Interesting, it seems to lack the second pair of Terrier Guidance radars and no storage space for the Regulus II? Apart from the missing SPS-32/33 radars it looks interesting in this WW2 camo scheme!
There was never a change to Polaris in construction terms, the weapon was proposed but never implemented. The space for Regulus was left unused during construction, as the Navy had already ceased buying the missile and were moving to Polaris on their subs, but I've never seen any indication of actual work done to prepare her for the A-1. They were considering various options to be implemented in a refit when President Kennedy made the decision for them.The preliminary table shows that the Long Beach was envisioned (after a decision) to carry Regulus I missiles, though some artist impressions shows Regulus II. Now Long Beach as finished was stated to have foundations for Polaris missiles. My question is was Long Beach as laid down had space allocated for Regulus II launcher and storage which was later changed to Polaris when the Regulus program terminated? And what does this Polaris foundation means structurally?
![]()
![]()
Note that what appears to be Terriers on each side of the bridge structure!
And am I guessing correctly that Long Beach laid down with Regulus II in mind but shortly after construction started this was changed to Polaris?
2x2 RIM-8 Talos SAM,
Are you sure they aren't AN/SPW-2? Because they looks just like AN/SPW-2 missile guidance radars.4x SPG-51 - Tartar Illumination/tracking Radars
As far as I know - yes. The Terrier Mk-9 GMLS, installed on "Providence"-class cruisers, were similar to Talos; the missiles were held on the individual trays:On the reconstructed cruisers both the Talos and Terrier missile stowage had deck loading doors for reloading, one for each arm. Now on Long Beach the drawings show only a single door for the Talos but none for the Terriers and later Standards. How was the Long Beach forward missile stowage reloaded? Via the loading hatches behind the launchers?
My bad, I misunderstood about what radars are you writing.No they are SPG-51's, forward of the bridge superstructure, the SPW-2's are the small ones above and below the SPG-49's aft.
Cruiser of Tommorow
"SALU" nuclear powered guided missile cruiser concept art.
ALL HANDS MAGAZINE
1956 JUNE Page 35
http://www.navy.mil/ah_online/department_arch1956.html
Concept for a nuclear-powered guided missile cruiser, designed to be equally effective against sea, air, land or underwater (SALU) targets. Funding was included in the Navy’s FY 1957 new construction program. Source: 58thedition of Jane’s Fighting Ships / US Navy All Hands magazine, June 1956, p. 35.
Is that a vertical loading system for the Regulus?
Looks a lot more pretty than the way the real ship turned out.Here it isView attachment 644995
What makes a 'cruiser' hull rather than a 'destroyer' hull isn't the sheerline, but the structural arrangement. Cruiser hulls were much more heavily built, generally with four-shaft rather than two-shaft powerplants; a cruiser also had significantly greater self-maintenance capability, larger stores, and improved crew amenities.As for the hull, Long Beach has a sleek long cruiser hull where the hull starts to arch towards the nose from the middle of the hull while the Virginia and other destroyer types starts this arch much closer to the nose say from the 3/4th or 3/5th of the hull