RadicalDisconnect
Tony F.
- Joined
- 28 April 2014
- Messages
- 240
- Reaction score
- 202
Is it me or are these EO apertures very large compared to all other fighter IRSTs I’ve seen? Looks easily 50% wider than AN/ASG-34 IRST21, and the F-22 has two of them.
I'm guessing the two might be for triangulation, since IRST gives a very accurate bearing but is poor on range information.Is it me or are these EO apertures very large compared to all other fighter IRSTs I’ve seen? Looks easily 50% wider than AN/ASG-34 IRST21, and the F-22 has two of them.
I think since these are likely low resolution (single pixel, or a few dozen at most) type IRST, aka the only type that works for medium to long wave IR, because of diffraction limits, it might make sense to put on two of them, to scan the sky twice as fast, or have one track while the other scans.I'm guessing the two might be for triangulation, since IRST gives a very accurate bearing but is poor on range information.
I think since these are likely low resolution (single pixel, or a few dozen at most) type IRST, aka the only type that works for medium to long wave IR, because of diffraction limits, it might make sense to put on two of them, to scan the sky twice as fast, or have one track while the other scans.
Unlike previous images, these pods look like there is some type of window on the front of the pods. Unless it's light reflection?
You mean the white patch? I think that's a new MLG door.Is there a 3rd pod on inner left wing?
They mirror each other.Huh. That pod under the right wing (left side of the picture) is not the same shape as the one on the left wing.
Yes. In opposite directions. Or did you mean they were different in other regards??
Well, maybe the inner facet is off-set.
Inner facet on both pods is larger than the outer facet. The line where the two meet is not on the centerline of the pod, which I think was throwing me off.Yes. In opposite directions. Or did you mean they were different in other regards?