Thanks to the magic of Google Translate... "I need to discuss an important topic with you, my brother Hisham. Do you have telegram??"@khalil English, please
Victor Lustig, is that you?
احتاج مناقشة موضوع مهم معك اخي هشام. هل عندك تلغرام؟؟
ᚾᛟ, ᛈᛚᛖᚨᛋᛖ ᚲᛟᚾᛏᛁᚾᚢᛖ. ᛞᛟᚾ'ᛏ ᛗᛁᚾᛞ ᚢᛋPlease brother Khalil,speak English
Is it possible to see inside these magazines online? Free of charge?From Popular Mechanics 1927.
Is it possible to see inside these magazines online? Free of charge?
Germans had little reason to build such things. For what, direct travel to USA? To colonies? It was not economically feasible and there was little chance to sell their products to the French or British who had their own big flying boats.Wow...
With eg the Boeing and Short designs ocean-hopping, how did the Germans end up with only the land-based Kondor and a couple of small-ish sea-planes ??
These are two separate, unrelated airliner designs by Karl Grulich. Of these the 10 engine one is a twin float, twin fuselage flying boat with unswept wings and a standard twin boom tail structure. The 9 engine design is the nurflugel which you mention. There is very little information on the latter project, but here is an excerpt from a 1945 article.I the book Flying Wings by Rudolf Storck on p.20 it swtates that Kar; Grulich built large aircraft for Gothaer Waggonfabrik in (from ?) 1914. In 1919 he designed a 9 engine Nurflugel-Fluboot with boomerang shaped main wing.
In this thread, all the Grulich designs have ten engined. The term nurflugel / all-wing - ie, tailless might have been misused.
Main wing implies a tailplane. Boomerang shapoed wing appears to describe the Rumpler design.
Can anyone untangle this one ?