gollevainen
ACCESS: Confidential
- Joined
- 2 May 2007
- Messages
- 165
- Reaction score
- 400
Thanks. I would really like to know when the design shifted to nuclear propulsion.PHA's were planned before the PH 75 in the early 70's as a replacement for the Arromanches. It envolved into the more well-known PH-75. I'm hoping that the upcomming book by Moulin and Jordan about french carriers will give little more info of them.
Why the blunt bow for SSN? An attempt to save money be using SSBN design? In general, why did the French accept a teardrop hull so late?Here's couple submarine designs: E48 preluded the Narval class and the two iterations of the SNC 68 were nuclear attack submarines projects prior the SNA 72 Rubis class.
View attachment 784833View attachment 784849View attachment 784850
What would be dimensions of that project?PHA helicopter carrier designs:View attachment 784867View attachment 784868 View attachment 784869View attachment 784870
Probably much cheaper than nuclear powered PH75?Data on the PHA:s is limited to what is written in the Conway's All the world Fighting Ships section about PH 75: It states that the preceeding conventional designs were of 20,000-22,000t waterline lenght of 187-200m and speed 27kts. They were supposed to have the 55,000shp machinery as in C67 (Tourville class).
Never seen the SNC 68 before, although I did knew its existence! Thanks a lot!Here's couple submarine designs: E48 preluded the Narval class and the two iterations of the SNC 68 were nuclear attack submarines projects prior the SNA 72 Rubis class.
View attachment 784833View attachment 784849View attachment 784850
Very kind, thank youhttps://lefauteuildecolbert.blogspot.com/2015/04/vers-une-marine-atomique-la-marine.html
Machine translation attached