• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

EE P42 and successor studies

zen

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2007
Messages
1,836
Reaction score
589
This is my first attempt having scanned through extent threads for this and not finding it.
Its EE's military successor concept for after the P.42 flights building on the hypersonic knowledge gained.

I forget the number and the magazine source right now and will get back to you when I dig it out to refresh my memory. Orriginal source is in the picture.


Viewed as a fighter for RAF and RN use.
AAM's where supposed to be submerged on the upper inner wing surface apparently.
 

Antonio

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Staff member
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2006
Messages
3,450
Reaction score
158
Many thanks for your contribution, Zen.. What an amazing design!

I can recall which issue but I read an article in Air International many years ago that told something like this: “Fast jets were replaced by faster jets until the 70’s. Eurofighter could have been a Mach 4 aircraft, but advances in SAM technology forced aircraft to fly low and modern fighters top speed is between 1,5 and 2,5 Mach”.

Thanks to your post I can see what a real Mach 4 fighter could have look. I love the “drop-nose” feature.

Hey Archibald and the boys at whatifmodelers forum, that makes a great start for an “Alternative RAF for the 90’s” topic! I’d love to see this beast in Royal Navy colours ::)

cheers

Antonio
 

Archibald

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2006
Messages
3,713
Reaction score
1,267
Yeah, an alternate world with mach 5+ operational fighters ;D
Red Flag 2002 with the Dassault mach 4+ design (more to come in Le Fana de l'aviation soon) and this EE. design...
 

lark

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2006
Messages
1,803
Reaction score
63
Three view drawing comes from:

'Air Pictorial ' May 1999
Article :Hypersonic high-flyers. English Electric Secrets of the Sixties-part II
by Chris Gibson.
 

zen

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2007
Messages
1,836
Reaction score
589
Correct, but missed the number which was EAG44___something.
 

robunos

You're Mad, You Are.....
Senior Member
Joined
May 1, 2007
Messages
1,859
Reaction score
195
zen said:
Correct, but missed the number which was EAG44___something.

from the article, i believe it to be the EAG 4427, but the picture is not captioned as such, and the article also mentions the EAG 4426, which was to be larger, TSR2 as opposed to Lightning sized and which was similar,but differed in detail.

Cheers,
Robin.
 

danielgrimes

CLEARANCE: Confidential
Joined
Oct 8, 2007
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
The SR-71 started life as the YF-12, so a high supersonic speed fighter was built, albeit converted into a recycle role. The Mig-25 was also theoretically capable of a decent tip speed.

For 'fighter' do we mean Air Superiority (where the fighter will combat other fighters) or Air Intercept (where the fighter will combat other bombers). High speed is good for the latter, but not as important for the former. Air to Air missile technology as well as Surface to Air missiles has also had a significate bearing on the need not to have such advanced aircraft.
 

hesham

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
26,125
Reaction score
3,027

Attachments

Stargazer2006

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2009
Messages
13,241
Reaction score
398
danielg said:
The SR-71 started life as the YF-12
Not so. Both derived from the A-12, but the SR-71 came first.
 

TomS

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2008
Messages
3,919
Reaction score
847
Stargazer2006 said:
danielg said:
The SR-71 started life as the YF-12
Not so. Both derived from the A-12, but the SR-71 came first.
Actually, no. The YF-12 was first, by about sixteen months (first flights August 1963 vs. December 1964). But I believe it is true that the YF-12 and SR-71 are separate forks off the A-12 tree, rather then being a straight line development.
 

Useful Dave

CLEARANCE: Restricted
Joined
Jul 20, 2010
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
My apologies for a bit of a bump here, but it didn't seem worth creating an entirely new thread purely to question a few bits of viability. Considering the amount of fuel which might have been carried by the EAG.4427, would it have had a combat-radius sufficient for it to actually serve sufficiently within the strike-role without excessive buddy-tanking from another aircraft?


It's just a point of curiosity that hit me reading through Tony Butler's section upon them.
 

hesham

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
26,125
Reaction score
3,027
lark said:
Three view drawing comes from:

'Air Pictorial ' May 1999
Article :Hypersonic high-flyers. English Electric Secrets of the Sixties-part II
by Chris Gibson.

Also from the same source,


here is a variant of P.42 and the EAG.4397,the last one was a 100 passenger
transport version of P.42.
 

Attachments

hesham

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
26,125
Reaction score
3,027
Thank you Chris,


I have this book,but I can't send any drawings from it.
 

Stargazer2006

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2009
Messages
13,241
Reaction score
398
Jens, were the first and third project meant to be stealthy? They sure seem to evade forum posting... Completely blank pictures!
 

martinbayer

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Joined
Jan 6, 2009
Messages
681
Reaction score
155
Looks like the EAG 3273 and the EAG 4427 were stealth designs... ;)

Just saw Skyblazer beat me to the punch!

Martin
 

Jemiba

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2006
Messages
8,183
Reaction score
808
Stealth designs indeed, visible only to the believers in stealth, just like the fairy tale "The Emperor's
New Clothes" !
Sorry, have attached the drawings again, they should be visible now. :-\
 

Archibald

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2006
Messages
3,713
Reaction score
1,267
Courtesy of the Internet Archive
https://web.archive.org/web/20071030063922/http://www.bisbos.com/rocketscience/aircraft/hyper/p42.html
 

blackkite

Don't laugh, don't cry, don't even curse, but.....
Joined
May 31, 2007
Messages
7,169
Reaction score
2,228
What is the objective of this design?(EAG.3280)
 

Attachments

Last edited:

Archibald

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2006
Messages
3,713
Reaction score
1,267
How close did the P.42 really come, from being build ? Avro 730 level ?
 

Schneiderman

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
1,390
Reaction score
359
That comment from britmodeller.com is a bit misleading as it implies that Petter was involved in the design of the P.42. He had resigned from EE in early 1950
 

blackkite

Don't laugh, don't cry, don't even curse, but.....
Joined
May 31, 2007
Messages
7,169
Reaction score
2,228
Some Russian site shows us naval strike version. Please check yourself.
 
Last edited:

blackkite

Don't laugh, don't cry, don't even curse, but.....
Joined
May 31, 2007
Messages
7,169
Reaction score
2,228

Attachments

Last edited:

blackkite

Don't laugh, don't cry, don't even curse, but.....
Joined
May 31, 2007
Messages
7,169
Reaction score
2,228
Air Pictorial 1999-05 / C.Gibson - Hypersonic high-flyers : English Electric's secrets of the 'Sixties (2)
Thanks a lot Gibson-san!!
Naval strike version. Please take care for folding nose.
 

Attachments

blackkite

Don't laugh, don't cry, don't even curse, but.....
Joined
May 31, 2007
Messages
7,169
Reaction score
2,228
Great find nickwspoon-san!!
This model looks like follwing picture.
Maybe smaller space ship was located top of the booster and disappeared now?
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Top