Did anyone save them?There are about 20 photo's of the XB-51 on the air force web site.
http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/se...agesearch.asp&site=Museum&btnG.x=30&btnG.y=12
Is there anything else on this apparent B-51B proposal?From A Complete History of U.S. Combat Aircraft Fly-Off Competitions: Winners, Losers, and What Might Have Been by Erik Simonsen
O RLY?Gone, not even on archive.org. Did anyone save them?
Hi,
why we didn't talk about its competition and the tenders,one of them was
Douglas Model-743 ?!.
So, not having the said book, and appreciating your reason for not displaying the drawing....That's from this book,but I can't display the drawing,because it's still available.