DD 21, DD(X), DDG-1000 Zumwalt Concepts

Triton

Donald McKelvy
Senior Member
Joined
14 August 2009
Messages
9,707
Reaction score
2,049
Website
deeptowild.blogspot.com
Artist impressions of land-attack destroyer using the "Sea Blade" design by Lockheed Martin. Lockheed Martin would later use the "Sea Blade" design for the Freedom-class littoral combat ship.

Source:
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ship/dd-21.htm
 

Attachments

  • dd21_2.gif
    dd21_2.gif
    86.8 KB · Views: 1,312
  • dd-21-2.jpg
    dd-21-2.jpg
    19 KB · Views: 1,173
  • dd-21-3.jpg
    dd-21-3.jpg
    39.4 KB · Views: 1,185
Anyone got hi-res?
 

Attachments

  • ddg_main_485.jpg
    ddg_main_485.jpg
    21.7 KB · Views: 1,134
  • ddg_ss_night.jpg
    ddg_ss_night.jpg
    14.1 KB · Views: 1,094
Artist's impression of United Defense concept.

An artist's stylized concept of a land-attack missile destroyer, showing a ship with a very small RCS, a large vertical-launch missile battery, and two 155-mm long-range guns (one aft of the superstructure). Such a design would be a major departure from previous surface ships, which have substantial RCS and infrared signatures. The DD 21 is shown with conformal radar and communication antennas. (United Defense)

Sources:
The Naval Institute Guide to the Ships and Aircraft of the US Fleet, Seventeenth Edition by Norman Polmar, Naval Institute Press, 2001

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ship/dd-21.htm
 

Attachments

  • DD21.gif
    DD21.gif
    87 KB · Views: 243
  • dd-21-line.gif
    dd-21-line.gif
    4.1 KB · Views: 213
  • dd-21_sc2.jpg
    dd-21_sc2.jpg
    55.6 KB · Views: 193
  • dd-21-pict-litoral.jpg
    dd-21-pict-litoral.jpg
    56.1 KB · Views: 207
  • dd-21-pict-horizontal.jpg
    dd-21-pict-horizontal.jpg
    42.7 KB · Views: 210
  • 7471_210607120314.jpg
    7471_210607120314.jpg
    19.1 KB · Views: 253
  • 7471_210607120327.jpg
    7471_210607120327.jpg
    15.7 KB · Views: 311
Artist impressions of an Ingalls Shipbuilding, now part of Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding, land-attack destroyer concept.

Source:
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ship/dd-21.htm
 

Attachments

  • dd-21-line3-scale.gif
    dd-21-line3-scale.gif
    4.9 KB · Views: 299
  • dd-21-ingalls2.jpg
    dd-21-ingalls2.jpg
    52.2 KB · Views: 297
Artist's impression of electromagnetic rail gun installed on DD(X).

Projectiles fired from an electromagnetic railgun will travel up to 290 miles in less than six minutes, exiting the atmosphere before hurling into their target at a velocity of 5,000 feet per second. The force of the impact will obliterate targets without an explosive aid.

Source:
http://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/2004-06/electromagnetic-railgun
 

Attachments

  • tech0604magnet_730x550.jpg
    tech0604magnet_730x550.jpg
    43.8 KB · Views: 458
From an old 2002 USN budget document relating to FY2003:
Distributive Aperture System:
Initiate:
(U) For Surface Ships, the Navy will launch a technology program (FY02 through FY06) for a ship based Distributive
Aperture System (DAS) Infrared Search and Track (IRST) for transition to DDX, CGX, and CVNX. The staring IRST system
will enable a passive self-protection capability for U.S surface ships. The system will address the need for low
radar cross-section sensor for surface naval ships. The system will provide 360-degree staring panoramic view and
awareness at-sea and in port of the surface, air, and asymmetric target set. Each module of the staring system will
consist of focal plane arrays, anemorphic optics, stabilization, and modularization techniques. The ship’s combat
center will control the DAS through a central computer high-speed processor. The DAS, consisting of eight modules
for surface combatant ships will vary based on the size of ship. It will provide surface ships with a 360-degree
panoramic staring view on the horizon to line of sight, and be able to detect, declare, and track air contacts and
surface contacts within 2-3 seconds. The sensor modules will also be able to pan its view downward to view the
surface from the ship to line of sight for in port counterterrorism awareness. DAS will address the surface naval
ships needs for a passive fighting and in-port security ability. The Navy will demonstrate a three-module prototype
with a high-speed central computer in FY06. It is critical to demonstrate the technique to seam stitch three sensors
panoramic view.
 
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a511508.pdf
 
.....
 

Attachments

  • dd21.jpg
    dd21.jpg
    22 KB · Views: 329
  • DD-21.jpg
    DD-21.jpg
    21 KB · Views: 295
  • dd-21-image7.jpg
    dd-21-image7.jpg
    35.9 KB · Views: 275
A lineup of alternative hull forms considered for SC-21. These are not all designed to equal capabilities. The two ships to the top of the image have fewer VLS cells and no VGAS (the little bright circles near the superstructure in the lower two ships)

1645552553469.png
 
SC-21 COEA Concept 3B1 "Littoral Combatant". This concept was chosen to be moved forward into the next stage of production (the DD(X) program), and is now the Zumwalt-class destroyer. This drawing is from Norman Friedman's U.S. Destroyers: An Illustrated Design History (Revised Edition), and is dated around 1995, right after the SC-21 programs started. The "VGAS" it mentions is the "Vertical Gun for Advanced Ships", and was ultimately developed into the AGS. It can be seen here in this poorly scaled image I posted below. Note everything except the barrel would be below the deck, and it would take up the same space a 61/64-cell Mk 41 block. It could only fire guided shells. I believe the radars it mentioned where later developed into the SPY-4 and SPY-3.
1646183989104.png
1646184073633.png
 
This document from the Government Accountability Office briefly covers the 2009 Radar/Hull Study and some of the Zumwalt-derivatives covered by it.
 

Attachments

  • Arleigh Burke Destroyers_ Additional Analysis and Oversight Required to __Support the Navy’s F...pdf
    1.8 MB · Views: 47
A pair of videos from 2002 and 2003 outlining various scenarios in which the Advanced Gun System would be used.

In case the links below ever go down, Wayback Machine Links are here for the 2002 video and here for the 2003 video.

A few points of interest:

1) The models used are of the Gold Team DD-21 Design.

2) The use of DPICM rounds.

3) In the first, and slightly earlier video, the AGS mountings are shown to be capable of loading at elevations below 90 degrees, and are described as being capable of firing at 12rpm. In the second video they return to vertical and are described as being capable of firing at 10rpm, suggesting that the derating of rpm and shift to simpler loading cycle took place around 2002-2003.

View: https://youtu.be/pg1uHRVx8-I


View: https://youtu.be/ilwIhIwf5yI
 
Last edited:
Army fired the BAE HVP guided projectile 110+km developed for the Navy Electromagnetic Rail Gun as the XM1155 sub-caliber program from a 155 mm XM907E2 58 caliber cannon March 29

Cancel the approx.$3 billion conversion of the Zumwalts to fire the hypersonic CPS missiles and just re-barrel the AGS 155mm guns and save a couple of $billions.:)

https://www.baesystems.com/en/article/bae-systems-successfully-tests-guided-projectile
 
Army fired the BAE HVP guided projectile 110+km developed for the Navy Electromagnetic Rail Gun as the XM1155 sub-caliber program from a 155 mm XM907E2 58 caliber cannon March 29

Cancel the approx.$3 billion conversion of the Zumwalts to fire the hypersonic CPS missiles and just re-barrel the AGS 155mm guns and save a couple of $billions.:)

https://www.baesystems.com/en/article/bae-systems-successfully-tests-guided-projectile

How much to turn HVP from a science experiment into a deployed weapon?

And how does it fulfill the role envisaged for CPS?
 
Army fired the BAE HVP guided projectile 110+km developed for the Navy Electromagnetic Rail Gun as the XM1155 sub-caliber program from a 155 mm XM907E2 58 caliber cannon March 29

Cancel the approx.$3 billion conversion of the Zumwalts to fire the hypersonic CPS missiles and just re-barrel the AGS 155mm guns and save a couple of $billions.:)

https://www.baesystems.com/en/article/bae-systems-successfully-tests-guided-projectile

How much to turn HVP from a science experiment into a deployed weapon?

And how does it fulfill the role envisaged for CPS?
The cost of the HVP would be a tiny fraction of $billions being spent on developing the CPS/LRHW

What is the role and business case for Zumwalt CPS, expect max deployment will be one of the three ships at current Navy maintenance rates, so a total of 12 missiles would be operationally available which think will have minimum token impact going by the massive amounts of munitions we are seeing being expended in Ukraine month in, month out.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom