You've not seen the contemporary drawing which shows the Focke-Wulf Volksflugzeug next to the Einheits-T-L-Jaeger? I'm sure I posted a version of it somewhere hereabouts which shows that the Peterle was also included. If not, yes, Focke-Wulf offered three designs for Volksjaeger - the conventional layout Volksflugzeug either with swept wings or straight and a BMW 003, the Flitzer with BMW 003 (upgradable to the 011 in the future without major fuselage changes, which was the Einheits-T-L-Jaeger), and the PTL-powered Peterle. It was all in vain though, because the Heinkel P 1073 had been chosen as the winner even before the competition got started, much to the annoyance of Richard Vogt, since all reasonably impartial observers thought that his Blohm & Voss P 211 design was better.sgeorges4 said:that was the bmw 003 variant?
the FW P.0310239-01,P.0310239-02 & P.0310239-10,is that right ?.
Читать онлайн - Козырев Михаил Егорович. Реактивная авиация Второй мировой войны | Электронная библиотека e-libra.ruЧитать онлайн - Козырев Михаил Егорович. Реактивная авиация Второй мировой войны | Электронная библиотека e-libra.ru Читать онлайн Реактивная авиация Второй мировой войны. Козырев Михаил Егорович.Михаил Егорович Козырев, Вячеслав Михайлович КозыревРеактивная авиация Второй мировой войны Введение...e-libra.ru
There is no evidence of any further designs. All the notes and calculations, over a period of several months, refer to just the tailless and conventional layouts. It's not impossible that there were other drawings in the sequence but my feeling is that the numbers are done that way to avoid appearing to give one design prominence over the other - if one had been '-01' and the other '-02' you might think that less importance had been attached to '-02' during the study. The issue of conventional v tailless layout was very contentious at the time.Thank you my dear Dan,
and I speak generally,do you think there was a series between 0310 239-01 and 0310 239-10 ?,I mean from
-02 to -09 !,but still unknown ?.