PHA's were planned before the PH 75 in the early 70's as a replacement for the Arromanches. It envolved into the more well-known PH-75. I'm hoping that the upcomming book by Moulin and Jordan about french carriers will give little more info of them.
 
PHA's were planned before the PH 75 in the early 70's as a replacement for the Arromanches. It envolved into the more well-known PH-75. I'm hoping that the upcomming book by Moulin and Jordan about french carriers will give little more info of them.
Thanks. I would really like to know when the design shifted to nuclear propulsion.
 
As for the blunt or "axe" bow in French submarines, they seemed to prefer it in the 1960's design and did not adopt proper teardrop shape until with the Amethyste and Le Triomphant. I don't know the exact reason.

Data on the PHA:s is limited to what is written in the Conway's All the world Fighting Ships section about PH 75: It states that the preceeding conventional designs were of 20,000-22,000t waterline lenght of 187-200m and speed 27kts. They were supposed to have the 55,000shp machinery as in C67 (Tourville class).
 
Data on the PHA:s is limited to what is written in the Conway's All the world Fighting Ships section about PH 75: It states that the preceeding conventional designs were of 20,000-22,000t waterline lenght of 187-200m and speed 27kts. They were supposed to have the 55,000shp machinery as in C67 (Tourville class).
Probably much cheaper than nuclear powered PH75?
 
Last edited:
Are there any details on the French nuclear surface combatant proposals? I believe it is discussed in this book but I am not French, nor do I speak the language so I really am not sure
 

Attachments

  • 1761385105376.png
    1761385105376.png
    177 KB · Views: 27
Back
Top Bottom