• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

RAF Manned Capsule

Grif

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
Jan 19, 2008
Messages
52
Reaction score
2
I have heard somewhere that the Royal air Force issued a specification around 1960-odd for a manned space capsule, but it's still classified - does anyone know anything about this, and could a "Freedom of Information" request get it into public knowledge?
Grif
 

XP67_Moonbat

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Jan 16, 2008
Messages
2,164
Reaction score
98
I think FOIA only applies to US documents. I'm not sure how it works out for UK documents. But good luck on that.

Moonbat
 

Barrington Bond

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
May 4, 2007
Messages
937
Reaction score
153
http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,2946.0.html

:-\

Regards,
Barry
 

blackstar

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2008
Messages
1,828
Reaction score
312
There is apparently a British equivalent to the US FOIA. If you're interested in pursuing this, then you're going to have to do some research on the UK laws.

However, in these cases, blind shots in the dark are not the best approach. Do some research ahead of time and try to figure out exactly what you are looking for and who is likely to have it. Sometimes you don't have to make a formal request at all and documents are already declassified but in a collection, or simply not made public. So if you do some legwork ahead of time you may dramatically increase your chances of getting the information.
 

fredgell

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
Jun 10, 2007
Messages
77
Reaction score
11
It's not unheard of for copies and commentary on British projects to be hiding in US archives.
FOIA may well be relevant - the problem, as above, is knowing where to look.

Regards

Fred
 

blackstar

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2008
Messages
1,828
Reaction score
312
fredgell said:
It's not unheard of for copies and commentary on British projects to be hiding in US archives.
FOIA may well be relevant - the problem, as above, is knowing where to look.

That's like looking under the streetlight for your keys because that's where the light is. If you want to find information on British projects, look in British archives, not American ones.
 

Rickshaw

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
2,072
Reaction score
177
blackstar said:
fredgell said:
It's not unheard of for copies and commentary on British projects to be hiding in US archives.
FOIA may well be relevant - the problem, as above, is knowing where to look.

That's like looking under the streetlight for your keys because that's where the light is. If you want to find information on British projects, look in British archives, not American ones.

Depends on what you're looking for. I'd suggest that its more than likely easier to research joint UK/US projects in the US Archives than in the British Archives. BTW, there have been several well researched Australian/US joint intelligence projects and bases which have been far easier to research in the US archives because of the Australian security classifications which ensure such things remain "black" for ever, essentially. Professor Des Ball made quite a lucrative living out of publishing such things until he was co-opted by the US DoD and decided that it was more lucrative working on the inside of the tent.
 

Spark

ACCESS: Secret
Joined
Aug 29, 2008
Messages
361
Reaction score
48
rickshaw said:
blackstar said:
fredgell said:
It's not unheard of for copies and commentary on British projects to be hiding in US archives.
FOIA may well be relevant - the problem, as above, is knowing where to look.

That's like looking under the streetlight for your keys because that's where the light is. If you want to find information on British projects, look in British archives, not American ones.

Depends on what you're looking for. I'd suggest that its more than likely easier to research joint UK/US projects in the US Archives than in the British Archives. BTW, there have been several well researched Australian/US joint intelligence projects and bases which have been far easier to research in the US archives because of the Australian security classifications which ensure such things remain "black" for ever, essentially. Professor Des Ball made quite a lucrative living out of publishing such things until he was co-opted by the US DoD and decided that it was more lucrative working on the inside of the tent.

The RAF looked at manned capsules in the fifties. No details other than in one case they were considered for launching when attached to a space station. For the reason that at that time it was not certain if it was possible for two vehicles to orbit and dock with any degree of certainty. Interesting because the OR was for ten man crew to give twenty four hour mission coverage so it could have been a big return capsule? An eight RZ2 launch vehicle was considered necessary for this mission.
By the end of the fifties it must have been thought possible to dock because the effort was switching to a modular built space station serviced either with smaller manned space capsules or the preferred solution with two Space Planes on station at any one time to maintain a rota to for all year coverage. Just look at 6A and 6B gantries sized to cater for the space plane and cargo craft and the main effort had switched to the Four and Five RZ2 boosters as a more flexible economic solution

I have had to use American sources and private UK archives. The official UK archives have been to well weeded to be of any real use.
 

Grey Havoc

The path not taken.
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
15,183
Reaction score
4,917
May be related or derived:
Barrington Bond said:
Hawker Siddeley Advanced Projects Group Observation Satellite. Flugkorper 1960 Heft 10.
index.php
 

CNH

ACCESS: Top Secret
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2010
Messages
503
Reaction score
534
There was actually an OR - 9001.

In the PRO, you will find a very long study for the vehicle in question carried out by the RAE. Like most RAE studies, it was completely divorced from reality. Here's a pic:
 

Attachments

  • spaceplane2.gif
    spaceplane2.gif
    13.6 KB · Views: 1,715

CJGibson

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2011
Messages
1,536
Reaction score
891
There is a brief outline of OR.9001 and OR.9002 (counter satellite system) in BSP.4. As CNH says, the RAE were somewhat divorced from reality. There was also a (possibly) more realistic OR.9003 for a recon sat/vehicle.

Chris
 

PMN1

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2006
Messages
828
Reaction score
325
Amy weights and dimensions for the spaceplane?
 

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
27,996
Reaction score
5,287
CNH said:
There was actually an OR - 9001.

In the PRO, you will find a very long study for the vehicle in question carried out by the RAE. Like most RAE studies, it was completely divorced from reality. Here's a pic:


Great find CNH.
 

Michel Van

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2007
Messages
5,081
Reaction score
1,605
Here a RAF space Capsule
index.php

it's from the 1962 british Royal tournament, were the British military force present them self
http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,8119.msg151833.html#msg151833
 

carmelo

ACCESS: Secret
Joined
Mar 11, 2009
Messages
220
Reaction score
9
Was for one or two astronauts?
Was capable of rendez vous,docking with target vehicles,EVAs?
 

OM

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Jun 22, 2008
Messages
752
Reaction score
24
Website
www.io.com

Grey Havoc

The path not taken.
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
15,183
Reaction score
4,917
On a tangent: http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,1363.0.html
 

Spark

ACCESS: Secret
Joined
Aug 29, 2008
Messages
361
Reaction score
48
Tom Kerr said the RAF space-plane was still embryonic,---Three crew, spacemen, three week sortie or Five man ferry mission to space station, and very much bigger. The Tournament was for public consumption, entertainment so the capsule in the photo was make-believe. The suit real, the helmet???

carmelo said:
Was for one or two astronauts?
Was capable of rendez vous,docking with target vehicles,EVAs?
 

Michel Van

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2007
Messages
5,081
Reaction score
1,605
Spark said:
Tom Kerr said the RAF space-plane was still embryonic,---Three crew, spacemen, three week sortie or Five man ferry mission to space station, and very much bigger. The Tournament was for public consumption, entertainment so the capsule in the photo was make-believe. The suit real, the helmet???


So fare i know, is the Suit and helmet, a real desgin for high altitude suit prototype for RAF
 

Spark

ACCESS: Secret
Joined
Aug 29, 2008
Messages
361
Reaction score
48
Hi,
Both real, but they do not appear to match, may be I am Wrong but the appear to be different generations?


Michel Van said:
Spark said:
Tom Kerr said the RAF space-plane was still embryonic,---Three crew, spacemen, three week sortie or Five man ferry mission to space station, and very much bigger. The Tournament was for public consumption, entertainment so the capsule in the photo was make-believe. The suit real, the helmet???


So fare i know, is the Suit and helmet, a real desgin for high altitude suit prototype for RAF
 

Barrington Bond

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
May 4, 2007
Messages
937
Reaction score
153
Is it not this suit, Full Pressure Suit Type B, with perhaps one of the two helmets on the right?
 

Attachments

  • IMG.jpg
    IMG.jpg
    419.4 KB · Views: 294
  • British%20Pressure%20Helmets%20Zipper%20One%2001.jpg
    British%20Pressure%20Helmets%20Zipper%20One%2001.jpg
    41.3 KB · Views: 276

Spark

ACCESS: Secret
Joined
Aug 29, 2008
Messages
361
Reaction score
48
Hi the suit has the "Handbag" for emergency decompression on a aircraft,
or Space station, or Re enrty vehicle. Could have been used with a leotard like suit.!!!



Barrington Bond said:
Is it not this suit, Full Pressure Suit Type B, with perhaps one of the two helmets on the right?
 

Similar threads

Top