Motocar's Cutaway drawings

martinbayer

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Joined
Jan 6, 2009
Messages
509
Reaction score
28
It seems to be one of the Avro Canada designs associated with their Project Y, see for example http://www.laesieworks.com/ifo/lib/AVRO-Omega.html and a similar configuration at https://goo.gl/images/mQXXqJ
 

Motocar

I really should change my personal text
Joined
May 16, 2014
Messages
577
Reaction score
16
Thanks martinbayer for your coments...! Motocar
 

Motocar

I really should change my personal text
Joined
May 16, 2014
Messages
577
Reaction score
16
Cutaway Mikoyan Gurevich MiG-15SB, "Shturmovik" jet ground attack model, author Aviagraphica and retoched by Motocar to recreated this model (viewed 23 times.)
 

Attachments

Foo Fighter

I came, I saw, I drank some tea (and had a bun).
Joined
Jul 19, 2016
Messages
736
Reaction score
20
Very good, same high standard throughout.
 

Motocar

I really should change my personal text
Joined
May 16, 2014
Messages
577
Reaction score
16
Cutaway Moshier Aurora 400, Highly speculative schematic cut of the failed project of Michael W. Moshier to create a very advanced VTOL for its time that made use of the "Ejector Lift" technology previously used in the prototype Lockheed XV-4A, which had great difficulties in its development, based In that technology his creator thought about devising, a simpler vehicle that did not go beyond reports in aviation specialized magazines and the publicity appeared in magazines such as Popular Mechanics to later be present in the classified ads of the same magazine at the end of the eighties, here I leave you a cutaway in a free interpretation on it, soon I will add the key. Motocar
 

Attachments

Motocar

I really should change my personal text
Joined
May 16, 2014
Messages
577
Reaction score
16
Greetings friends, I'm looking for these cutaways the MiG-17 appeared in the magazine Air Enthusiast of November / December 1995, also the Rockwell T-2 published in the magazines Air Enthusiast October 1973 T-2 Buckeye and the T-2C Buckeye in the edition of the International Air magazine June 1975


Motocar
 

Motocar

I really should change my personal text
Joined
May 16, 2014
Messages
577
Reaction score
16
Cutaway Rockwell XFV-12A, the unsuccessful supersonic fighter S / VTOL for the US Navy that had issued a requirement for a fighter with higher performance than the BAC Harrier or McDonnell Douglas AV-8A, used another principle by derivation of the engine flow to the planes , the purge of the air sucked more flow from the outside, increasing the thrust to obtain the vertical thrust and make transitions from vertical to horizontal flight, after numerous tests it was considered more complicated and the concept was rejected. Author WEAL and modified by Motocar to recreate this forgotten fighter
 

Attachments

Motocar

I really should change my personal text
Joined
May 16, 2014
Messages
577
Reaction score
16
Cutaway Rockwell HIMAT Fighter Concept of a micro-hunt for sr carried in the holds of a Boeing 747, specially modified for that role of Flying aircraft carrier, the idea did not prosper beyond conceptualizations and diverse concepts ntre lod that there was one with wings of variable geometry, work merely speculative baado in the well-known cutaway of HIMAT published in Flight magazine in the late seventies or early eighties, modified by Motocar
 

Attachments

Motocar

I really should change my personal text
Joined
May 16, 2014
Messages
577
Reaction score
16
GTX said:
Nice work. What gun(s) it is using?
The cannon is a model "Twin tube" model not specified in the proposal, I imagine that for the tiny size it was not feasible to assemble it with a 20mm Vulcan cannon, it was a proposed solution like the twin tube GSh 23mm of the MiG-21 / 23
 

Motocar

I really should change my personal text
Joined
May 16, 2014
Messages
577
Reaction score
16
Cutaway Mikoyan Gurevich MiG-13, author unknow and modified by Motocar to recreated this soviet fighter613298
 

Motocar

I really should change my personal text
Joined
May 16, 2014
Messages
577
Reaction score
16
Cutaway Nord Grifon II

613338
 
Last edited:

Motocar

I really should change my personal text
Joined
May 16, 2014
Messages
577
Reaction score
16
Hightly Speculative Cutaway Super Light "Zero", Cutaway Mitsubishi A6M-X "Super Zero", recently saw a Japanese "Anime" movie about the life of the designer of the Mitsubishi AM5 and AM6 Zero Jiro Horikoshi fighters, where he discussed the difficulties he had with the low power of the available engines and the need to lower the weight, saving on every gram that could be in the ribs and the coating, I came up with a diet exercise and reduced the weight as much as possible with the techniques and materials available in those years , the result was a hunt with a single main landing gear wheel with rearward retraction in the fuselage two thin fixed supports with lever suspension in the planes with low wheels for stability and a tail wheel fairing after the hitch hook, by freeing space on the wings, two supports could be installed for two separate disposable auxiliary tanks and two external supports for pumps, author WEAL and modified by Motocar

615955Cutaway Mitsubishi Super Zero.JPG
 

Attachments

Last edited:

Motocar

I really should change my personal text
Joined
May 16, 2014
Messages
577
Reaction score
16
Cutaway North American / Rockwell T-2A "Buckeye", the first version of the trainer of the US Navy, this made its first flight in 1958 and was propelled by a single engine Westinghouse J34-46 , entering service the following year after a few years underwent changes in its power plant by installing two units of the light and noisy General Electric J85 that provided bimotor security, remaining in service until the beginning of the 21st century. Author WEAL and retouched by Motocar to recreate this early and little known version of the US naval trainer.
 

Attachments

steelpillow

So many projects, so little time...
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Messages
482
Reaction score
12
Website
www.steelpillow.com
Free interpretation in speculative cutaway drawing Blohm & Voss BV-210
I hate to say it but that drawing is totally wrong. It has no place on a serious factual thread. Serously, almost nothing about it is correct. The internal structure of both wing and fuselage were innovative and very different, the idea of external munitions is absurdly against all documented armament options, the main undercarriage is positioned incorrectly, I could go on and on. Leaving it here risks seriously misleading the casual visitor and everybody who then follows up their findings. Please delete it from here and save it for your own thread.
 

djfawcett

I really should change my personal text
Joined
Dec 16, 2012
Messages
40
Reaction score
2
Free interpretation in speculative cutaway drawing Blohm & Voss BV-210
I hate to say it but that drawing is totally wrong. It has no place on a serious factual thread. Serously, almost nothing about it is correct. The internal structure of both wing and fuselage were innovative and very different, the idea of external munitions is absurdly against all documented armament options, the main undercarriage is positioned incorrectly, I could go on and on. Leaving it here risks seriously misleading the casual visitor and everybody who then follows up their findings. Please delete it from here and save it for your own thread.
Come on ....... the thread's title is "users artwork". It says nothing about a requirement that everything must be factual or has the appearance of being engineered correctly. I for one, totally enjoy Motocar's artwork.
 

archipeppe

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Joined
Oct 18, 2007
Messages
1,498
Reaction score
10
I always loved so much Motocar's works.
He specialized in a field which so few want to dirt their hands.

One thing is to clearly depict an aircraft 3 views, another stuff is to get inside even if you do a patchwork job.
You must have a technical sensibility out of common, furthermore you must still have artistic capability.

So I will still to praise Motocar for his talent, rather blame him for some error.
 

overscan

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Messages
11,240
Reaction score
381
I always loved so much Motocar's works.
He specialized in a field which so few want to dirt their hands.

One thing is to clearly depict an aircraft 3 views, another stuff is to get inside even if you do a patchwork job.
You must have a technical sensibility out of common, furthermore you must still have artistic capability.

So I will still to praise Motocar for his talent, rather blame him for some error.
Once again, Motocar doesn't create the cutaways. At most he can be credited with locating, scanning, and minor edits. Credits are due to Frank Munger, John Weal, Tim Hall, Mike Badrocke ("Aviagraphica"), Joe Picarella and other hugely talented artists.
 

archipeppe

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Joined
Oct 18, 2007
Messages
1,498
Reaction score
10
Once again, Motocar doesn't create the cutaways. At most he can be credited with locating, scanning, and minor edits. Credits are due to Frank Munger, John Weal, Tim Hall, Mike Badrocke ("Aviagraphica"), Joe Picarella and other hugely talented artists.
Sure.
That's why I talked about "patchwork job".
The starting material isn't by Motocar, but he still does some art put it togheter to obtains something different if not new.

The same thing happens in music, how may time an artist used some champion of another one to realize a brand new song?
 

overscan

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Messages
11,240
Reaction score
381
I'm not a fan personally. The terrible scanning offends my eyes.

I often edit drawings and clean up scans, but I've never felt the need to put my name inside the drawing or write "cleaned by Overscan" over the drawing.
 

archipeppe

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Joined
Oct 18, 2007
Messages
1,498
Reaction score
10
I often edit drawings and clean up scans, but I've never felt the need to put my name inside the drawing or write "cleaned by Overscan" over the drawing.
This is clear, of course if you limit your activity in cleaning-up or enhancing there is no need to put your name above it.
If you take a scan, and modify it, change it (in substantial way), or mix up two or more scans to obtain something else, in this case you added value that the original work doesn't have.

It would be fair, anyaway, to put your name after the name(s) of the original author(s) just to give the right credit. imho.
 

starviking

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2006
Messages
945
Reaction score
11
This is clear, of course if you limit your activity in cleaning-up or enhancing there is no need to put your name above it.
If you take a scan, and modify it, change it (in substantial way), or mix up two or more scans to obtain something else, in this case you added value that the original work doesn't have.

It would be fair, anyaway, to put your name after the name(s) of the original author(s) just to give the right credit. imho.
That seems to be the standard over at Shipbucket, purveyors of fine ship illustrations: real, cancelled, and imagined.
 
Top