HOTOL: Britain's Spaceplane by Dan Sharp

newsdeskdan

ACCESS: Top Secret
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
11 June 2014
Messages
1,342
Reaction score
1,812
HOTOL: Britain’s Spaceplane
by
Dan Sharp

Now available for pre-order here:
HOTOL: Britain's Spaceplane

Tempest Books
ISBN: 9781911704294
Format: Hardback
Pages: 300

The start of Space Shuttle operations in 1981 marked a new era in spaceflight – with the five orbiters launching numerous satellites, interplanetary probes and the Hubble Space Telescope. But Shuttle was only partially reusable, its external fuel tank being expendable and its solid rocket boosters having to be recovered from the ocean and refurbished. Putting a satellite into orbit using a rocket was even more wasteful – with boosters such as Ariane being one-shot only. The costs were astronomical.

So when rocket scientist Alan Bond and aerospace engineer Bob Parkinson attended a British Interplanetary Society lecture on the proposed non-reusable Ariane 5 rocket in 1982, they began to discuss possible alternatives and concluded that the best solution was… an aerospaceplane.

The concept was deceptively simple – a vehicle able to take off from a conventional runway using airbreathing engines, switch to pure rocket propulsion at high altitude, fly up into space, complete its mission, then fly back down and land. Bond and Parkinson believed it could be done and HOTOL – HOrizontal Take-Off and Landing – was born.

By 1983 both British Aerospace and Rolls-Royce were backing the project. A broadcast on ITN’s New at Ten in 1984 made HOTOL famous overnight, with the whole nation now aware of its existence. The Government agreed to match-fund the companies’ financial commitment in 1985 and the work ramped up into high gear, with some of Britain’s best engineers engaged in making this remarkable vehicle a reality.

Two years later, Minister of State of Trade and Industry Kenneth Clarke declined to renew the project's funding – signalling the beginning of the end of HOTOL. Attempts to continue the project as an air-launched vehicle using the An-225 as its carrier continued into the early 1990s.

HOTOL: Britain’s Spaceplane by Dan Sharp covers the full story of HOTOL’s development in detail from beginning to end, drawing on the BAE Systems archive, the personal archives of the project’s creators and extensive interviews with those involved. It includes new artwork plus hundreds of contemporary diagrams and illustrations, ranging from full colour brochures and publicity material – both used and unused – to previously unseen diagrams and schematics of HOTOL’s numerous configurations and their associated components and technologies.

British Aerospace logo cover.jpg
 
It would be nice to see a Mortons reprint/new version of your Crecy BSP5 with Mustard written prominently on the cover as a companion volume to Hotol, not that you are busy or anything!

The rights to the Mustard book have now reverted back to me, since Crecy had 12 months (now expired) to reprint it or lose them, so a new Mortons-published version isn't impossible. However, the Hotol book would have to demonstrate first that such a thing would be viable.
Incidentally, work on Hotol is progressing rapidly...
 
Strange that only Ariane is mentionned as an exemple of expendable launcher amongst literally a myriad of them?
 
Strange that only Ariane is mentionned as an exemple of expendable launcher amongst literally a myriad of them?

Hotol was created as a direct response to Ariane 5/Hermes. And throughout its existence, it was in competition with that particular system.
 
This make perfect sense.
So, the end of Hermes did triggered the end of Hotol also?

In short: no. But the story is a lot more complicated than that. The British government decided not to continue funding Hotol during the late summer of 1987, but British Aerospace continued paying for the project itself. Then Rolls-Royce declined to continue funding the engine. BAe then switched to Interim Hotol, a pure rocket vehicle which used the An-225 to substitute for the RB.545's airbreathing stage. Then BAe Stevenage, which was leading the Interim Hotol effort (BAe Warton had led the original Hotol project) ran out of money because Hughes kept underbidding it for its main source of income - communications satellites. The Interim Hotol team were mostly laid off. The work continued with just a handful of staff members for a while, but eventually stopped because no further sources of funding were available.
Hermes did come to an end at a similar time, I think, but for unrelated reasons.
 
Hermes died at the ESA council meeting in Granada, Spain: 11/1991.
Skylon started in 1989
Interim Hotol died by 1992
HOTOL never had CNES ESA support but TBH it was more interesting - and risky - than Hermes AR5.
Also Saenger II on the german front.
Overall: a total mess. And nothing was built in the end.
 
Dan
Idea for your next book;- Project Chevaline;-

Back in the day, during my light brush with it I was told some wonderful anecdotes.
 
I'm sure Sharp's book will be very informative, personally I at least know that *some* study work on Interim HOTOL continued under the ESA WLS (Winged Launcher Study) program up to Mid-1994, so on that front it at least outlived Hermes by a bit.
 
I wonder how much of the book will have previously classified data and information? Considering that it was a UK MOD project to begin with.
 
Thanks Dan, I suppose there is only so far that you can go with the scope of the book that you had planned.

Maybe you misunderstand me. This book is going to cover everything in excruciating detail - probably more detail than anyone (except me) could want. I cover the whole project blow by blow, almost day by day, who said/did what and when, based on the primary sources courtesy of BAE Systems.
The issue of exactly how closely the Hotol project was associated with the MoD is addressed, I can assure you (it seems like you might be disappointed by what the documents reveal).
What you might be shocked by is the way the vehicle evolved over time and the incredible variety of different configurations looked at. How about a version with 10 engines built into its wings or one with a lifting body fuselage - or a nose intake?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom