sferrin said:weavty1 said:I found out a few minutes ago, but can't say a word.. Have to wait and talk about it after 5:15, like everyone else. Bleh
That qualifies as "cruel and unusual punishment".![]()
![]()
Seriously, he has TWO posts and you believe that?
sferrin said:weavty1 said:I found out a few minutes ago, but can't say a word.. Have to wait and talk about it after 5:15, like everyone else. Bleh
That qualifies as "cruel and unusual punishment".![]()
![]()
quellish said:totoro said:That could almost be a polite way of saying: "come on, bloomberg, cnn, msnbc, whoever - give me a ring and present a "donation" offer"
The donation I meant was to keep this site running. When I see paid sites very obviously sourcing material from here, but not contributing to the operation of the site, I find that distasteful.
And I thought you guys would be more interested in the wings.
quellish said:totoro said:That could almost be a polite way of saying: "come on, bloomberg, cnn, msnbc, whoever - give me a ring and present a "donation" offer"
The donation I meant was to keep this site running. When I see paid sites very obviously sourcing material from here, but not contributing to the operation of the site, I find that distasteful.
And I thought you guys would be more interested in the wings.
What does that have to do with anything? I've been a registered member here now for over two years. Just because one doesn't post, doesn't mean they aren't privy to information.sublight is back said:sferrin said:weavty1 said:I found out a few minutes ago, but can't say a word.. Have to wait and talk about it after 5:15, like everyone else. Bleh
That qualifies as "cruel and unusual punishment".![]()
![]()
Seriously, he has TWO posts and you believe that?
AIR FORCE
Northrop Grumman, Falls Church, Virginia, has been awarded a contract for the Long Range Strike Bomber. For more information, please refer to: http://www.defense.gov/News/Press-Advisories/Press-Advisory-View/Article/626036/air-force-to-announce-long-range-strike-bomber-contract-award
flateric said:Back in 2012, Boeing in cooperation with Stratasys and using their FDM (fused deposition modeling) machines have produced some interesting test articles...
Well. I'm pretty sure that this is NOT MQ-25 inlet. May be SesnorCraft. May be generic test specimen. But for something BIG.Sundog said:Are you sure that inlet is for a bomber and not something like the MQ-25?
Dragon029 said:It looks a bit bigger than 3ft in diameter; remember that what we're seeing is just half of the intakec(at least where it attaches to the engine); it looks like it'd fit a fan Inlet diameter closer to 4 or maybe 5ft (assuming the guy next to it is close to 6ft tall).
flateric said:Back in 2012, Boeing in cooperation with Stratasys and using their FDM (fused deposition modeling) machines have produced some interesting test articles...
flateric said:this is apparently an inlet
Yes, need to get this goin. Where is the B-1B replacement program?Interestingly, Lockheed Martin's entry to the LRS-B completion appears to have had deep roots in a General Dynamics design:
https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/threads/general-dynamics-proposal-model-what-is-it.22130/
Yes, need to get this goin. Where is the B-1B replacement program?
see STAV/ESAV studies as a basis for a possible future supersonic strike platform if it will ever be fundedYes, need to get this goin. Where is the B-1B replacement program?
Didn't that prove to be the truth, and then some!but lately I've caught more than a few whiffs that there's a pretty wide gulf opening between the Boeing folks in Chicago and the Boeing folks everywhere else.
All so the Boeing CEO could walk to see some opera...Didn't that prove to be the truth, and then some!but lately I've caught more than a few whiffs that there's a pretty wide gulf opening between the Boeing folks in Chicago and the Boeing folks everywhere else.
IIRC, the second image used 737 wings, engines and tail.AW&ST September 27, 1999 pg 57 "B-2 Follow-on Designs Revealed" by David A. Fulghum
Boeing has developed several different concepts to challenge Northrop-Grumman in case a 2015 low-cost bomber program is launched eliminating futuristic tech such as hypersonics:
1) The most unorthodox thinking has gone into developing a commercially derived bomber. One concept is based on Boeing's 767. To meet low-observability, engines are moved into the aft portion of the fuselage with the inlet on top. The vertical tail would be replaced with V-tail. RAM would be applied to the outer fuselage to achieve stealth performance
I wonder if these concepts were starting points for Boeing's "stealthy" 767 concept. Have illustrations of the 2000 concept ever been publicly released? I'm really intrigued as to how exactly a 767 would be made stealthy.
Here's a question, what is the next gen bomber after the B-21 going to look like?