Apophenia

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2007
Messages
2,792
Reaction score
1,356
Hawker P.1035 Hawk with F.2/43 Fury undercarriage. Source grade 1.

While searching for P.1035 images I came across the beginnings of a model by Paul Bradley (attached). Until seeing it, I hadn't considered the possibility that the P.1035 retained the tail-wheel undercarriage (a la Attacker).

http://gregers.7.forumer.com/viewtopic.php?t=2755&sid=22a37f4be2b9ade90018208725ce79bd

The model itself stays true to the Sea Hawk fuselage and intakes. But most descriptions say that the P.1035 was low-winged. The model canopy is also Sea Hawk (I've taken the written descriptions more literally and used the narrower Fury sliding canopy).

The long jetpipe I've based loosely on the Canadair CT-133 (which was also Nene-powered). A tricycle-gear version of this P.1035 is in Early Secret Projects.

http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,3574.0.html
 

Attachments

  • p1035-hawk-taildragger.jpg
    p1035-hawk-taildragger.jpg
    22.6 KB · Views: 375
  • p-1035-kit-bash.jpg
    p-1035-kit-bash.jpg
    18.7 KB · Views: 341

Apophenia

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2007
Messages
2,792
Reaction score
1,356
Justo,

I do believe you've discovered an intermediate design between P.1035 and P.1040. Low-mounted Fury wings but with the P.1040/Sea Hawk split jet pipes!
 

Antonio

ACCESS: Top Secret
Staff member
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2006
Messages
3,586
Reaction score
423
shows a 'Tempest winged' 'Hawk' with teardrop canopy like the prototype P.1040

Any possibility to see this pic posted here? ;)

Thanks in advance,
Antonio
 

Apophenia

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2007
Messages
2,792
Reaction score
1,356
As always, nice model Joe. And thanks for the P.1040 vs P.1035 clarification.
 

Alresfordian

I really should change my personal text
Joined
Jul 27, 2016
Messages
2
Reaction score
7

overscan (PaulMM)

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Messages
13,172
Reaction score
6,294
It should really be "of WWII" or "of the Second World War". No native speaker would say "of the WWII".
 

Justo Miranda

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2007
Messages
4,893
Reaction score
3,811
Website
www.amazon.com
Next Book;)

Great News! When will it be released?
Cheers
November
It should really be "of WWII" or "of the Second World War". No native speaker would say "of the WWII".
Is this release date still on? I definitely want to buy that book!
Publication of the book delayed till the second half of 2021:confused:
Contents​

  • The American Fighter
  • Curtiss P-36 and P-40 evolution
  • Curtiss XP-53 and XP-60 evolution
  • Curtiss XP-62
  • Curtiss XP-55
  • Curtiss XF14C
  • Republic P-47 Thunderbolt evolution
  • North American P-51 Mustang evolution
  • Davis Manta Fighter
  • Gluhareff Dart
  • Lockheed L-133 and XP-80 evolution
  • NACA-Langley-Jacobs-Jeep
  • Northrop Flying Wings
  • Vultee XP-54, XP-68 and XP-81
  • The British Fighter
  • Hawker Hurricane evolution
  • Supermarine Spitfire dead ends
  • Hawker Tornado and Typhoon evolution
  • Hawker Tempest and Fury
  • Blackburn B-37 Firebrand
  • Blackburn B-44
  • Blackburn B-48 Firecrest
  • Martin-Baker M.B.3, M.B.4 and M.B.5
  • Miles M.35 and M.43
  • Early British Jets
  • The French Fighter
  • Arsenal Projects
  • Sud-Est S.E. 582
  • The Soviet Fighter
  • Golovin ‘IVS’/’ISF’
  • Jurijev KIT-1
  • Nikitin-Shevchenko IS-4
  • Bibliography
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Top