?Anybody found the 150mm triple turret armed varuant of this carrier proposal?
???www.facebook.com
Here the ship drawing shows a 2x3 210mm armed Battlecarrier or Carrier with Guns:
I always assumed that 210-mm was either a mistake, or merely a proposal "we could put heavier guns in there, if needed". As far as I know, Sweden did not have 8-inch gun in production by late 1940s. And the turret itself looks like triple 152-mm/53 turret (the bow triple on Tre Kronor-class)Here the ship drawing shows a 2x3 210mm armed Battlecarrier or Carrier with Guns:
https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/threads/swedish-hangarkryssare-of-1946.24613/#post-614809 While the turret drawing shows the same turret but with 15cm guns.
Actually two, an 1941 and a 1945 design both with 1 triple 21cm (presumably 209mm) turretWell, the barrel gap telling me those aren't 15cm, but a 21cm turret and in fact there is another Swedish monitor/coastal ship project with triple 21cm turret somewhere (unless i mistake one with triple 35cm turret).
The part from Friedman's book about the 16-barrel Bofors mounting:If you ever come to see or read about a very large Bofors mount of 16 barrels, that would be awesome!
In Friedman's "British Cruisers: Two World Wars and After" he mentions that DNO proposed in 1947 a quadruple 3in gun, and previously a sixteen-barrel (sexdecuple) Bofors for high rates of fire against modern aircraft and missiles.
No because the Lexingtons carried 8" guns in 4 twin turrets on both ends of the superstructure before their modernization and they had no issues.I wonder if there were quantified considerations on the effect of firing those guns on surrounding flight deck? Like wouldn't it distort the whole thing?
Blast issue on deck starts to get serious like above 10" or 24/25cm calibre.