• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

Vought F-8 Projects

Pioneer

Seek out and close with the enemy
Senior Member
Joined
May 22, 2006
Messages
1,676
Reaction score
46
I was flicking through some of my old magazine extracts that I have collected over the years (a photocopy when photo copiers were as amazing as computers are today!). I came across an article about the Vought IF-8 Crusader.
It was apparently a proposal of based on the Vought F-8D Crusader to the Luftwaffe for a supersonic fighter, at the time that the Luftwaffe was assessing the English Electric Lightning, Mirage III, J35 Draken, XF11F-2 Super Tiger and the F-104 Starfighter to replace its Sabres and F-84’s.
The IF-8 Crusader was to have had a General Electric J79-GE-17 Turbojet, in place of the normal Pratt & Whitney J57 turbojet; increased internal fuel capacity, and a so-called USAF cockpit and modified offensive weapons.
As history has shown, Germany chose the Lockheed F-104G Starfighter.

Does anyone know anything about the Vought IF-8 Crusader?
Or was this just the V-1000? ???

Regards
Pioneer
 

Skybolt

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2006
Messages
2,297
Reaction score
40
V-1000 is from 1969. The German (and Italian) program was from the start of the '60s. This project is intriguing. It seems it never received a V-number. Don't know if the V8-U2 (later F-8D) airframe could receive a J-79 without major modifications. Idea, what if it was the F8-U3 reborn? It was offered to the USAF with a specific version (don't remember the V-) and the engine was the J-75...
 

elmayerle

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2006
Messages
1,277
Reaction score
29
J79 as a replacement for the J57 is reasonable, the thrust is the same and the overall engine envelope is a bit less. That would make sense in a lot of ways. *grin* That the chief engineer behind the J79 was an Americanized German (by way of the AVG, no less) would not have hurt. Using the J75 would've required the larger airframe of the F8U-3 since the J75 was essentially an enlarged J57.
 

Archibald

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2006
Messages
2,740
Reaction score
308
So there were two proposals for a J-79 crusader (IF-8 / V-1000) ???

The Crusader is well known for its brilliant performances over Vietnam. At a time, it was the only valuable fighter in the american arsenal (the Phantom has its difficulties, the F-104 was a turkey. what else ?)

Now, this was achieved with the old and heavy J-57 engine...

I compared the J-57 with the J-79 some weeks ago (on the whatif forum ;)) .
Just wanted to say that the J-57 was 2300 kg and 6.20 m long. Diameter in 1.15m
On the other hand, the J-79 was only 1600 kg and...5 m long. Diameter = 1.05 m !

For a roughly equal thrust(7800 kgp or so). Can you imagine the benefits of changing a J-57 for a J-79 ? :eek:

This plane would have been ideal for the Essex carriers, which were too small for Phantoms (I mean, J-79 powered variants. Americanised spey Phantoms were proposed for use on... small carriers. See what I mean ? ;) )

I red that in Vietnam air protection of smaller carrier was assumed by Skyhawks with AIM-9 ???

I thought, too that the V-1000 was a proposal from the late 50's. Hmmm there's a cool alternate world to imagine, in which Vought sell the Crusader III to USAF, the
IF-8 and V-1000 are produced until 1972 for USN and Foreign customers (including navies of countries such as Brazil, France, GB...).
 
Last edited:

Hammer Birchgrove

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Joined
May 13, 2009
Messages
586
Reaction score
2
Fascinating concept. I know that XF-108 Rapier interceptor and the XB-70 Valkyrie bomber were going to have escape capsules. I've read somewhere that one of the V-bombers (the Victor IIRC) were supposed to have an escape capsule to the whole crew; rather than just having ejection seats only for the pilots, forcing the rest of the crew to parachute; with the risks involved.
 

frank

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Joined
May 20, 2006
Messages
617
Reaction score
6
The F-111 had a capsule & IIRC, the original B-1 was to use a capsule.


Hammer Birchgrove said:
Fascinating concept. I know that XF-108 Rapier interceptor and the XB-70 Valkyrie bomber were going to have escape capsules. I've read somewhere that one of the V-bombers (the Victor IIRC) were supposed to have an escape capsule to the whole crew; rather than just having ejection seats only for the pilots, forcing the rest of the crew to parachute; with the risks involved.
 

sferrin

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
12,444
Reaction score
526
The B-58 also used capsules.

http://www.ejectionsite.com/b58capsule.htm
 

fightingirish

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2006
Messages
2,172
Reaction score
188
Dear folks,
other interesting escape concepts are shown in the following topic.
Link: http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,1893.0/all.html
You also see the mockup of Escape Capsuel Concept for the F-8 Crusader.
http://www.chinalakealumni.org/IMAGES/1961/Oscar%20F8U%20ddOCT61%20CLK%20NAN.jpg
Mock up of Chance Vought Optimum Survival and Containment System (OSCAR) escape capsule. The solid fuel rocket motors were designed by China Lake.
2 pictures of the TF-8A (F8U-1T) at SDASM Archives.
Link: http://www.flickr.com/search/?ss=2&w=49487266%40N07&q=F8U-1T&m=text
 

Mark Nankivil

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2007
Messages
1,555
Reaction score
211
I look at the F-8 capsule with the fins and can only think the pilot can steer it to the point of impact. Ouch.

The prototype B-1s had capsules but the B-1B is ejection seat equipped. The XB-70 also had individual capsules - part of the reason that Major Cross was killed after the F-104 collision as the ejection seat could not retract back into the capsule to allow the start of the ejection sequence do to G forces that had built up.

Mark
 

Apollo Leader

CLEARANCE: Restricted
Joined
May 22, 2007
Messages
31
Reaction score
1
One has got to wonder if you eject that much of the aircraft off in an emergency (especially in combat) what if it were itself heavily damaged by enemy fire before ejecting? Wouldn't also the forward section now be an easy target for AAA, SAM's, and enemy fighters? It just screams, "Shoot me".
 

Triton

Donald McKelvy
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
9,723
Reaction score
236
Website
deeptowild.blogspot.com
LTV "Crusader Versatility" two-seat trainer concept artwork lithograph found on eBay.

URL:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/CRUSADER-VERSATILITY-TWO-PLACE-OPERATIONAL-TRAINER-CHANCE-VOUGHT-CORP-LITHOGRAPH-/251084983196?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item3a75d4cb9c
 

Attachments

Triton

Donald McKelvy
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
9,723
Reaction score
236
Website
deeptowild.blogspot.com
What did you do to the image, Scott? Which tool did you use in Adobe Photoshop?

Thanks so much for manipulating the image.
 

Orionblamblam

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2006
Messages
7,458
Reaction score
346
Website
www.aerospaceprojectsreview.com
Triton said:
Which tool did you use in Adobe Photoshop?
Photoshop? Pfff. That's for rich 1% capitalist dogs who can afford thousand-dollar programs. I used Paint Shop Pro, which costs like $90. It has a "perspective correction," which starts off as a simple rectangle overlaid over the image. Simply pull the corners of the rectangle to the corners of the skewed rectangle on the image, hit the button and SHAZAM, it pulls it out into a right rectangle. The aspect ratio might be wrong, though.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IOydrWAIAco
 

Stargazer2006

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2009
Messages
13,242
Reaction score
112
Ha ha. I use exactly the same software to do the very same thing. Though I must admit I don't go as technical as this about it.
 

overscan

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Messages
11,664
Reaction score
1,309
Do not bid on this item please, a forum member is bidding already.
 

Triton

Donald McKelvy
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
9,723
Reaction score
236
Website
deeptowild.blogspot.com
NASA Supercritical wing-modified TF-8A model found on eBay.

Source:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/NASA-MODEL-SUPERCRITICAL-WING-SUPER-CRITICAL-810-TF-8A-F-8-RICHARD-T-WHITCOMB-/251161679829?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item3a7a6717d5
 

Attachments

Steve Pace

Aviation History Writer
Joined
Jan 6, 2013
Messages
2,269
Reaction score
12
FYI: It was an F-8A and not the one of TF-8A. -SP
 

The Artist

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2009
Messages
553
Reaction score
73
RyanCrierie said:
Escape Capsuel Concept.
I stumbled across this while doing an image search on "B-58 ejection capsule brochure" The site listed was "combatreform.org" but I had trouble looking at the site.
 

Attachments

hesham

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
24,685
Reaction score
1,434
I never saw like this before,F-8 Canard and addition features;

http://archive.aviationweek.com/image/spread/19710405/33/2
 

Attachments

Arjen

It's turtles all the way down
Senior Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2010
Messages
2,417
Reaction score
137
In flight:
 

blackkite

Don't laugh, don't cry, don't even curse, but.....
Joined
May 31, 2007
Messages
6,314
Reaction score
859
Dr.Whitcomb's great work.
Modified fuselage shape is impressive. Is it applied area rule?
When I was a child, I imagine almost sama shape. Leading edge was more pointed like B-2 fuselage.
Perhaps you think "he is a liar", but honestly speaking, it's true.:D 
 

Attachments

Last edited:

Archibald

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2006
Messages
2,740
Reaction score
308
The FBW Crusader got his own entry in NASA history series - Computers take flight.

Reading that document is fascinating because it sets the record clear on where did the CF-105 Arrow (1958) exactly stood in the history of FBW.
Basically it was analog FBW 11 years before Concorde (1969) 16 years before F-16 (1974) and 20 years to the day before the Mirage 2000. Quite a notable feat of engineering.

The real deal however was digital FBW. and there the story is equally interesting. Basically NASA Dryden wanted to build yet another analog FBW, but the Air Force was doing the same with a Phantom. The Dryden team went to NASA HQ, and guess who was Associate Administrator for Aeronautics ? Neil Armstrong himself. When they told him they wanted to build an analog FBW, he told them digital would be far better. And he added he had already flown a digital FBW vehicle: the Lunar Module. He proposed the Dryden team to procure one of the LM computers, and they bolted that on a Crusader.
Which mean that Neil Armstrong (and Apollo) made the ultimate "NASA spinoff" to aeronautics: digital FBW, found from the F/A-18 to the Shuttle, A320, Rafale, NH-90 chopper, B-2, and so many others.
 

elmayerle

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2006
Messages
1,277
Reaction score
29
My first thought is that the intake is going to have some severe distortion due to the sharpness of the bends to get to the forward face of the engine.
 
Top