• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

USAF Project 'AERIE' The ultimate stand-off interceptor?

Pioneer

Seek out and close with the enemy
Senior Member
Joined
May 22, 2006
Messages
1,789
Reaction score
170
I found out about this aircraft project a few years ago in a great book called The Pentagon Paradox – The Development of the F-18 Hornet.

One of the Projects that was mentioned in the book in the USAF’s quest to field an effective air defence system was a USAF Project ‘AERIE’ of 1957.
Project ‘AERIE’ was a modified Boeing C-135A acting as a self contained weapons platform, equipped with a powerful air-search radar, its own airborne command centre and armed with no less than Twenty Four AAM-N-10 Eagle Long-range AAM`s.
This aircraft would loiter endlessly patrolling the aerospace of the United States (limited only by its crews endurance and stamina) intercepting any threatening Soviet strategic bomber that approached the continent.

Has anyone else got any other information on this Project, in the way of drawings, specifications etc………..
Or have you heared of similar projects – US or Soviet???

The only thing that I know came close to this was a Lockheed proposal to a US Navy requirement of Land-Based Fleet Air Defence Aircraft. Lockheed’s submission was the CL-520, which was based on modified P-3 Orion. But like Project ‘AERIE’ it had its own AEW like air-search radom, and its own powerful fire-control radar and armed with around 10-12 AAM-N-10 Eagle LRAAM`s (see attached 3-view drawing posted).

Looking forward to your input gents!
 

Attachments

elmayerle

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2006
Messages
1,314
Reaction score
87
Hmm, this does answer something I've wondered about. Given that fighter radars have been fitted to the nose of the P-3 and that the AEW version of the P-3 uses the same radar as the E-2, I've often wondered about combining the F-14's radar in the nose with the AEW radar, handing targets off would be easy since no datlink would be required, and carrying a bunch of AIM-54's. This concept is earlier, but much the same. As an extension, do it from a P-3J amd use it, also, for target handoffs for the Nike-Phoenix proposal that McDD & Hughes pitched to the Japanese (a major rework of their Nike-Hercules missiles with AIM-54 avionics and new, improved, solid fuel rockets).
 

sferrin

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
13,111
Reaction score
1,170
I'd read they kicked around the idea of arming the B-1 with 24 Phoenix missiles for a similar mission at one point. Also do you have any data on the Nike-Phoenix? Or Sea Phoenix for that matter? (It was intended to use the Phoenix in place of Sparrow on CVNs but was too many $$$ in the end).
 

overscan (PaulMM)

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Messages
12,115
Reaction score
2,622
Tupolev had projects for Tu-22M (DP-1) and Tu-144 (DP-2) based interceptors, and a Tu-160 armed with the MiG-31's Zaslon radar and R-33 AAMs.
 

TinWing

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2006
Messages
888
Reaction score
45
sferrin said:
Or Sea Phoenix for that matter? (It was intended to use the Phoenix in place of Sparrow on CVNs but was too many $$$ in the end).
In a surface lauched role the Phoenix's tremendous range would have been degraded - unless a booster stage was added, but that would have put the missile in the same size and weight class as the Standard.
 

GTX

All hail the God of Frustration!!!
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2006
Messages
2,889
Reaction score
338
Website
beyondthesprues.com
Tupolev had projects for Tu-22M (DP-1) and Tu-144 (DP-2) based interceptors, and a Tu-160 armed with the MiG-31's Zaslon radar and R-33 AAMs.
Overscan,

Do you have details of these projects?

Regards,

Greg
 

elmayerle

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2006
Messages
1,314
Reaction score
87
sferrin said:
I'd read they kicked around the idea of arming the B-1 with 24 Phoenix missiles for a similar mission at one point. Also do you have any data on the Nike-Phoenix? Or Sea Phoenix for that matter? (It was intended to use the Phoenix in place of Sparrow on CVNs but was too many $$$ in the end).
The only data I have on Nike-Phoenix is what I gave that was reported in the industry media at the time (the proposal was beaten by a deal for the Japanese to license-build the Patriot missile and launcher).
 

AndrewN

By day, a mild mannered teacher of computing...
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
22
Reaction score
29
There was a similar project considered by the RAF in the 60's, using a Vulcan B2 as the airframe. The aircraft had a search Radar installed and would carry upto 10 modified Seadart missiles. The details are in "Vulcan's Hammer" by Chris Gibson, I don't want to post a copy of the drawing from Chris' book as Chris is active here and could post it himself.
 

PMN1

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2006
Messages
719
Reaction score
55
AndrewN said:
There was a similar project considered by the RAF in the 60's, using a Vulcan B2 as the airframe. The aircraft had a search Radar installed and would carry upto 10 modified Seadart missiles. The details are in "Vulcan's Hammer" by Chris Gibson, I don't want to post a copy of the drawing from Chris' book as Chris is active here and could post it himself.
There was also a proposal for a VC10 version.
 

major-1

2 Form
Joined
Jan 4, 2017
Messages
14
Reaction score
9
The S-25 Berkut (SA-1) system (the 1952 project) included interceptors based on the Tu-4. Each aircraft was to carry 4 missiles. SARH missiles, 1000kg weight, range of 15km. In the air should be 10 aircraft. On the ground there are 20 aircraft.

This part of the defense system was rejected.
 

major-1

2 Form
Joined
Jan 4, 2017
Messages
14
Reaction score
9
Information in russian.
https://topwar.ru/34821-sverhtyazhelyy-perehvatchik-pvo-tu-4-d-500-kompleks-g-310.html
http://militaryrussia.ru/blog/topic-303.html
 

Michel Van

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2007
Messages
4,508
Reaction score
489
There another program that fit description of AERIE

1950s Lockheed CL-292-6 proposal
Powered with four Nuclear Turboprop engines (90 megawatt reactor)
A armed flying Detection and Early Warning Aircraft
four Mark I missiles
fourteen Mark II missiles
It carry four parasite F-104 (CL-307-1) under it's wings.
Each Parasite fighter has around 12 Sidewinder Missile in his nose section

Scott Lowther was speculating about the role of the Lockheed CL-292-6.
special about large amount of Missile the plane carry
Since his information was not specific about what missile it carry.

now under AERIE this begin to make sense as stand-off interceptor
DEW the Enemies bomber and fire there 28 Long-range AAM and start four F-104
i guess that four Mark I missiles have nuclear warheads for bomber fleet

Source:
The Lockheed CL-292-6
US Bomber Project: Preview

The Lockheed CL-307-1
 
Last edited by a moderator:

CJGibson

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2011
Messages
1,365
Reaction score
511
I could argue that the Tornado F.3 was the ultimate example of this role.

Chris
 

Grey Havoc

The path not taken.
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
11,395
Reaction score
1,614
While the FAS.org entry on the Imperial Iranian Navy is something of a mess, it does mention that in September of 1972, during a briefing of the Shah of Iran and members of the Supreme Commander's Staff (said SC being the Shah) by USN and USAF representatives on the F-14 and F-15, the Shah made detailed enquires about the possibility of operating the AWG-9 Radar and Phoenix missile combo from Imperial Iranian Navy P-3s and helicopters (new build IIN CH-53Ds?), including against waterborne surface targets.

I should note here that the IIN hadn't received it's planned P-3s before the revolution, the six P-3Fs that were delivered to Iran having being delivered to the IIAF for some reason.
 
Last edited:

TomS

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2008
Messages
3,893
Reaction score
827
I should note here that the IIN hadn't received it's planned P-3s before the revolution, the six P-3Fs that were delivered to Iran having being delivered to the IIAF for some reason.
Might just have been internal politics. But the P-3Fs didn't have ASW gear, so that might explain why they were not have assets.
 
Top