Raketen_2D_2012-Model_PPANC_PSG.jpg

So, L-R:
RZ 65 - HE, air-to-air and air-to-ground, tested approx. 1938-1943;
PZ 65 B - APHE variant of the RZ 65, tested in 1943;
8,8 cm R PzB Gr 4322 (Panzerschreck) - HEAT, tested in late 1944, used in 1945; 8,8 cm R PzB Gr 4992 was most probably never made in series.
8 cm R Sprgr - HE, used in limited numbers; originally a ground-to-ground rocket;
Panzerblitz 1 - HEAT, 8 cm R Sprgr engine, 88 mm Panzerschreck warhead, tested in late 1944, used from at least January 1, 1945;
R 4/M - HE, air-to-air, used in 1945;
Panzerblitz 2 - HEAT, R 4/M engine, 88 mm Panzrerschreck warhead, tested in late 1944, maybe used in 1945;
Panzerblitz 2 with faired warhead
Panzerblitz 3 - HEAT, R 4/M engine, 55 mm warhead, in development, at least static tests of the warhead.

Drawings of the "RPzB Gr 4312" (actually 8,8 cm R Pz Gr 4312), "RPz B Gr 4992" (actually 8,8 cm R PzB Gr 4992), "DWM Fliegerschreck", "Panzerblitz Pb 1 (early type)" and "Fliegender Panzerschreck I", then "Panzerblitz 2" from Hahn's book, as well as "RS-82" and "RBS-82", presented earlier are very inaccurate or fictional/speculative.
 
Last edited:
View attachment 656209

So, L-R:
RZ 65 - HE, air-to-air and air-to-ground, tested approx. 1938-1943;
PZ 65 B - APHE variant of the RZ 65, tested in 1943;
8,8 cm R PzB Gr 4322 (Panzerschreck) - HEAT, tested in late 1944, used in 1945; 8,8 cm R PzB Gr 4992 was most probably never made in series.
8 cm R Sprgr - HE, used in limited numbers; originally a ground-to-ground rocket;
Panzerblitz 1 - HEAT, 8 cm R Sprgr engine, 88 mm Panzerschreck warhead, tested in late 1944, used from at least January 1, 1945;
R 4/M - HE, air-to-air, used in 1945;
Panzerblitz 2 - HEAT, R 4/M engine, 88 mm Panzrerschreck warhead, tested in late 1944, maybe used in 1945;
Panzerblitz 2 with faired warhead
Panzerblitz 3 - HEAT, R 4/M engine, 55 mm warhead, in development, at least static tests of the warhead.

Drawings of the "RPzB Gr 4312" (actually 8,8 cm R Pz Gr 4312), "RPz B Gr 4992" (actually 8,8 cm R PzB Gr 4992), "DWM Fliegerschreck", "Panzerblitz Pb 1 (early type)" and "Fliegender Panzerschreck I", then "Panzerblitz 2" from Hahn's book, as well as "RS-82" and "RBS-82", presented earlier are very inaccurate or fictional/speculative.
Thank you very much, but my question now is how it is with the panzerschrecks. Which of the many configurations where used? With what rocket? What are the differences between them? And which ones are speculative?

Sorry for asking so many questions, i am just a bit overwhelmed by the amount of information and speculation because they came so late in the war.
 
The only Panzerschreck rocket used for sure was the 8,8 cm R PzB Gr 4322, while the 8,8 cm R PzB Gr 4992 most probably never went into series production due to technical problems and general collapse of everything in 1945. By the way - as opposed to Justo's speculative drawings presented above, 4322 and 4992 rockets was identical as far as shapes, dimensions, construction and performance are concerned, the only difference was presence of a contact ring on the drum stabilizer of the 4992.
The only Panzerschreck aircraft launcher used in combat for sure and documented with photos is a triple one with semi-opened tubes, shown in posts #15 and #35. Tubes of this launcher were approx. 160 cm long (also the same length as the shoulder fired 8,8 cm R PzB 54 launcher), so Justo got them WAY too short in his drawing in post #3, while drawings in post #4 are completely speculative.
It's sometimes written in books, also the Panzerschreck 2 aka PD 8,8 (whatever it was actually) could have been used in combat in limited numbers in 1945, but I've never encountered any evidence supporting these claims. All photos I've ever seen show the triple launchers.
Documentation of the era is shown in posts #33 (wooden mock-up only!) and #39. Just have in mind, it's sometimes suspected, the thing shown in #33 is not an AT rocket launcher, but a a multi barrel gun of 2 or 3 cm calibre.

So, as far as other drawings presented in earlier posts here are concerned:
#10 - actual Panzerblitz 3 warhead
#11 - actual Panzerblitz 2 warhead
#12 - fiction
#14 - very inaccurate scheme, simply fictional
#20 - first three rockets actual, 4th fictional, 5th speculative
#27 - all real, just RZ 73 shouldn't have a protruding nose mounted fuse.
 
The only Panzerschreck rocket used for sure was the 8,8 cm R PzB Gr 4322, while the 8,8 cm R PzB Gr 4992 most probably never went into series production due to technical problems and general collapse of everything in 1945. By the way - as opposed to Justo's speculative drawings presented above, 4322 and 4992 rockets was identical as far as shapes, dimensions, construction and performance are concerned, the only difference was presence of a contact ring on the drum stabilizer of the 4992.
The only Panzerschreck aircraft launcher used in combat for sure and documented with photos is a triple one with semi-opened tubes, shown in posts #15 and #35. Tubes of this launcher were approx. 160 cm long (also the same length as the shoulder fired 8,8 cm R PzB 54 launcher), so Justo got them WAY too short in his drawing in post #3, while drawings in post #4 are completely speculative.
It's sometimes written in books, also the Panzerschreck 2 aka PD 8,8 (whatever it was actually) could have been used in combat in limited numbers in 1945, but I've never encountered any evidence supporting these claims. All photos I've ever seen show the triple launchers.
Documentation of the era is shown in posts #33 (wooden mock-up only!) and #39. Just have in mind, it's sometimes suspected, the thing shown in #33 is not an AT rocket launcher, but a a multi barrel gun of 2 or 3 cm calibre.

So, as far as other drawings presented in earlier posts here are concerned:
#10 - actual Panzerblitz 3 warhead
#11 - actual Panzerblitz 2 warhead
#12 - fiction
#14 - very inaccurate scheme, simply fictional
#20 - first three rockets actual, 4th fictional, 5th speculative
#27 - all real, just RZ 73 shouldn't have a protruding nose mounted fuse.
thank you very much! you are making it very clear for me.

as a last thing, i see that there might be a slight variation with the panzerblitz 2 with aerodynamic cap. as the section that transitions from the rocket body to the aerodynamic cap is sometimes thinner it seems.

thicker section:

1619803467678.png
1619803546278.png

thinner section:
1619803601589.png
 

Attachments

  • 1619803478988.png
    1619803478988.png
    143.2 KB · Views: 124
and one very very last thing, even though it might not interest you. this could help me quite a bit fixing historical errors in the game War Thunder.
so we have the panzerblitz 2 in War Thunder (only with the aerodynamic cap) but not the one without in the game.

the one with the aerodynamic cap has the thinner mid section, yet the one without doesn't.

i know you have nothing to do with this game, and you aren't a developer of it. but pointing out the mistakes made here could benefit me and this game.

1619804063818.png
1619804079438.png

2 things i noticed quickly:
1 how does that midsection fit if it is exactly the same warhead?
2 why is the metal tip on the panzerblitz 2 without the aerodynamic cap smaller?

this could be the fault of the modellers but just want to know.
if you can help me with this that would be grand.
 
1 how does that midsection fit if it is exactly the same warhead?
I think, the drawing below can explain variations in the Panzerblitz 2 warhead shape:

Pb2_Warhead_800ps.png

The rocket was equipped with a complete Panzerschreck warhead (88 mm diameter), mounted directly at the forward end of the R 4 engine (55 mm diameter). In the complete variant (rightmost example in the drawing), the warhead had a ballistic cap in front plus a tubular sleeve at the rear, fairing its connection with the engine. I think this is the proper appearance of the standard Panzerbliz 2 rocket.
But, by removing the ballistic cap and/or the sleeve in various combinations, the rocket could look, as shown by the three examples in the middle.
2 why is the metal tip on the panzerblitz 2 without the aerodynamic cap smaller?
No idea. :) Panzerschreck warhead (in the 8,8 cm R PzB Gr 4322, Panzerblitz 1 and Panzerblitz 2) was equipped with the AZ 5095/1 impact fuse, which is nicely visible in the 2nd picture in post #44, no matter if the ballistic cap was present or not
The 3rd picture of post #44 is of very poor quality (I wonder, if it's not my scan made 20 years ago and circulating on the internet since then), but if you look closely at the rocket in the middle, you'll notice, it has a typical Panzerschreck warhead with the ballistic cap, but without the sleeve - it is not an elliptical warhead as in the upper drawing in post #45. The only problem is, the fuse looks differently than the AZ 5095/1, resembling maybe the AZR 2 fuse of the R 4/M or Panzerblitz 3 - sadly, quality of the picture is too low to draw definite conclusions. But - I think, the picture comes from a postwar Allied report, probably taken at a research or production facility and thus may show e.g. incomplete, non-standard or test/practice rockets with inert warheads (in the latter case, the warhead can be equipped with any fuse mock-up available at hand, not neccessarily the proper AZ 5095/1). The rocket at the bottom has no fuse at all.
 
Last edited:
thank you with being so helpful on this unkown/unique subject and spending your time here being informative, i understand this complicated subject now.

well i also have a photo here i found from the il-2 sturmovik forums that might help people understand the differences between the missiles more.

1619969208898.png
 
If it is helpful and useful, here is some information about Panzerschreck granaten.
 

Attachments

  • 019.jpg
    019.jpg
    122.2 KB · Views: 144
  • 020.jpg
    020.jpg
    119.9 KB · Views: 139
  • 021.jpg
    021.jpg
    100.5 KB · Views: 141
  • 022.jpg
    022.jpg
    138.8 KB · Views: 134
  • 023.jpg
    023.jpg
    155.9 KB · Views: 131
  • 024.jpg
    024.jpg
    125 KB · Views: 132
  • 025.jpg
    025.jpg
    143.7 KB · Views: 140
  • 026.jpg
    026.jpg
    147.1 KB · Views: 223
i wanted to ask what the difference is between the panzerblitz 1 (early) and the panzerblitz 1 (late)
so far i know there is a difference between the warhead but i don't know what actually changed.

also i have found a nice photo of (maybe) a fliegende panzerschreck configuration. so it might exist after all.
 

Attachments

  • XEQPCxV.jpg
    XEQPCxV.jpg
    46.8 KB · Views: 222
i wanted to ask what the difference is between the panzerblitz 1 (early) and the panzerblitz 1 (late)
so far i know there is a difference between the warhead but i don't know what actually changed.

also i have found a nice photo of (maybe) a fliegende panzerschreck configuration. so it might exist after all.
 

Attachments

  • Escanear0002.jpg
    Escanear0002.jpg
    116.3 KB · Views: 210
  • Escanear0003.jpg
    Escanear0003.jpg
    193.2 KB · Views: 164
  • Escanear0005.jpg
    Escanear0005.jpg
    145.6 KB · Views: 156
  • Escanear0007.jpg
    Escanear0007.jpg
    98.5 KB · Views: 134
  • Escanear0008.jpg
    Escanear0008.jpg
    117.9 KB · Views: 131
  • Escanear0009.jpg
    Escanear0009.jpg
    112.6 KB · Views: 183
i have a question, does anyone here know how heavy the panzerblitz rockets where and their speed in m/s?
for example the R4/M weighs 3.85 KG on wikipedia and has a speed of 525 m/s, but i don't know how heavy the panzerblitz 2 is and how fast it goes.
 
Panzerblitz 2 was 4.6 kg heavy and reached 350 m/s, Panzerblitz 3 - 3.85 kg and 550 m/s (both values the same as R 4/M).
Panzerblitz 1 is a harder case, as there's great diversity of published data, but a rocket 7.1-7.24 kg heavy, burning 1 kg of solid propellant should reach some 260 m/s (370-374 m/s can be encountered in some publications, but these values are impossibly high).
 
Last edited:
Panzerblitz 2 was 4.6 kg heavy and reached 350 m/s, Panzerblitz 3 - 3.85 kg and 550 m/s (both values the same as R 4/M).
Panzerblitz 1 is a harder case, as there's great diversity of published data, but a rocket 7.1-7.24 kg heavy, burning 1 kg of solid propellant should reach some 260 m/s (370-374 m/s can be encountered in some publications, but these values are impossibly high).
thanks
 
Do we have any info on rocket pods for the He 162? Some sources mentions that 30 rockets could be carried in "honey-comb like pods", one under each wing, the installation weighing 250 kg total.
 
From "Unknown" N.5 (post-1)
Does that BV 212 in the third drawing really have the rockets grouped around the air intake for the engine, along with two 30mm just below it? If that is the case, good thing it never got built because firing those would have almost certainly resulted in a flameout of the jet engine every time it did.
Smoke ingestion from firing rockets and guns on many late 40's and into the 50's fighter aircraft resulted in that happening necessitating careful redesign of the intakes and weapon positions to prevent that from occurring.
 
From "Unknown" N.5 (post-1)
Does that BV 212 in the third drawing really have the rockets grouped around the air intake for the engine, along with two 30mm just below it? If that is the case, good thing it never got built because firing those would have almost certainly resulted in a flameout of the jet engine every time it did.
Smoke ingestion from firing rockets and guns on many late 40's and into the 50's fighter aircraft resulted in that happening necessitating careful redesign of the intakes and weapon positions to prevent that from occurring.
Sources
 

Attachments

  • 709.jpg
    709.jpg
    434.9 KB · Views: 174
  • 710.jpg
    710.jpg
    1.3 MB · Views: 177
From "Unknown" N.5 (post-1)
Does that BV 212 in the third drawing really have the rockets grouped around the air intake for the engine, along with two 30mm just below it? If that is the case, good thing it never got built because firing those would have almost certainly resulted in a flameout of the jet engine every time it did.
Smoke ingestion from firing rockets and guns on many late 40's and into the 50's fighter aircraft resulted in that happening necessitating careful redesign of the intakes and weapon positions to prevent that from occurring.
Sources
Yea, that isn't going to work. You end up with massive smoke ingestion and the engine compressor stalls. The Hawker Hunter, is a great example of this from the 50's. The plane for years couldn't fire its guns because the engine flamed out when you did.
 
Abgasleitung
 

Attachments

  • 712.jpg
    712.jpg
    469.7 KB · Views: 127
  • 713.jpg
    713.jpg
    201.4 KB · Views: 96
  • 714.jpg
    714.jpg
    695.5 KB · Views: 95
  • 715.jpg
    715.jpg
    1 MB · Views: 100
  • 716.jpg
    716.jpg
    907.1 KB · Views: 109
  • 717.jpg
    717.jpg
    365.3 KB · Views: 120
From "Unknown" N.3 (post-2)
Hi Grzesio
Excellent drawing!
I have found this drawing on the SG118 where it can be seen that it is a recoilless weapon , unrelated to the "Block 108" system , as mentioned in all the texts I have.
Do you have any additional info on this?
Hello Mr Miranda,
could I use some of your drawings in my book about German aircraft armament in WWII. It will be published by Motorbuch Verlag Stuttgart in the next months.
Sincerely,
Gunter
 
Hello Mr Miranda,
could I use some of your drawings in my book about German aircraft armament in WWII. It will be published by Motorbuch Verlag Stuttgart in the next months.
Sincerely,
Gunter
Just have in mind, some of these drawings are sadly very inaccurate or even fictional.
 
Last edited:
does anyone know more about the Trommelanlage rocket pods?
i can't seem to find much about them?

it is really interesting reading this thread again though.

1763759236722.png
 

Attachments

  • 110.jpg
    110.jpg
    716.8 KB · Views: 48
  • 112.jpg
    112.jpg
    960.9 KB · Views: 56
  • 149.jpg
    149.jpg
    639.9 KB · Views: 54
  • 105.jpg
    105.jpg
    448.8 KB · Views: 47
  • 089.jpg
    089.jpg
    1.6 MB · Views: 46
  • 246.jpg
    246.jpg
    1.5 MB · Views: 46
  • 441.jpg
    441.jpg
    2.2 MB · Views: 42
Last edited:
The Natter armament consisted of 24 gyro-stabilized 73-mm rockets Hs 217 Föhn that were to be fired in a single salvo from the shortest possible distance from the target.

The rockets were stored in a cylindrical honeycomb container mounted on the nose, with a system for laterally discharging the gases produced during shooting, called Abgasableitung openings, located on either side of the forward fuselage.

The Ba 349 B was designed to increase the powered flight endurance using one HWK 109-509 B-1 rocket engine, with an additional low-thrust cruising combustion chamber for economic cruise, and increased propellants tankage. This led to a 10 per cent speed decrease, but Type B could maintain combat altitude for eight minutes and could destroy several bombers, multiplying its effectiveness.

It was necessary to modify its armament by installing two MK 108/30 guns under the pilot's seat and replacing the honeycomb container with a cylinder containing 32 fin-stabilized 55-mm rockets of the type R4M Orkan.

The R4M had the same ballistics characteristics as the 30 mm shells from MK 108 cannon and both weapons could be fired with the help of one Revi 16 B gunsight.

The rocket had a range of 1,800 meters and it was estimated that, from such distance, a salvo of twenty-four units had a field of fire of 30 x 14 meters, approximately the size of a B-17 US bomber. The salvo was electrically fired by means of one automatic sequencer Schaltwalze at 50 milliseconds intervals.

A single R4M should be enough to destroy a heavy bomber and the Schaltwalze could be programmed to fire only four or five rockets at a time.

Spin-Stabilized Rockets


In 1936 research started to provide the Luftwaffe with a Bordrakete unguided rocket capable of being launched from any airplane. After the testing performed at the research center of Tarnewitz in 1937 it was decided to manufacture the RZ 65B (Rauch Zylinder) model proposed by the Rheinmetall-Borsig Company.

It was a spin-stabilized rocket of 73-mm caliber fitted with a RaZ 51 (Raketenaufschlag zünder) nose percussion fuse and a powerful explosive charge of 280 gr. of RDX/TNT able, in theory, to shoot down a heavy bomber in just one impact.

The rotation was achieved with six inclined exhaust venturis located at the base of the cylinder, following the Baron von Unge system, improved by Krupp in 1909.

It was a practical design, easy to store, that could be shot from a tube (Einzelschussrohr) by means of an electrically activated percussion mechanism. The launcher had a slightly higher caliber (75-mm) and the rocket was kept at the center of the tube thanks to the three longitudinal fins fixed to its inner walls to allow the gases to be expelled with minimum friction.

The Germans used many types of rockets based on this principle throughout the war:

The Nebelwerfer Wurfgerät W.Gr 21, 28 and 32 were successfully used as front line weapons of the Heeresartillerie and a derivative of the RZ 65B, the 7.3-cm Propagandagranate, was used for distributing propaganda leaflets.

On the other hand, its use from airplanes proved to be a failure for different reasons:

The process of the venturis drilling at the rocket base was a costly operation that did not adapt well to the German tactics of mass production. The result was not very accurate, affecting the rocket flying path until making it unpredictable. During further tests performed in November 1941, it was proved that after 544 launches only 15% had hit a target with the size of a bomber. In comparison the MG/FF guns of 20-mm, considered an average “transition” design in 1940, had a 26% rate of good shots

The low quality of the DEGN powder as propellant provided the RZ 65B practical range of just 250 m. This meant that the launch airplane had to fly well into the 100 yards area covered by the artillery of the B-17.



The Luftwaffe did many tests in 1941 trying to adapt the RZ 65B to the design of the airplanes in service at the time. Multiple launchers of four tubes were installed under the wings of a Messerschmitt Bf 109 F-2 and a F-4/R1 and of six tubes in a Focke-Wulf Fw 190 F-9 reaching the conclusion that a salvo of eight to twelve rockets had no possibility to hit a bomber at more than 100 m. The installation of 12 tubes grouped together under the fuselage of the Messerschmitt Bf 110 V19 and of 16 tubes under the wings of a Junkers Ju 88 P-4 did not achieve better results.

The automatic launcher Trommelgerät was also built with one single tube and a revolver-type drum with seven rockets. The testing was done using a Ju 88 A-4 and the Me 210 V4 proving to have insufficient rate of fire.

A configuration of one single tube, mounted under the rear fuselage of a Messerschmitt Bf 110 E-2 and that should shoot sideways when passing besides a bomber, was tested at Tarnewitz.

After 3,000 test launches, the OKL reached the conclusion that the RZ 65B could only be used from ground Flakbatteries against low-flying aircraft. To that purpose, a special launcher named “7.3 cm Föhn Gerät” was built. It was a conventional box launcher that could fire thirty-five rockets in 5 x 7 rows. The launching tubes were replaced by open cells of quadrangular section.

The 360º mount could be elevated -10 to +90-degrees by a layer situated in a steel box on the inner left. Rockets could be fired in a single salvo only.

Another two rockets named RZ 73 and RZ 100, both scaled-up versions of the RZ 65B, were designed by Rheinmetall-Borsig. The RZ 73 was a heavy rocket with a caliber of 158-mm. that was fly tested by a Bf 110 without any positive result. It was decided to transfer its production to the Schneider KG Company to be used in Flakbatteries as RZ 15/8 or RZ 75.

The RZ 100 was a Pulkzerstörer (formation destroyer) rocket with a caliber of 420-mm, a length of 1,650 mm and 730 kg of weight. The ground testing from a launch ramp offered good results but its use from airplanes proved not to be feasible.

During the first launch from the fuselage of a Me 210 the torsion-effect and the powerful blast generated by the twelve venturis produced extensive damage in the airplane and the project had to be left aside.



The use of progressively more powerful guns onboard the airplanes in 1944 reached the limits of design making the need for practical air-to-air rocket urgent. It was decided to perfectioning the RZ 65B with a new engine based on cordite which was able to reach a speed of 360-437 m/sec and a range of 1,200 m

The stability was increased by shortening the venturis and reducing the length of the rocket in 26-mm. To the original RaZ 51 fuse a timed self-igniting device was added for safety in case of a miss.

The RZ 65 was modified as anti-tank weapon with armor piercing warhead, carried by Fw 190 A-3/U2 schlacht (assault) airplanes.

The new rocket was named Föhn and manufactured in number of 15,000 units by the Henschel company since September 1944. It was known as Hs 217 in its air to air version and R.Spgr. 4609 (Raketensprenggranate) in its Flak version. The latest could be shot from the “Föhn Gerät” launchers that have already went into service with the RZ 65B to cover river crossings at Hahn, Satzvoy and Unkel and in some railway flat cars as well as mobile weapon mounted on 3.7 cm Flak 18 carriage.

A “Föhn Gerät” named “Vielfachwerfer Föhn” was also planned for the Kriegsmarine with eighty rockets. At least the destroyer Z34 received them during spring of 1945.

At the beginning of 1945 some testing was performed with the AA infantry weapon. Based upon the Hs 217 it was a “Einzelschussrohr” sheaf of three tubes that shot from the shoulder like a Panzerschreck.

It also had secondary use against fortifications and ground vehicles and there were projects with five and seven tubes. All of them were electrically shot using the electromechanical shooting system of a Panzerschreck.

Some designs of armored glider-fighters and rammers foresaw the use of several Föhn rockets to be shot from a very short distance against the bombers. The Arado Ar E.381-I parasite rocket fighter carried six Einzelschussrohre in the wing roots. The armored glider-fighter Zeppelin Fliegende Panzerfaust carried two Einzelschussrohre to both sides of the fuselage. The expendable VTOL rocket fighter Bachem Ba 349 Natter carried a sheaf of 24 hexagonal tubes named Bienenwabe B3-24 (codename Krokus) in the nosecone with electromechanical triggers to be launched in a single salvo from a distance to the target of 100 m. A previous version of 28 tubes, named Raketenwabe was not considered safe for its tendency to explode when the gas exhausts saturated the launcher.

After the failure in the development of their own rockets the Luftwaffe tried to adapt some of the Heeresartillerie designs for the air-to-air use.

The first one was the Wurfgranate WGr.42 with a caliber of 210-mm. It was a spin-stabilized heavy rocket designed to be launched from a Nebelwerfer NbW 42 five-barreled artillery weapon. The base was closed by a Venturi block with 22 nozzles each angled at 16-degrees.

The Luftwaffe’s version “Bordsprengrakete 1943” was named W.Gr 21 (Wurfgranate 21- cm) with a length of 1,250-mm, a weight of 109.55 kg of which 10.17 were of Hexogen explosive and 18.27 of Diglykol propellant. Its speed was 320 m/sec and the range 2,200 m. It was fitted with a RaZ 51 impact fuse and a S/30 time-fuse, the warhead being detonated at a pre-set distance between 600 and 1,200 m with high lethality zone of 30 m.

During the first half of 1943 the Erprobungsstelle testing of adaptation to the airplanes in service started at Tarnewitz.

Werferrohr tubes with a single rocket were installed under the wings of three Fw 190 F-8 doing successful ground launches.

It was patent during the flight shooting tests that the W.Gr. 21 suffered considerable deviations on its path. Starting from 1,000 m onwards, it falls 50 m under the launch level. To correct that flaw the tubes were installed with a +7-degrees pitch calculated to make the rockets converge at 1,400 m. They were fired electrically by means of an ERZ 38 low-tension detonator. Although not very accurate, they achieved certain success during the second half of 1943 and 1944 when aimed with a Revi 16F gunsight shooting from Fw 190, Bf 109 and Bf 110 that carried two Werferrohr tubes under each wing.

The AG 40 assembly (Abschussgerät) consisting of two Werferrohr tubes mounted in a vertical configuration, one above the other, were also installed in some Fw 190s. When two AG 40 were installed together, the assembly was named Vierersätz. They were tested at least in a Ju 88 A-4.

Two lines of six Werferrohr tubes with a pitch of +67-degrees were experimentally installed in the fuselage, behind the cabin, of a Ju 88. This setting of armament was named Reaktiver Bewaffnung and was shot like the Schräge Musik guns of the night fighters, aiming with a Revi 16B gunsight.

Several devices of the revolver drum type were designed for the automatic launching

-The Vierlingswerfer of four tubes with an aerodynamic container to be transported under the wings and fuselage of the Ar 234 C

-The Werferdrehling of six tubes that should be installed in the nose of a Me 410 A-2 and that was ground tested with little success

-The Trommelmagazin of 12 tubes designed to be installed in the fuselage of a Ju 88 G-1

-The Do-Werfer, a variant of the Werferdrehling for the Ju 88C

-A similar system was installed in a Henschel Hs 129 B

-Krebs-Gerät.

Some operational tests were conducted with a single aft-firing W.Gr.21 rocket. The Werferrohr was mounted +7-degrees beneath the fuselage of several Fw 190 A-8 of the JG 3 to be shot rearwards against the bomber “boxes” after a conventional attack with guns.

This device was named Partian shot by the Allies due to its similarity to the last arrow that the old Scythe horsemen launched backwards when retreating after an attack. The W.Gr.21 was used in combat by the Bf 109 G-5/R2, G-6/R2 and G-10/R2, by the Bf 110 F-2 and G-2/R3, by the Fw 190 A-4/R6 and A-8/R6 and by the Me 262 A-1a of the JG 7.

By the beginning of 1944 several launches of the powerful W.Gr. 28/32 rockets of Rheinmetall-Borsig, performed from airplanes, tested its potential use as antitank weapon. They had been designed as front-line artillery that could be shot from its own packing box Packkiste, from an Schweres Wurfgerät 40 improvised ramp, from the Nebelwerfer 41 launcher, from the SdKfz 251, half-track vehicle Stuka-zu-Fuss or from the deck of an immersed Type IX C U-Boat Do 38 Gerät.

In spite its versatility the use of these rockets for air-to-ground purposes turned out to be impossible due to the low accuracy of its flight path.

Some testings were performed at Tarnewitz installing double launchers under the wings of a Fw 190 A-5/R6 and under the fuselage of a Henschel 129 B. There was also a project of automatic launcher of six tubes, to be installed in a Ju 88 C.

The W.Gr.28 (Wurf Granate Spreng 28-cm) was a high explosive demolition rocket of 280-mm of caliber, 1,190-mm of length and 83 kg of weight. The warhead contained 50 kg of Amatol/TNT 40/60. The propellant charge was 6.6 kg of Diglykol. There were 26 Venturis drilled with a pitch of 12-degrees in the rocket base and it had a range of 1,925 m.

The W.Gr.32 (Wurf Granate Flamm 50) was an incendiary rocket of 320-mm of caliber with the same engine than the W.Gr.28 and a warhead filled with 50 lt. of Flammöl Nr. 19, an inflammable fluid made up of kerosene and diesel oil with magnesium fuse. Its length was 1,289-mm and weighed 79 kg. Its range was 2,200 m.

In an attempt improve the accurateness of the rockets, the Kurt-Osterrode Company modified the W.Gr. 28 to convert it from a spin-stabilized to a fin-stabilized weapon. To that purpose, the rocket base was replaced by another in which the Venturis were drilled with a 0-degrees pitch and four forward swept fins with a span of 290-mm were fixed to the outer part of the engine.

The new 14WK BS (Wurfkörper Brandschrapnelrakete) rocket was launched by means of AG 200 rails in triple mountings and weighted 80 kg. The plan was to use it for the Arado Ar 234 Werferzerstörer (ground attack specialized) version that could transport nine rockets under the engines and the fuselage.

The manufacturing of the Skoda 10.5-cm spin-stabilized Flakrakete of 19 kg of weight started in 1945. The launcher was named 10.5-cm RW (Raketenwerfer) and contained 16 rockets. It was manufactured to be used over a 8.8 Flak carriage, over a Panther tank, and also in naval version.

Other spin-stabilized rockets were used to deploy AA cable barrages against low flying airplanes.

Rheinmetall-Borsig built the RSK 1000 (Drahtseil-Rakete). It consisted of several rocket engines of 210 mm that shot from vertical tubes located along the outer perimeter of an airfield. When this was attacked by low-flying airplanes, the rockets were shot towing behind them a 1000 m. length cable of steel. When the rocket reached maximum altitude, a parachute positioned instead of the warhead was opened-out and the cable went slowly down. An airplane colliding against it would suffer serious structural damage and the others were forced to fly higher, thus being reached by the light Flak.

A similar system was also built for the Kriegsmarine. The RSK 2000 was based on the R.Sprg L/4.8 naval rocket of 86-mm. There was also an anti-aircraft version named Kurhessen that used the RAg 42 launcher.

An improvement of the system was developed by Krupp AG-Essen with its medium-level Kz.1000 barrage. It used 152-mm rockets and 900 m cables that, not being fixed to the ground, raised themselves up. A parachute of 3,356-mm diameter opened out at the upper end and another, of 153-mm, with an explosive warhead of 1 kg, at the lower end.











Solid-propellants rockets


All three German manufacturers of RATO rockets used the same solid propellant produced by Westfählische-Anhalt Spengstoff (WASAG): Diglycoldinitrat formed by a mixture, by weight, of nitrocellulose (63%), diethylene glycol nitrate (35%), carbamite (0.5%), wax (0.2%) and graphite (1.2%).

Schmidding 109-513, 1,000 kg peak thrust, 2,220-mm length and 350-mm diameter, used in the Henschel Hs 293H and Hs 298 gliding bombs.

Schmidding 109-533, 1,000-1,200 kg peak thrust, 1,540-mm length and 255-mm diameter, used in the Bachem Natter, the Heinkel He 162 A-10/A-11, Heinkel P. 1077 Romeo I & II, Heinkel P.1077 Julia, Junkers EF 126 Elli, DFS Eber II and DVL Jagdsegler II rammers, in the Zeppelin Fliegende Panzerfaust and in the Zeppelin Rammer.

Schmidding 109-543, 150 kg peak thrust, 810-mm length and 178-mm diameter, used in the air-to-air missile Henschel Hs 298.

Schmidding 109-553, 1,750 kg peak thrust, 2,370-mm length and 168-mm diameter, used in the anti-aircraft missile Enzian E-4.

Schmidding 109-563, 500 kg peak thrust, 990-mm length, 168-mm diameter, used in the Messerschmitt P. 1103 rammer.

Schmidding 109-573, launch tests under water.

Schmidding 109-593, 750 kg peak thrust, 990-mm length, 168-mm diameter, RATO.

Schmidding 109-603, 150 kg peak thrust, designed for the Ruhrstahl-Kramer X-4 air-to-air missile, project only.

Rheinmetall-Borsig 109-502, 600-900 kg peak thrust, 1,270-mm length, 175-mm diameter, RATO.

Rheinmetall-Borsig 109-505, 500 kg peak thrust, 1,270-mm length, 178-mm diameter, used in the anti-aircraft missile LFA Feuerlilie 25.

Rheinmetall-Borsig 109-515, 4,000 kg peak thrust, 1,958-mm length, 146-mm diameter, used in the anti-aircraft missile LFA Feuerlilie 55.

Rheinmetall-Borsig 109-525, 7,500 kg peak thrust, 1,300-mm length, 510-mm diameter, used in the anti-aircraft missile Rheinmetall-Borsig Rheintochter R1.

Rheinmetall-Borsig 109-535, 16,000 kg peak thrust, used in the anti-aircraft missile Rheinmetall-Borsig Rheintochter R1.

Rheinmetall-Borsig 109-545, 14,000 kg peak thrust, used in the anti-aircraft missile Rheinmetall-Borsig Rheintochter R3.

WASAG 109-506, 68 kg peak trust, used in the Ruhrstahl-Kramer X-7 anti-tank missile.

WASAG 109-512, 1,200 kg peak trust, used in the Hs 293 gliding bomb.

WASAG 109-522, 1,200 kg peak thrust RATO used in the Hs 117.

WASAG 109-532, 69 kg peak trust, RATO used in the Messerschmitt P. 1104.



Diglykolnitrat composition.

-61,5% Nitrozellulose

-34,0% Diäthylenglykoldinitrat

-2,1% Diphenylmethan

-1,4% Ethylphenylmethan

-1,4% Wasser.



Fin-Stabilized Rockets (Air-to-Air)


After the low success obtained in air combat by the spin-stabilised rockets, the Rheinmetall Borsig company designed the R100 (Rakete, 100 kg) under the direction of doctors Lambrich and Vüllers.



It was a big air to air fin-stabilised rocket able to transport the same payload of HE that the 8.8-cm shells of the Flakartillerie into a bomber formation and, once there, explode causing the highest possible damage (Pulkzerstörer).



Its production was proposed in five different versions.



  • R100 M Minenkopf/Minengeschoss with conventional HE warhead and RaZ 51 impact fuse.


  • R100 BS/I Brandsplitter derived from the R100 M with incendiary pellets warhead and Doppz device (time fuse + impact fuse).


  • R100 BS-KLW Brandsplitter-Klappleitwerk derived from the BS/I with folding fins to be launched from a tube like the W. Gr21.


  • R100 BS/II, improved version of the BS/I with 1/3 more propellant and a warhead containing 400 BR/44 submunitions. They were incendiary thermite made, 20-mm long cylinders of 55 gr. that deployed in a conical pattern in front of the missile with a lethal radius of 80-100 m.
The explosion was regulated by a ZZ9B Zündanlage (time fuse + impact fuse).



  • R100 MS Minensplitter-Minen Schrapnelrakete derived from the R100 BS/II which warhead contained six submunitions with a length of 220-mm and a diameter of 50-mm, stabilized by four 8-mm. long small fins. Each submunition contained 1 kg of Hexogen and an impact fuse or a hollow charge for anti-armour attacks.
The explosion of the warhead was regulated by a ZZ9b Zündanlage or by an electro-optic proximity fuse.





LengthDiameterSpanWarhead
R100 M1,462 mm210 mm428 mmHexogen
R100 BS/I1,722 mm210 mm428 mmHe + incendiary pellets
R100 BS/KLW1,830 mm210 mm663 mmHe + incendiary pellets
R100 BS/II2,080 mm210 mm428 mmHe + incendiary pellets
R100 MS1,825 mm210 mm406 m6 x 50 mm submunitions




The R100 could be shot at distances between 600 and 2,000 meters from the target, using the automatic triggering system Oberon. This consisted of a combination of the EZ 42 Adler gyroscopic gunsight with the EG3 navigation system Elfe 3 and a radio-telemeter of the FuG 218 or FuG 248 Eule types.

The rocket was launched from one 800-mm rail of the AG 140 type. The combination of the two AG 140 was named Rüstsätz W and of three of them Rüstsätz W1.

The plan was to use the R100 in the Werfer-Zerstörer versions of the Ar 234 and Me 262 jets.

The R100 M was first fired successfully in December 1944 without an explosive charge.

In January 1945, 500 R100 BS were ordered for initial test.

The first R100 BS test took place at Tarnewitz (E2 Abteilung) in February 1945, using the Me 262 A-1a (works no. 111994) and the Fw 190 A-6 (works no. 550214) equipped with a FuG 217 J Neptun Liliput, Elfe EG3 device and EZ 42 gyro-reflex sight.



By February 28, 1945, only twenty-five R100 BS missiles had been built, ten of which had been released automatically with Oberon system without problem. An R100 fitted with infra-red equipment and acoustic fuse was reported close to operational readiness in May 1945.



Although being a very accurate and efficient weapon, its production was very costly and both the weight and the required electronic equipment for the launch prevented its use in single engine fighters.



As an alternative to the R100, Dr Fritz Heber (Kurt Heber-Osterrode) received the

order to design the smallest rocket with pop-open fins that could be launched in salvo

with the help of a Revi 16 B gunsight.

To achieve this, a Diglykol engine was used, able to accelerate it up to 550 m/sec, thus having the same ballistic characteristics of 30-mm shells of the MK 108 cannon.

The original specification required that a single rocket should be enough to destroy

a heavy bomber. Extensive study of battle casualties indicated that 400-g of Hexogen

penetrating any part of the B-17 bomber would result in their destruction.

Foreseeing that the Allies would combat with heavier airplanes of the B-29

type, it was decided to increase the explosive load up to 500 g.

The result was a rocket with a diameter of 5.4-cm and 71-cm length with eight spring-out fins and an AzRz2 impact fuse. It was named R4M Orkan (Rakete, 4Kg,

Minenkopf/Minengeschoss) rocket of 4 kg with high explosive, thin-walled warhead.

The R4M had a range of 1,800 m and it was estimated that, from such a distance, a

salvo of twenty-four rockets had a field of fire of 30 x 14 m, approximately the size of a

B-17 bomber.

From the 20,000 units ordered to the DMW-Lübeck, Siemens LGW-Görlitz, LGW

Hakenfelde, Schneider KG, and Kratzau Werke-Sudetenland at the end of 1944, around

12,000 rockets were finished before the end of the war in Europe. Circa 10,000

units were used in combat achieving the destruction of around five hundred planes.

The flight testing was done with a Me163 A-0 rocket plane. Under its wings, two

launchers with twelve rails each known as Abschussrosten were installed. The R4M were

electrically fired by means of the automatic Schaltwalze sequencer at 50-milliseconds

intervals.

Some Me 262 A-1a jet fighters of the Jagdverband 44 were equipped with

Abschussrosten in March 1945.

Some testing was done in February with launchers of seventeen and twenty-four rails

using six Me 262 A-1b in the Messerschmitt experimental plant at Oberammergau.

These airplanes were also tested in combat with great success.

The installation of the Abschussrosten was also envisaged under the wings of the Fw

190 D-9 interceptors of the I./JG 301 and of the new Ta 152 C-1/R31 and Ta 152 H-1/R11.

The hollow-charge principle was applied to the air-to-air rockets, foreseeing that they

would be necessary to fight against the great B-29 bombers that would soon enter

service.

In addition to the work at TAL and Waffen F, some research was done at the

high-explosive research Institute at Kempten and at DWM-Lübeck. DWM designed a

hollow-charge of 55-mm using an aluminized explosive filler and copper conical liner.

The R4HL (Rakete 4Kg Hollandungskopf) was produced by adapting the new

warhead to the body of an R4M. This was also known as Jägerfaust.

The plan was to use it together with the R4M in multiple launches, but it was never mass produced.

The R4HL was tested in combat by some Fw 190 A-8/9 of the JG 301.



R4M Technical Data (R4HL) (Schlange)

Length: 812-mm (790-mm)

Diameter: 55-mm (55-mm) (55-mm)

Wingspan: 215-mm (215-mm)

Total weight: 3.85 kg (-) (3.5 kg)

Maximum speed: 525 m/sec (525 m/sec) (450 m/sec)

Range: 1,500 m (1,500 m).



Fin-stabilized rockets (Anti-Tank)​





During the tests performed with different types of antitank ammunition by the Wehrmacht in 1939, the conclusion was reached that the shaped charges did not work well when used in conventional spin-stabilised shells.

The reason was that the centrifugal forces acting on the jet dispersed it losing most of its drilling power. To avoid this, a fin-stabilised hollow-charge shell known as 8-cm Raketenpanzerbüsche Granate 4992 was built and equipped with a powerful rocket with a range of 180 meters.



The Granate 4992 had 65-cm of length, the 8.8-cm hollow-charge warhead contained 0.667 kg of Cyclotol (41.2% TNT + 58.8% cyclonite) and the AZ 5095 impact fuse had a 0.0002 seconds delay.

The propellant charge was formed by seven sticks (64% nitrocellulose + 34.5% DEGN + 1% stabiliser).

The unofficial denomination of these weapons was Panzerschreck (tank terror).

They shot from a Bazooka style tube named Raketenkpanzerbüsche 43 Ofenrohr

A Flak version known as Fliegerschreck (airplane terror) was also manufactured. It consisted of a new 8.8-cm grenade with a warhead length of 174-mm especially designed for its use against airplanes. It contained 144 Brandschrapnel incendiary pellets of phosphorus of 1.4 gr each and automatically exploded after running 320 meters by means of a time fuse and a charge of Nitropenta. The lethal range was 30 meters.



It was shot from an R.Pz.B.54 fitted with a special gunsight calculated for airplanes with a wingspan of 12 meters flying at low altitude.



The DWM firm manufactured 500 Fliegerschreck sets in 1945.

The increasing number of Soviet armoured vehicles forced the creation of new air units specialised in the anti-tank fight. New versions of airplanes were built to perform this task and new “wonder weapons” were designed to be transported by them.



Some of the best antitank guns of the Wehrmacht were modified for their airborne use with poor results. Those with a low calibre should fly low and slowly to destroy the tanks whereas the heavier ones caused damages to the structure of the airplane when being shot.



While the ‘Wonder Weapons’ of SG series and new recoilless guns were being finished, it was decided to adapt some of the infantry weapons to the available Fw 190s as a provisional measure Notlösung.

The Panzerschreck was adapted by means of several designs known as Fliegende Panzerschreck and used in combat by the Fw 190 F-8.

The Fliegende Panzerschreck I consisted of a cluster of three tubes with a “C” section and 164-cm of length, joint to a semi-cylindrical holder that could hang under the ETC 50 racks.

The cluster weighted 50 kg including the electrical connections and could shoot three antitank R.Pz.BGr. 4322 grenades.

The Fliegende Panzerschreck II was formed by three tubes of R.Pz.B.54/1 with a length of 135-cm joint together in a bunch of triangular section. It was used in combat suspended under the wings of the Me 210 Ca-1 in October 1994.



The Fliegende Panzerschreck III was integrated by two overlapping tubes of R.Pz.B.54/1 with a length of 135 cm hanging under the ETC 50 racks, four of which could be carried by each Focke-Wulf Fw 190. Its code name was PD 8.8 Ausführung 1. The system contained two R.Pz.B.Gr 4992 grenades and weighted 25 kg when loaded, producing less drag than the previous model. In case of emergency, it could be dropped like a bomb. The four tubes mounting was PD 8.8 Ausführung 2.



The final design was the PD 8.8-cm Pz Büchsenrohr or PD 8.8 Ausführung 3.

It was a cluster of four tubes specially designed for aerial use. Their length was of 99.5- cm only and were joint to a central wooden structure containing the electrical contacts and the fixing mechanism to the ETC 50 racks.

The cluster had quadrangular section, a width of 18.8-cm and weighted around 45 kg. It could shoot both the R.Pz.BGr. 4992 grenades and the Fliegerschreck designed to be used against airplanes. To reduce the air drag, the wooden structure was cut in angle on its forward section and the tubes opening was covered by a frangible plastic seal.

The Fw 190 F-8 only transported two Büchsenrohr because they considerably decreased the speed of the airplane.

In August 1944, several Fw 190 F-8 armed with Parzerschreck I performed operational tests with the EK 26.

In October of the same year, the Fw 190 F-8 of the I./SG 51 performed the operational tests of the Panzerschreck II in Hungary. In January 1945, the Buchsenröhr was flight tested in Udetfeld E-Stelle with the Fw 190 F-8 (W.Nr.580383) coded CM+WL.

Other units using the Panzerschreck devices were the 5./SG77, 8/SG1 and 6./SG3.



Impressed by the efficiency of the Soviet rocket launchers Katyusha the Germans decided to manufacture their own version of the Russian rockets M-8 of 82-mm at the beginning of 1942. It was named 8-cm. Raketen Sprenggranate and had a length of 744-mm, a diameter of 78-mm and a fragmentation warhead with 0.6 kg of HE.

The Soviet aviation used their own version of the M-8 since 1937. It was known as RS-82 (Raketnij Snarjad 82-mm) and was launched from RO (Reaktivnoe Orudie) rails installed under the wings of the airplanes.

The RBS 82 variant, equipped with an armour piercing warhead and a more powerful rocket (ROFS) to destroy tanks and concrete bunkers, entered service in 1942.

The Luftwaffe adopted the idea installing rail launchers on the Henschel Hs 129 B-2 and Focke Wulf Fw 190 F-8 and F-9 airplanes, specialised on antitank fighting. They had six rails of 1,430-mm under each wing.

The Wehrmacht rocket 8-cm RSp. Gr. was renamed Panzerblitz RSp.Gr. by the Luftwaffe and operationally tested by the Hs 129 B-2 of the EKdo 26 in January 1944.

It was used in combat by the Fw 190 F-8 of the II./SG1, II./SG2, III./SG3, II./SG4 and I./SG10 with little success due to the low accuracy of the weapon that was shot with the help of a Revi 16 B gunsight.



Following the Soviet example, an armour piercing version was manufactured equipped with a warhead of 323-mm of length and an AzRz2 impact fuse. It was a longer and heavier rocket than previous one and, although having a more powerful engine, it was inaccurate when firing against targets located at more than 200 meters of distance.

To obtain good results, the pilots of the Schlacht units should fly low and slow thus suffering heavy losses by the Soviet DCA.



The armour piercing version with 970-mm of length was named Panzerblitz Pz (Panzerabwehrrakete) and could be launched from short rails of just 705-mm.

Both versions, afterwards known as Panzerblitz 1, were developed by the technical team of the Waffernwerke Brünn firm in Czechoslovakia and shared its manufacturing with DWM Lübeck.



The Panzerblitz Pz was tested on the Fw 190 A-8 W.Nr.733705 in the E-Stelle Tarnewitz at the end of 1944, being used in combat by the units 7./SG4, 8./SG4, 9./SG4, 3.(Pz)/SG9, I.(Pz)/SG9, 9./SG9, 3./SG1, 6./SG1, 9./SG2, 9./SG77, 13./SG9 and 13./SG151.

The low performance obtained in combat by Buchsenrohr and Panzerblitz 1 was consequence of their low flying speed.

These rockets were not powerful enough to follow a straight trajectory and could not be accurately aimed. It was decided to match the most powerful engine available (that of the R4M) to the best hollow-charge warhead of 8.8-cm Raketenpanzerbüchse Granate 4992.



The result was the R4MP (Rakete 4 Kg Minenkopf Panzerbüchsengranate) antitank rocket of 4 kg with armour piercing warhead and a speed of 370 m/s.

Developed and manufactured in small series by Waffenwerke Brünn, it was tested by the Luftwaffe under the name Panzerblitz Pb2.



The higher diameter of the 4992 Granate decreased the range of the weapon due to the drag.

To improve the design, a new rocket named Panzerblitz Pb 3 was built with a more powerful engine and an aerodynamic ovoid coverage in the forward area of the grenade. The AZ 5095 fuse was replaced by the Az Rz 2 impact fuse of the R4M.



Test launches were performed with the Pb3 before the end of the war obtaining speeds of 480/570 m/sec.

The Pb 4 variant was being studied using the same warhead and a speed of 600 m/sec.

The bigger diameter of the 4992 Granate prevented the launch of the Pb2 from the same devices than the R4M and it was necessary to modify the Abschussrost launcher of 12 rails into one of seven units known as AG 150.



Calib.​
Length​
Weight​
Max. speed​
Warhead type​
RS 82
82 mm​
560 mm​
6.8 Kg​
315 m/sec​
Fragmentation​
RBS 82
82 mm​
607 mm​
15 Kg​
-​
Armour piercing​
8 cm RSpGr
78 mm​
724 mm​
6.9 Kg​
290 m/sec​
Fragmentation
Panzerblitz RSp Gr
78 mm​
915 mm​
-​
290 m/sec​
Fragmentation
Panzerblitz Pz
93 mm​
705 mm​
6.54 Kg​
374 m/sec​
Armour piercing

 

Attachments

  • 008.jpg
    008.jpg
    545.9 KB · Views: 34
  • 009.jpg
    009.jpg
    1.3 MB · Views: 30
  • 011.jpg
    011.jpg
    329 KB · Views: 29
  • 018.jpg
    018.jpg
    1.2 MB · Views: 32
  • 041.jpg
    041.jpg
    877.2 KB · Views: 33
  • 088.jpg
    088.jpg
    715.4 KB · Views: 36
  • 097.jpg
    097.jpg
    2.4 MB · Views: 31
  • 105.jpg
    105.jpg
    448.8 KB · Views: 33
  • 129.jpg
    129.jpg
    2 MB · Views: 31
  • 130.jpg
    130.jpg
    1.9 MB · Views: 33
Post-2
 

Attachments

  • 131.jpg
    131.jpg
    1.9 MB · Views: 35
  • 132.jpg
    132.jpg
    2 MB · Views: 30
  • 149.jpg
    149.jpg
    639.9 KB · Views: 35
  • Picture1.jpg
    Picture1.jpg
    250.8 KB · Views: 30
  • Picture2.jpg
    Picture2.jpg
    268.7 KB · Views: 28
  • Picture3.jpg
    Picture3.jpg
    261.9 KB · Views: 34
  • Picture4.jpg
    Picture4.jpg
    245.9 KB · Views: 37
  • Picture5.jpg
    Picture5.jpg
    391.7 KB · Views: 35
  • Picture6.jpg
    Picture6.jpg
    292.8 KB · Views: 36
  • Picture7.jpg
    Picture7.jpg
    210.4 KB · Views: 38
POST-3
 

Attachments

  • Picture8.jpg
    Picture8.jpg
    343.6 KB · Views: 39
  • Picture9.jpg
    Picture9.jpg
    419.7 KB · Views: 42
  • Picture10.jpg
    Picture10.jpg
    210.6 KB · Views: 41
  • Picture11.jpg
    Picture11.jpg
    194 KB · Views: 35
  • Picture12.jpg
    Picture12.jpg
    385.6 KB · Views: 38
  • Picture13.jpg
    Picture13.jpg
    281.9 KB · Views: 39
  • Picture14.jpg
    Picture14.jpg
    419.7 KB · Views: 43
  • Picture15.jpg
    Picture15.jpg
    213.3 KB · Views: 42
  • Picture16.jpg
    Picture16.jpg
    221 KB · Views: 39
  • Picture17.jpg
    Picture17.jpg
    241.5 KB · Views: 40
POST-4
 

Attachments

  • Picture18.jpg
    Picture18.jpg
    140.8 KB · Views: 36
  • Picture19.jpg
    Picture19.jpg
    163.7 KB · Views: 36
  • Picture20.jpg
    Picture20.jpg
    162.8 KB · Views: 38
  • Picture21.jpg
    Picture21.jpg
    360.1 KB · Views: 42
  • Picture22.jpg
    Picture22.jpg
    222.8 KB · Views: 48
  • Picture23.jpg
    Picture23.jpg
    175.3 KB · Views: 47
  • Picture24.jpg
    Picture24.jpg
    289 KB · Views: 43
  • Picture25.jpg
    Picture25.jpg
    309.6 KB · Views: 51
Well, some notices and observations that came to my mind, part one:

After the testing performed at the research center of Tarnewitz in 1937 it was decided to manufacture the RZ 65B (Rauch Zylinder) model proposed by the Rheinmetall-Borsig Company.

RZ 65 was developed by Donar, not Rh-B.

It was a spin-stabilized rocket of 73-mm caliber fitted with a RaZ 51 (Raketenaufschlag zünder) nose percussion fuse and a powerful explosive charge of 280 gr. of RDX/TNT able, in theory, to shoot down a heavy bomber in just one impact.

The RAZ 51 fuze was used by the late war 7,3 cm R.Sprgr. RZ 65 could use AZ 65, ZZ 1577 or a Dopp.Z. fuzes. 280 g of HE is also not correct for the RZ 65, which carried 130-190 g HE.

The rotation was achieved with six inclined exhaust venturis located at the base of the cylinder, following the Baron von Unge system, improved by Krupp in 1909.

RZ 65 with smokeless propellant had SEVEN angled nozzles as well as seven straight ones.
Early RZ 65 with a blackpowdder engine had only six angled nozzles.

During further tests performed in November 1941, it was proved that after 544 launches only 15% had hit a target with the size of a bomber. In comparison the MG/FF guns of 20-mm, considered an average “transition” design in 1940, had a 26% rate of good shots

These tests were conducted in Tarnewitz in 1943. The target size was 4x4 m, not “size of a bomber”. 544 is the number of 2 cm MG FF projectiles fired, with a hit ratio of 26%, while only 93 of RZ 65 were fired in salvos of 4, with the hit ratio of 15%, while further 64 rockets were launched in salvos of 12, with only 6% hit ratio.

The low quality of the DEGN powder as propellant provided the RZ 65B practical range of just 250 m. This meant that the launch airplane had to fly well into the 100 yards area covered by the artillery of the B-17.

According to the 1943 manual, RZ 65 were to be launched at a bomber formation from a distance of 1000 m.

Another two rockets named RZ 73 and RZ 100, both scaled-up versions of the RZ 65B, were designed by Rheinmetall-Borsig. The RZ 73 was a heavy rocket with a caliber of 158-mm. that was fly tested by a Bf 110 without any positive result. It was decided to transfer its production to the Schneider KG Company to be used in Flakbatteries as RZ 15/8 or RZ 75.

RZ 73 had 73 mm calibre. The rocket of the 158 mm calibre was the RZ 15/8 and it was derived from the 15 cm Nebelwerfer engine rather than RZ 65.
Unguided Flak rockets were in development from 1941 indeed, but they were of the 21 cm calibre and HASAG was not involved in their production then.

During the first launch from the fuselage of a Me 210 the torsion-effect and the powerful blast generated by the twelve venturis produced extensive damage in the airplane and the project had to be left aside.

The project was continued long after the initial tests and reduction of blast effect was eventually achieved.

It was decided to perfectioning the RZ 65B with a new engine based on cordite which was able to reach a speed of 360-437 m/sec and a range of 1,200 m.

The modified rocket could reach 280 m/s only. Max. velocity of the smokeless RZ 65 varied from 260 to 306 m/s depending on the variant, while 360 m/s was to be achieved by the RZ 73.

The stability was increased by shortening the venturis and reducing the length of the rocket in 26-mm. To the original RaZ 51 fuse a timed self-igniting device was added for safety in case of a miss.

No, length of the venturis was not changed and the new rocket was actually 15 mm longer than the RZ 65, due to the protruding RAZ 51 fuze.
Venturis were shortened indeed, but during transition from blackpowder to smokeless propellant somewhere around 1939 IIRC, not during the development of the AA rocket in 1943.

The new rocket was named Föhn and manufactured in number of 15,000 units by the Henschel company since September 1944.

No, the rocket was not named Foehn, the name Foehn refers to the launcher only, and was in production much earlier than September 1944, as it was in combat use already in the mid 1944.
Henschel had NOTHING in common with this weapon.

It was known as Hs 217 in its air to air version and R.Spgr. 4609 (Raketensprenggranate) in its Flak version.

It was not known as the Hs 217, the only actual designations I’ve ever encountered are 7,3 cm R-Spgr (or 7,3 cm R Spgr) during its development and 7,3 cm R.Sprgr after it was fielded. Also a combat rocket could not bear the 4609 number, as numbers ending with 9 denoted a drill ammunition in this designation system. If the 7,3 cm R.Sprgr ever received a four digit type number, it has to be proven.

The latest could be shot from the “Föhn Gerät” launchers that have already went into service with the RZ 65B to cover river crossings at Hahn, Satzvoy and Unkel and in some railway flat cars as well as mobile weapon mounted on 3.7 cm Flak 18 carriage.

The Foehn launcher never used RZ 65 rockets, as 7,3 cm R.Sprgr was developed for this weapon. It was also not mounted on the 3,7 cm Flak 18 carriage.

A “Föhn Gerät” named “Vielfachwerfer Föhn” was also planned for the Kriegsmarine with eighty rockets. At least the destroyer Z34 received them during spring of 1945.

Naval 7,3 cm R.Ag. launchers were 35 shot, quite similar to the land based variant, although they fired rockets in two salvos.

The first one was the Wurfgranate WGr.42 with a caliber of 210-mm.

Actual calibre of the 21 cm Wgr. 42 Spr. was 214 mm.

They were fired electrically by means of an ERZ 38 low-tension detonator.

Low voltage igniter, not detonator. As well as EAZ 43 and EAZ 44.

The Luftwaffe’s version “Bordsprengrakete 1943” was named W.Gr 21 (Wurfgranate 21- cm) with a length of 1,250-mm, a weight of 109.55 kg of which 10.17 were of Hexogen explosive and 18.27 of Diglykol propellant. Its speed was 320 m/sec and the range 2,200 m. It was fitted with a RaZ 51 impact fuse and a S/30 time-fuse

These weights are only approximate, as they vary widely even in original German documents. RAZ 51 impact fuze was never used in the W.Gr. 21, only the Zt.Z. S/30 time and R-Dopp. Z. S/60 double action fuzes.

or from the deck of an immersed Type IX C U-Boat Do 38 Gerät.

The rockets launched underwater were actually 30 cm Wk 42 Spr, not 28/32 cm Wk.

In an attempt improve the accurateness of the rockets, the Kurt-Osterrode Company modified the W.Gr. 28 to convert it from a spin-stabilized to a fin-stabilized weapon. To that purpose, the rocket base was replaced by another in which the Venturis were drilled with a 0-degrees pitch and four forward swept fins with a span of 290-mm were fixed to the outer part of the engine.

The fins were folding, they were not forward swept and their span unfolded was some 62 cm.
The company was Curt Heber Maschinen-Apparate-Fabrik of Osterode and they developed the launcher only rather than the rocket.

The manufacturing of the Skoda 10.5-cm spin-stabilized Flakrakete of 19 kg of weight started in 1945. The launcher was named 10.5-cm RW (Raketenwerfer) and contained 16 rockets. It was manufactured to be used over a 8.8 Flak carriage, over a Panther tank, and also in naval version.

All we know of this weapon is a short mention in a single Allied CIOS report, which does not describe the rocket as a spin stabilized, contrary, judging from the long launcher rails and their construction, leaving free space around the projectile body, it was clearly fin stabilized. Also the launcher documented with photos is not 16 shot (the report does not say a word about the number of rails and I counted 22). The tank chassis of the SP variant is not specified at all in the description.

A similar system was also built for the Kriegsmarine. The RSK 2000 was based on the R.Sprg L/4.8 naval rocket of 86-mm.

There was a couple of wire barrage naval 8,6 cm rockets, including 8,6 cm RDg 400 (early designation DSR 400) and 8,6 cm RDg 1000 (aka DSR 1000), just not the RSK 2000.
 
Last edited:
Panzerblitz - Improvised Launcher for Ground Deployment (Behelfserdeinsatz)

Chief TLR War Diary:
March 16, 1945 – April 4, 1945

Meeting at Carinhall with the Reichsmarschall

[1] March 25, 1945
For ground-based anti-tank operations, suitable equipment is to be developed based on the R4 propulsion system with a combat range of 300 to 500 meters.

[2] The Reichsmarschall requests the improvised ground deployment of the Panzerblitz II (R 4 HL) air-to-ground rocket for anti-tank combat at ranges of 300 to 500 meters. A mobile mount is to be constructed in the simplest possible design utilizing existing tail wheels.

[3] Amtsgruppe Flak-E und Rüstung
1.) R 4 HL 88
Tests E 6 – R 4 M - Panzerfaust warhead - mount – mobility
(*The document is partially illegible due to damage.)

Source: Bundesarchiv
Signatur: RL 3/2567
Page: [1] 291, [2] 307, [3] 319*

Direct Link:
https://invenio.bundesarchiv.de/invenio/direktlink/ff268edd-8129-450a-b0e4-6a35d48fc287/
 
Last edited:
although i see many errors in the naming and details of stuff in the drawings of Miranda,
i do really wonder, what is there to find about the panzerblitz 3 (R4/HL)? apart from the few mentions we have and some images we have. we don't really know anything else about it, if it was tested, where, and perhaps if it was used.

also Miranda's rocket pods for the arado 234 constantly flip between 20 x panzerblitz 2 per pod and 30 x R4/M per pod.
yet weren't those pods designed for only the 55mm R4 body? thus meaning it should actually be the R4/HL that it also can carry instead of the 88mm Panzerblitz 2? and shouldn't that also be 30 per pod?

not to mention, i can barely find anything about these pods. except some excerpts there where plans for it / minor development (i think)???
 
Back
Top Bottom