Vought JTACMS/ATACMS (MGM-140)

SAM-SLAM summer series continues.

The strike was carried out using 5 ATACMS ballistic missiles.Losses:
• 2 S-300/400 air defense missile launchers were destroyed;
• 1 S-300/400 air defense missile launcher was damaged;
• Radar “96L6E” was destroyed;
• The control center of the S-300/400 air defense system was destroyed;

https://twitter.com/x/status/1793629402984488974

Interesting little bit of info. The radar was actually a 96L6-TsP, which some S-400s now use. It is associated with the new S-500 and has been upgraded from cheese board to cheese grater here.
interestingengineering.com

Russia's S-500 Defense System Is Ready To Launch. Is It the Ultimate F-35 Killer?

What about S-500 makes it so fearsome for stealth fighter jets?
interestingengineering.com interestingengineering.com

Alleged 3,500km detection range.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1793648233828450311
View: https://x.com/GuyPlopsky/status/1793648233828450311

https://twitter.com/x/status/1793891915727073694
View: https://x.com/bayraktar_1love/status/1793891915727073694

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUl9iz_A_Sc

1716576620433.png
 
Last edited:
www.twz.com

Ukraine Can Now Use U.S.-Supplied Weapons To Strike Inside Russia

The White House has officially granted Kyiv's wish of allowing it to shoot back at Russian positions across the border with U.S. weapons.
www.twz.com www.twz.com

As Ukrainian's second-largest city has been pounded by Russian missile, glide bomb and artillery strikes, officials in Kyiv have begged the U.S. to allow the use of donated long-range weapons to strike back across the border, into Russia directly. Now that is going to happen.
Click to expand...
In a major policy shift, the Biden administration “recently” approved Ukraine’s use of U.S.-supplied weapons on Russian territory, but only near Kharkiv, two U.S. officials confirmed to The War Zone. Ukraine has long been barred by the U.S. from using weapons it has donated against targets in Russia proper.
Click to expand...
“The President recently directed his team to ensure that Ukraine is able to use U.S.-supplied weapons for counter-fire purposes in the Kharkiv region so Ukraine can hit back against Russian forces that are attacking them or preparing to attack them," a U.S. official told The War Zone. "Our policy with respect to prohibiting the use of [Army Tactical Missile System] ATACMS or long range strikes inside of Russia has not changed.”
Click to expand...

Germany follows suit:

www.spiegel.de

Bundesregierung erlaubt Ukraine Angriffe auf Ziele in Russland mit deutschen Waffen

Die Ukraine darf mit aus Deutschland geliefertem Kriegsgerät auch auf russisches Gebiet feuern. Das will die Ampelregierung nach SPIEGEL-Informationen nun doch gestatten. Auch andere westliche Partner erlauben dies.
www.spiegel.de www.spiegel.de
 
Last edited:
MihoshiK said:
I forsee a large increase in smoking accidents.
Click to expand...
The question is how 'preparing an attack' will be interpreted. I think it's a given that ground based artillery, MLRS and tactical missile launchers plus supporting personnel, equipment, field depots and troop deployment areas will be covered by this, but is an Su-34 being loaded up with glide bombs at an airfield not also preparing an attack? That's the question. Certainly once they're in the air Ukraine will be able to hit them with SAMs before they launch now at least. But there's certainly a grey area around the 'preparing to attack' clause.
 
Forest Green said:
The question is how 'preparing an attack' will be interpreted. I think it's a given that ground based artillery, MLRS and tactical missile launchers plus supporting personnel, equipment, field depots and troop deployment areas will be covered by this, but is an Su-34 being loaded up with glide bombs at an airfield not also preparing an attack? That's the question. Certainly once they're in the air Ukraine will be able to hit them with SAMs before they launch now at least. But there's certainly a grey area around the 'preparing to attack' clause.
Click to expand...
I think that Ukraine is going to take the widest possible interpretation and smack anything that looks like it might be aimed at them. Which is basically everything the Russian military has. Because it is.
 
MihoshiK said:
I think that Ukraine is going to take the widest possible interpretation and smack anything that looks like it might be aimed at them. Which is basically everything the Russian military has. Because it is.
Click to expand...
Question is whether they're allowed to do that, but some cross-border capability is better than none though.
 
Josh_TN said:
Honestly doesn’t look that bad. There doesn’t seem to have been a secondary fire.
Click to expand...

They haven't shown the damage below decks and as for a secondary fire I'd only expect that to happen if the warhead had detonated inside one of the ferry's fuel-bunkers and/or if it was carrying ammunition.
 
NMaude said:
They haven't shown the damage below decks and as for a secondary fire I'd only expect that to happen if the warhead had detonated inside one of the ferry's fuel-bunkers and/or if it was carrying ammunition.
Click to expand...

There’s plenty of things on a ship that will burn outside of fuel and munitions. Those are just the hardest to come back from. It isn’t like this platform would have much of a crew or damage control, but also a ballistic missile does not deliver unused jet fuel to a target the way most any sea skimmer would.
 
While the damage appears to be superficial as I've said we haven't seen below decks footage and I wouldn't be surprised at all if the ship's hull has suffered serious structural damage rendering it unseaworthy.
 
NMaude said:
While the damage appears to be superficial as I've said we haven't seen below decks footage and I wouldn't be surprised at all if the ship's hull has suffered serious structural damage rendering it unseaworthy.
Click to expand...

Eh, it still floats. Could go either way.
 
Moscow Times has published this, although I'm not sure they have the correct end of the stick. I'm not sure the 'longer-ranged ATACMS' can be used based on other sources, although whether than means no 300km ATACMS or no 165km or 300km ATACMS I'm not sure. However, it would be difficult to resist targeting Iskander-Ms about to launch on Kyiv off their Eastern border.

www.themoscowtimes.com

Ukraine Can Strike (Some) Targets in Russia with U.S. Weapons. What Now? - The Moscow Times

The United States on Thursday finally joined a growing number of its NATO allies in allowing Ukraine to use weapons donated by the West to strike military targets on Russian territory.
www.themoscowtimes.com www.themoscowtimes.com

1717231908251.png
 
GPALNmpWQAEtCVB


Image reportedly of the magazine detonation of the Karakurt-class corvette Tsiklon after being struck by a unitary warhead ATACMs.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom