• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

Hades IRBM (France)

scorp

CLEARANCE: Restricted
Joined
Mar 4, 2006
Messages
22
Reaction score
4
Would anyone possibly possess illustrations of the TEL for this missile, which was supposed to replace Pluton? Thanks.
 

flateric

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
8,772
Reaction score
191
Oh, thanks a lot!
 

cardonet

CLEARANCE: Confidential
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
72
Reaction score
3
flateric said:
Oh, thanks a lot!
You're welcome
I am not familiar with the interface. I suppose I used a wrong procedure trying to insert the image.
 

cador

CLEARANCE: Restricted
Joined
Jun 2, 2007
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
http://camions-militaires.winnerbb.com/l-artillerie-guidee-f34/le-systeme-hades-t794.htm :)
 

flateric

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
8,772
Reaction score
191
Grand merci! Fantastique!
 

flateric

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
8,772
Reaction score
191
...
 

Attachments

uk 75

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Joined
Sep 27, 2006
Messages
1,272
Reaction score
28
Does anyone know if the cunning Franch kept Hades in storage so that they can be used to counter Russia and give the EU an alternative to US weapons that may not be available?
 

Grey Havoc

The path not taken.
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
8,980
Reaction score
178
They were initially kept in storage for exactly such a contingency, but they were infamously ordered destroyed by President Chirac in 1996/97.
 

Forest Green

CLEARANCE: Secret
Joined
Jun 11, 2019
Messages
260
Reaction score
71
Does anyone know if the cunning Franch kept Hades in storage so that they can be used to counter Russia and give the EU an alternative to US weapons that may not be available?
For a while they did but the last were scrapped in 1997.
 
Last edited:

Grey Havoc

The path not taken.
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
8,980
Reaction score
178
A bit on the system and it's planned employment from French Security and Defence Policy: Current Developments and Future Prospects (Fredrik Wetterqvist, DIANE Publishing, 1990):
The Army's future prestrategic nuclear weapon, the mobile Hadès missile (dual-capable) with a 350-500 km range and ability to carry a 10-to-25 kt nuclear warhead, a neutron bomb, a conventional warhead or chemical agents, will replace the ageing Pluton SRBM in 1992. In April 1989, France, reportedly, could manufacture 200 Hadès missiles with 20-60 kt warheads, with an expected initial order of 90 units (Webster, 1989a:4). Other sources put the warhead capability at 80 to 100 kt (Westerlund 1990:44). The French Army plans to purchase altogether 180 Hadès missiles (SIPRI, 1989:32).

The Hadès division will comprise three artillery regiments, and the first will be installed with the 15th Artillery Regiement at Suippes in the Marne region of eastern France. The second will be stationed with the 3rd Regiment at Mailly in the Aube region, also in eastern France. The details concerning the final third have yet to be decided, but Belfort has been mentioned. The Hadès division will also have the RITA communications net, a Mistral surface-to-air missile battery and a support battalion (Isnard, 1989:419). The Hadès system will be disguised to resemble a semitrailer, which will be capable of carrying two 7.2 metres missiles with inertial guidance systems powered by solid propellant motors (Westerlund, 1990:44).

The French Chief of Defence Staff, General Maurice Schmitt, has said that France would not be prohibited from relocating the Hadès missile into the FRG, which is the case with the Pluton missile (Air et Cosmos, 1989b:5). Mitterrand has stated on several occasions that the missiles are only of 'final warning' characters and are not to be used as battlefield weapons. However, the fact is that if the missiles can be moved into the FRG, it will greatly expand French power alongside Allied forces, and may also serve to lower German anxiety that the missiles would fall on German territory.

The Hadès missile is supposed to be placed under the command of the of the Chief of Defence Staff, thereby, in fact, opening up the possibility of using it as a battlefield weapon. It also has the deterrent value in that it is permanently situated in Europe, because of its mobility, and is expected to be less easily intercepted by enemy missile defences. Critics say that it makes the doctrine of 'the weak against the strong' outdated, and is a step closer to the NATO doctrine of 'flexible response'. Supporters say that it is a sign that France no longer accepts isolation from its European allies, and has started to build on a common European defence (Isnard, 1988e:31).

Although the deployment of the Hadès missile has become increasingly sensitive because of the German unification plans, France has no plans to scrap the missiles. The Chief of Defence Staff, Maurice Schmitt reportedly said that the reduced force levels proposed so far in the START talks are still too high to attract French participation (Isnard, 1990e:28). According to Jaques Isnard, France could very well decide unilaterally to cut the Hadès regiments from three to two, but the possible use of the missiles will remain ambiguous. Minister of Defence Jean-Pierre Chevènement is even reported to have said that the old Tous Azimuths Doctrine is now more than ever real (see chapter 2). In other words, France's nuclear deterrent is not directed at any particular enemy, but in all directions...(Isnard, 1990e:28).
 
Last edited:

James1978

CLEARANCE: Restricted
Joined
Sep 6, 2006
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Does anyone know how large the conventional warhead would have been?
 

Grey Havoc

The path not taken.
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
8,980
Reaction score
178
I'm still looking though different sources, so I'm not sure if it was a unitary warhead, an ICM (Improved Cluster Munitions) equivalent, or a choice between the two. I have come across however that there was yet another nuclear warhead available, this one in the 150-300 kiloton range and intended for use against Soviet Operational Maneuver Groups before they could enter West Germany.
 

Forest Green

CLEARANCE: Secret
Joined
Jun 11, 2019
Messages
260
Reaction score
71
I'm still looking though different sources, so I'm not sure if it was a unitary warhead, an ICM (Improved Cluster Munitions) equivalent, or a choice between the two. I have come across however that there was yet another nuclear warhead available, this one in the 150-300 kiloton range and intended for use against Soviet Operational Maneuver Groups before they could enter West Germany.
Is that the one used on the ASMP/ASMP-A? The TN-80/81 had a 300kT and a weight of 200kg.

It was using DSMAC, so a unitary warhead seems more likely, since you don't really need a 5m CEP with cluster munitions. Not sure whether the range was the same as the nuclear version due to the heavier warhead though.
 
Last edited:

Grey Havoc

The path not taken.
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
8,980
Reaction score
178
Is that the one used on the ASMP/ASMP-A? The TN-80/81 had a 300kT and a weigh of 200kg.
It seems likely. Interestingly, the OMG countering mission was faded into the background (but not dropped) in 1988 when President Mitterrand assured Germany that Hades would not used against targets on German soil, east or west. It wasn't for nothing that Hades was nicknamed the 'Diplomatic Missile'.

Not sure whether the range was the same as the nuclear version due to the heavier warhead though.
The range of the conventional warhead would have been around 480km. The range with the 300kt warhead would have been just over 400km (enough to cover the Inner German Border). The full 500km range would have been with the default nuclear warhead. Range with the originally planned 25kt warhead would have probably been a fair bit more. No details available on the Enhanced Radiation Weapon [neutron bomb] warhead apart from the fact that it existed in at least prototype form (officially France hadn't built any, but they were very confident that they could deploy ERW warheads in a hurry if and when required). The range of the chemical warheads would have varied depending on what they were filled with, dispersion mode, etc.
 
Last edited:
Top