flateric

ACCESS: USAP
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
1 April 2006
Messages
10,702
Reaction score
6,567
"Rockwell's Manned strategic system concepts 1990-2000" study
Dan Raymer's fantasy was outstanding...hands off
 

Attachments

  • RI Raymer 1979 bombers simplistic.jpg
    RI Raymer 1979 bombers simplistic.jpg
    67.5 KB · Views: 1,777
  • RI Raymer 1979 bombers minimumweight.jpg
    RI Raymer 1979 bombers minimumweight.jpg
    70.3 KB · Views: 1,608
  • RI Raymer 1979 bombers supersonicpenetration.jpg
    RI Raymer 1979 bombers supersonicpenetration.jpg
    59.9 KB · Views: 1,586
  • RI Raymer 1979 bombers defensivelaser.jpg
    RI Raymer 1979 bombers defensivelaser.jpg
    61.9 KB · Views: 1,558
Flateric

Those concepts were real studies for aircrafts or just fantasy airships for sci-fi movies?

there some impressive...

raravia
 
I think that Rockwell International paid Daniel Raymer not for sci-fi movie scetches. You probably know that he was Rockwell's ATF entry chief designer.

Source:

Manned strategic system concepts 1990-2000
WILER, C. D. (Rockwell International Corp., North American Aircraft Group, Los Angeles, Calif.) RAYMER, D. P. (Rockwell International Corp., North American Aircraft Group, Los Angeles, Calif.)
AIAA-1979-1793
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Aircraft Systems and Technology Meeting, New York, N.Y., Aug. 20-22, 1979, 15 p.F33615-77-C-0115
 
This is Rockwell's genious Dan Raymer design of so-called 'Low-Cost Simplistic Aircraft' bomber aka ISADS, one of more carefully studied during 1979 'Manned strategic system concepts 1990-2000' study.

Look here as well for other concepts studied.
http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=362.msg2241#msg2241
If you want, I will add more pictoriial info to Rockwell studies thread.

Dan is very interesting person - his wife has russian roots and he even has course of his lectures in Moscow Aviation Institute in post-Perestroika period.
 

Attachments

  • Clipboard02.jpg
    Clipboard02.jpg
    100.3 KB · Views: 597
  • Clipboard05.jpg
    Clipboard05.jpg
    39.2 KB · Views: 547
  • Clipboard01.jpg
    Clipboard01.jpg
    47.6 KB · Views: 667
  • spanloader-s.jpg
    spanloader-s.jpg
    40.1 KB · Views: 1,139
Delta spanloader
 

Attachments

  • dltspan3.jpg
    dltspan3.jpg
    38.2 KB · Views: 599
  • dltspan.jpg
    dltspan.jpg
    9.6 KB · Views: 749
  • Clipboard04.jpg
    Clipboard04.jpg
    53 KB · Views: 566
  • Clipboard03.jpg
    Clipboard03.jpg
    99.9 KB · Views: 487
More on delta spanloader concept, including nuclear-powered
 

Attachments

  • 02a01a2006113617PM.jpg
    02a01a2006113617PM.jpg
    130.6 KB · Views: 575
  • Clipboard10.jpg
    Clipboard10.jpg
    22.4 KB · Views: 455
  • Clipboard11.jpg
    Clipboard11.jpg
    58.7 KB · Views: 451
Minimum-weight baseline vehicle
 

Attachments

  • Clipboard09.jpg
    Clipboard09.jpg
    37.9 KB · Views: 399
  • Clipboard07.jpg
    Clipboard07.jpg
    200.5 KB · Views: 475
Minimum penetration-time vehicle
 

Attachments

  • Clipboard12.jpg
    Clipboard12.jpg
    33.9 KB · Views: 518
  • Clipboard13.jpg
    Clipboard13.jpg
    151.2 KB · Views: 473
And Defensive laser baseline vehicle...
 

Attachments

  • Clipboard14.jpg
    Clipboard14.jpg
    169.6 KB · Views: 517
A nice b/w rendering of the Minimum Weight Baseline Vehicle taking off... ;D
 

Attachments

  • Rockwell_bomber.jpg
    Rockwell_bomber.jpg
    12.3 KB · Views: 605
Crossposted from Boeing Advanced Bomber studies
 

Attachments

  • Bombers_of_the_70s.jpg
    Bombers_of_the_70s.jpg
    31.7 KB · Views: 1,022
From the late '70's. Subsonic, minimal stealth, geometrically simple with constant sections. Also included is a hydrogen fueled version. Source grade "5."
 

Attachments

  • small rockwell lowcost.gif
    small rockwell lowcost.gif
    61.5 KB · Views: 691
Other info on 1979 Rockwell's study for 1999-2000 Manned Strategic Systems Concepts is here http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,362.0.html
This is, of course, doesn't match Scott's brilliant final drawings, but makes insight on other aspects of the study.

Scott - is this a spare set or a part of upcoming eAPR article?
 
BTW, Dan Raymer is somewhere here AFAIK...
 
This is what Flateric posted about the design in question:

http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,362.msg4634.html#msg4634



The engines look like medium bypass types, with nacelles similar in general appearance, if not size, to the JT8D - but obviously well over twice the output?

I would think that the only way to build a "low cost" bomber would be to employ an existing turbofan?
 
'Tom, didn't you see these Flankers at 2? - Hmm, all I see is our bloody big H2 tank...Ouch...Eject! Eject!'
 
Uh, I was hoping you were working at a recapitulation of spanloader concepts... like the BWBs in eAPR n.3. I'm doing it for myself as far as the 1970's NASA sponsored projects... I'll post something in the near future.
 
DAMN!!!!!!

It seems like the best way to make progress is to simply give up. After years of putting together scraps on things like the delta spanloader, and forging up a reconstruction, *today* I get in the mail a Rockwell document via FOIA that lays out the drawings in nice, neat, clear, unambiguous lines. The delta as well as the other designs that Flateric ppsted back in August '06.

And boy was I wrong about the Minimum Penetration Time design side view.

Back to the freakin' drawing board... :mad:
 
Some layout drawings. Don't worry... "US Bomber Projects" will have full-rez versions...
 

Attachments

  • smallD645-3.gif
    smallD645-3.gif
    42 KB · Views: 822
  • smallD645-4A.gif
    smallD645-4A.gif
    49.1 KB · Views: 679
  • smallD645-5.gif
    smallD645-5.gif
    44.3 KB · Views: 632
  • smallD645-6.gif
    smallD645-6.gif
    64 KB · Views: 642
Wow, those are awesome drawings. Where did you locate them, or is that "Proprietary?" You may also have to sell high res versions on CD :) . I had no idea a drawing of the scissor wing bomber that detailed existed. Now if we could only find one for the scissor wing design that is, similar to that Rockwell design, by Boeing.
 
Sundog said:
Wow, those are awesome drawings. Where did you locate them, or is that "Proprietary?"

Those are the end results of several years worth of Freedom of Information Act requests.

You may also have to sell high res versions on CD :) .

I have a *lot* of high-rez bomber stuff that I think would sell on CD. B ut I want to get the book out before I go and dump all the research for it...

Now if we could only find one for the scissor wing design that is, similar to that Rockwell design, by Boeing.

While I know that roughly equivalent work was put into the Boeing concept, I don't think I've seen references to the actual reports.
 
So, not to get too far off topic, how is the bomber book coming along? Will we see it this year?
 
Sundog said:
So, not to get too far off topic, how is the bomber book coming along? Will we see it this year?

Depends on how broad-minded you are on how you define a "year."


JupiterGreatRedSpotCassini.jpg
 
Full Rockwell study report...

http://stinet.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=C016293&Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf
 
Great find, Overscan!
 
Mmmmm, it seems that when you ask a non-free printed report in NIST or DTIC or CASI-NASA they exploit the search you pay fr to scan it and make it available for free online.... this has already happened to me. Curious policy.
 
I guess in my turn that these recent declassified reports online somehow related to Orionblamblam's requests...and efforts
 
http://hdl.handle.net/2060/19860067851

OVER WING INLETS FOR SUPERSONIC PENETRATOR VEHICLES
by Louis C. Young
Rockwell International
 

Attachments

  • rock_1977_inlets_penetrator_1.jpg
    rock_1977_inlets_penetrator_1.jpg
    79.4 KB · Views: 518
  • rock_1977_inlets_penetrator_2.jpg
    rock_1977_inlets_penetrator_2.jpg
    44.9 KB · Views: 454
  • rock_1977_inlets_penetrator_3.jpg
    rock_1977_inlets_penetrator_3.jpg
    58.9 KB · Views: 563
where find this?

Manned strategic system concepts 1990-2000
many thanks?
 
AIAA site, for a modicous amount of money.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom