Hi,
 

Attachments

  • 491012_original.jpg
    491012_original.jpg
    55.2 KB · Views: 448
  • xb51fb.JPG
    xb51fb.JPG
    26.3 KB · Views: 422
  • XB-51.gif
    XB-51.gif
    169.2 KB · Views: 460
  • AirTrailsPictorial_Mar50CvrLoRes.jpg
    AirTrailsPictorial_Mar50CvrLoRes.jpg
    321.4 KB · Views: 371
  • martin_blasting_beauty.jpg
    martin_blasting_beauty.jpg
    77.9 KB · Views: 337
  • martin_XB_51_cover.jpg
    martin_XB_51_cover.jpg
    116.5 KB · Views: 353
  • i_116.png
    i_116.png
    11 KB · Views: 336
Another freebie article from War Eagles Air Museum, about the XB-51.

http://www.war-eagles-air-museum.com/newsletters/weam_newsletter_2008-2.pdf
 
From A Complete History of U.S. Combat Aircraft Fly-Off Competitions: Winners, Losers, and What Might Have Been by Erik Simonsen
 

Attachments

  • rfewrw.png
    rfewrw.png
    561.3 KB · Views: 440
Cool autographed picture. The other names are Pete Everest, Fred Ascani, and I guess the other one is Bob Salinas(?).
 
That last one is Bob Cardenas. He was a longtime test pilot at Edwards and flew lots of cool stuff.
 
Right! Cardenas! the guy who flew the B-29 on Yeager's X-1 flights.
 

Attachments

  • s-l1600 (23).jpg
    s-l1600 (23).jpg
    222.5 KB · Views: 296
  • s-l1600 (24).jpg
    s-l1600 (24).jpg
    214.8 KB · Views: 263
  • s-l1600 (25).jpg
    s-l1600 (25).jpg
    172.7 KB · Views: 268
  • s-l1600 (26).jpg
    s-l1600 (26).jpg
    183.2 KB · Views: 265
  • s-l1600 (27).jpg
    s-l1600 (27).jpg
    181.5 KB · Views: 258
  • s-l1600 (28).jpg
    s-l1600 (28).jpg
    175 KB · Views: 253
  • s-l1600 (29).jpg
    s-l1600 (29).jpg
    173 KB · Views: 233
  • s-l1600 (30).jpg
    s-l1600 (30).jpg
    206.8 KB · Views: 238
  • s-l1600 (22).jpg
    s-l1600 (22).jpg
    240.6 KB · Views: 277
The nr 2 engine has a seemingly very small air inlet on the top of the fuselage. One would suspect it would be running at a lower capacity than the other two. Has any-one more info on this small intake?
 
The nr 2 engine has a seemingly very small air inlet on the top of the fuselage. One would suspect it would be running at a lower capacity than the other two. Has any-one more info on this small intake?

Engine nr 2 (rear) has revolving (around horizonytal axis) intake, capable to switch from closed to open position during flight.
 
Yes, I noticed that.The pictures depict the inlet in open position, and then it seems to me rather small.
 
The only thing missing from that model, that's obvious, is the plate at the wing root to cover the opening for the variable incidence wing. Having said that, I'm quite sure whoever modeled this doesn't know anything about that. It's nice looking, none the less.
 
The only thing missing from that model, that's obvious, is the plate at the wing root to cover the opening for the variable incidence wing. Having said that, I'm quite sure whoever modeled this doesn't know anything about that. It's nice looking, none the less.
I 1c.jpg 2c.jpg 4c.jpg 5c.jpg added plate and camouflage
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20240225_084916_Microsoft 365 (Office).jpg
    Screenshot_20240225_084916_Microsoft 365 (Office).jpg
    165.6 KB · Views: 217
  • Screenshot_20240225_084934_Microsoft 365 (Office).jpg
    Screenshot_20240225_084934_Microsoft 365 (Office).jpg
    80.8 KB · Views: 237
I just stumbled across this interesting article by by Tony R. Landis on the Air Force Materiel Command History Office (AFMC) website regarding Martin's proposed XB-51 carrying two of their MX-771 Matador winged missiles, on each wingtip.
Regards
Pioneer
https://www.afmc.af.mil/News/Articl...artin-xb-51-with-two-mx-771-matador-missiles/
Hello everyone,
here are some additional pictures I discovered on the website of the German aviation magazine "Flug Revue."
Some of these might have shared in this topic previously, so I kept the resolution small. :)
Sources (German, and behind a paywall):
https://www.flugrevue.de/klassiker/...dreistrahler-als-cruise-missile-mutterschiff/https://www.flugrevue.de/klassiker/...-xb-51-high-tech-dreistrahler-ohne-chance-v1/
 

Attachments

  • 20240705_Martin_XB-51_FlugRevue_007.jpg
    20240705_Martin_XB-51_FlugRevue_007.jpg
    88.6 KB · Views: 85
  • 20240705_Martin_XB-51_FlugRevue_008.jpg
    20240705_Martin_XB-51_FlugRevue_008.jpg
    193.8 KB · Views: 85
  • 20240705_Martin_XB-51_FlugRevue_009.jpg
    20240705_Martin_XB-51_FlugRevue_009.jpg
    93.4 KB · Views: 87
  • 20240705_Martin_XB-51_FlugRevue_010.jpg
    20240705_Martin_XB-51_FlugRevue_010.jpg
    169.6 KB · Views: 89
  • 20240705_Martin_XB-51_FlugRevue_011.jpg
    20240705_Martin_XB-51_FlugRevue_011.jpg
    142.8 KB · Views: 94
  • 20240705_Martin_XB-51_FlugRevue_012.jpg
    20240705_Martin_XB-51_FlugRevue_012.jpg
    99.8 KB · Views: 109
  • 20240705_Martin_XB-51_FlugRevue_013.jpg
    20240705_Martin_XB-51_FlugRevue_013.jpg
    127.1 KB · Views: 117
  • 20240705_Martin_XB-51_FlugRevue_006.jpg
    20240705_Martin_XB-51_FlugRevue_006.jpg
    117.7 KB · Views: 80
  • 20240705_Martin_XB-51_FlugRevue_005.jpg
    20240705_Martin_XB-51_FlugRevue_005.jpg
    149.1 KB · Views: 90
  • 20240303_Martin_XB-51_with_two_Matadors_FlugRevue_001.jpg
    20240303_Martin_XB-51_with_two_Matadors_FlugRevue_001.jpg
    141.6 KB · Views: 113
  • 20240303_Martin_XB-51_with_two_Matadors_FlugRevue_002.jpg
    20240303_Martin_XB-51_with_two_Matadors_FlugRevue_002.jpg
    108.8 KB · Views: 121
  • 20240303_Martin_XB-51_with_two_Matadors_FlugRevue_003.jpg
    20240303_Martin_XB-51_with_two_Matadors_FlugRevue_003.jpg
    55 KB · Views: 131
  • 20240705_Martin_XB-51_FlugRevue_001.jpg
    20240705_Martin_XB-51_FlugRevue_001.jpg
    140.9 KB · Views: 117
  • 20240705_Martin_XB-51_FlugRevue_002.jpg
    20240705_Martin_XB-51_FlugRevue_002.jpg
    169 KB · Views: 102
  • 20240705_Martin_XB-51_FlugRevue_003.jpg
    20240705_Martin_XB-51_FlugRevue_003.jpg
    121.7 KB · Views: 101
  • 20240705_Martin_XB-51_FlugRevue_004.jpg
    20240705_Martin_XB-51_FlugRevue_004.jpg
    95.1 KB · Views: 117
Last edited:
This short video about the XB-51 was uploaded on YT early today:


The Martin XB-51 was one of the most unique and experimental jet aircraft ever built in the U.S. Designed at the dawn of the jet age, this American trijet ground-attack aircraft was faster than many fighters of its time, featuring radical design choices like variable-incidence wings, rotating bomb bay, and a tandem landing gear system.​
This video dives deep into the design, development, flight history, crash incidents, and the ultimate fate of the Martin XB-51, comparing it to its Cold War contemporaries and explaining why it was rejected in favor of the English Electric Canberra.If you're passionate about rare aircraft, Cold War aviation, or forgotten experimental jets, this video is for you. Learn how this incredible jet nearly changed U.S. military aviation history—then disappeared.​
00:00 - Intro Retro Transport
00:05 - Martin XB-51 History
03:33 - Outro Retro Transport
 

Attachments

  • 061026-F-1234S-001.jpg
    061026-F-1234S-001.jpg
    148.3 KB · Views: 53
  • 061026-F-1234S-002.jpg
    061026-F-1234S-002.jpg
    323.4 KB · Views: 56
  • 061026-F-1234S-003.jpg
    061026-F-1234S-003.jpg
    237 KB · Views: 68
Hi,

why we didn't talk about its competition and the tenders,one of them was
Douglas Model-743 ?!.
 
Hi,

why we didn't talk about its competition and the tenders,one of them was
Douglas Model-743 ?!.

That's from this book,but I can't display the drawing,because it's still available.
 

Attachments

  • 5.png
    5.png
    40.4 KB · Views: 33
  • 6.png
    6.png
    645.3 KB · Views: 36
That's from this book,but I can't display the drawing,because it's still available.
So, not having the said book, and appreciating your reason for not displaying the drawing....
Is it fair to say that the Douglas competitive design was based on a similar layout to their XB-43 Jetmaster?

Regards
Pioneer
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom