• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

General Dynamics F-111 Projects

LowObservable

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2006
Messages
2,169
Reaction score
24
This, perhaps?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_60_CAPTOR

The FB-111H was very helpful in figuring out the Tu-22M design and performance. If you didn't have space in the back end for fuel, you were going to have limitations.
 

TomS

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2008
Messages
3,196
Reaction score
115
LowObservable said:
This, perhaps?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_60_CAPTOR
That would be my guess -- deploying CAPTOR or follow-on weapons on transit routes and bastions.

Direct attack against subs (a la nuclear depth bombs) would not generally be classified as "ASW support" but CAPTOR delivery would fit, because it was intended to channelize and disrupt Soviet submarine operations as much as to directly kill subs.
 

Orionblamblam

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2006
Messages
7,342
Reaction score
208
Website
www.aerospaceprojectsreview.com
Pioneer said:
I'm intrigued by this F-111X-7 and was hoping to learn more about its layout and configuration.
Anyone got anything on it??
Yep. Keep an eye out for US Fighter Projects #03.
http://www.aerospaceprojectsreview.com/blog/?p=3437

 

RAP

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2008
Messages
617
Reaction score
170
F111 crew module model

$5500!

www.ebay.com/itm/VINTAGE-1963-64-F111-CREW-ESCAPE-MODULE-NOT-KNOWN-TO-EXIST/123365152169?_trkparms=aid%3D777001%26algo%3DDISCO.FEED%26ao%3D1%26asc%3D20160801204525%26meid%3Db11956206a0b4c2dab11624d799b2c21%26pid%3D100651%26rk%3D1%26rkt%3D1%26%26itm%3D123365152169&_trksid=p2481888.c100651.m4497&_trkparms=pageci%3Aded261b9-b9c7-11e8-92bc-74dbd1802386%7Cparentrq%3Ae311150c1650ab6b4ad6bd93fff74286%7Ciid%3A1
 

Attachments

circle-5

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
May 31, 2009
Messages
1,161
Reaction score
46
Re: F111 crew module model

I'll wait for the price to come down 90% ...
 

blackkite

Don't laugh, don't cry, don't even curse, but.....
Joined
May 31, 2007
Messages
5,779
Reaction score
270
Hi! GD's drawing. You can see wing gear and fuselage, wing cross section.
Source :
The TFX Program: An Analysis of the McNamara
Management and Decision-Making Technique in
Major Weapon System Procurement
John Charles Sweeney
College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences
 

Attachments

Last edited:

galgot

CLEARANCE: Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2006
Messages
473
Reaction score
192
Website
galgot.com
Hi Blackkite San,
I think this is a scaleplan for an in house 1/80 display model.
 

blackkite

Don't laugh, don't cry, don't even curse, but.....
Joined
May 31, 2007
Messages
5,779
Reaction score
270
Oh sorry I must delete it?
How about cross section shape?
 

galgot

CLEARANCE: Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2006
Messages
473
Reaction score
192
Website
galgot.com
Not at all :) it was just an observation. Its a nice scaleplan and it's from GD anyway.
I believe the sections are quite correct , if a bit "adapted" to a 1/80 model.
 

blackkite

Don't laugh, don't cry, don't even curse, but.....
Joined
May 31, 2007
Messages
5,779
Reaction score
270
Thanks brilliant galgot-san.
So wing gear is only for 1/80 model?
 

galgot

CLEARANCE: Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2006
Messages
473
Reaction score
192
Website
galgot.com
indeed different from other FBs drawings or models. The engines are more widely spaced, and the volume usually placed on the big dorsal spine/ tail cone on the FB-111H, is replaced by that boat tail. much nicer.
 

TomS

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2008
Messages
3,196
Reaction score
115
Wow thanks a lot.
:cool:
I also find this picture.
No problem. Note that the second picture is from the F-14, which is somewhat different. The hydraulic servos are behind the wing pivots instead of in front of them as in the F-111, for example. And of course, the F-14 used a computer intermediary (the Mach Sweep Programmer) to match wing sweep to aircraft speed, while the F-111 has a simple mechanical linkage (the cable in your first drawing) controlled by the pilot.
 

Sundog

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2006
Messages
2,598
Reaction score
25
IIIRC, the FB-111 model shown in Allysonca's post is one of the extended range FB-111's, in that it has greatly increased internal volume for fuel. It still has the standard cockpit.
 

allysonca

CLEARANCE: Confidential
Joined
Mar 11, 2011
Messages
171
Reaction score
140
Also, here is one that everyone missed on eBay. It's the large in-house that was a super bargain. It was nasty and I planned to restore it but it arrived broken as you can see., With a bit a TLC, paint matching, and new decals, here it is restored. Irked me to no end to put the tail markings on crooked, but hey, restored is restored to what the factory produced.
 

Attachments

thefrecklepuny

CLEARANCE: Confidential
Joined
Jan 19, 2008
Messages
62
Reaction score
1
Also, here is one that everyone missed on eBay. It's the large in-house that was a super bargain. It was nasty and I planned to restore it but it arrived broken as you can see., With a bit a TLC, paint matching, and new decals, here it is restored. Irked me to no end to put the tail markings on crooked, but hey, restored is restored to what the factory produced.
Is that the model of the F-111 Mission Adaptive Wing version?
 

allysonca

CLEARANCE: Confidential
Joined
Mar 11, 2011
Messages
171
Reaction score
140
Also, here is one that everyone missed on eBay. It's the large in-house that was a super bargain. It was nasty and I planned to restore it but it arrived broken as you can see., With a bit a TLC, paint matching, and new decals, here it is restored. Irked me to no end to put the tail markings on crooked, but hey, restored is restored to what the factory produced.
Is that the model of the F-111 Mission Adaptive Wing version?
yes, the TACT F-111
 

allysonca

CLEARANCE: Confidential
Joined
Mar 11, 2011
Messages
171
Reaction score
140
Ohhhhhh, I can fix that..... is it for sale?
 

Richard N

CLEARANCE: Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2009
Messages
318
Reaction score
20
It might be;) Have anything interesting to trade?
 

Richard N

CLEARANCE: Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2009
Messages
318
Reaction score
20
I'm going to hold on to it for now, but I will keep you in mind if it ever has to leave my mess of airplanes.
 

Vahe Demirjian

I really should change my personal text
Joined
Mar 1, 2013
Messages
440
Reaction score
141
(about #50) The FB-111B and FB-111C had no canards, as far as I can tell. Any idea if a mistake was made in the illustration above?
 

Jemiba

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2006
Messages
8,001
Reaction score
164
(about #50) The FB-111B and FB-111C had no canards, as far as I can tell.
You are aware , that this is an illustration of some kind of proposal for a F-111with a longer tail, fitted with 2D thrust
vectoring ? Unfortunately we don't know the source , but though Scott is quite right about the differences in top and
side view, I think, it looks as from some kind of report, maybe not about just the F-111, but about the use of 2D thrust
vectoring.
 

Grey Havoc

The path not taken.
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
8,990
Reaction score
194
And of course, the F-14 used a computer intermediary (the Mach Sweep Programmer) to match wing sweep to aircraft speed, while the F-111 has a simple mechanical linkage (the cable in your first drawing) controlled by the pilot.
Thought the F-111D also had it's own version of a computer intermediary for wing control? Possibly the FB-111A as well.
 
Last edited:

TomS

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2008
Messages
3,196
Reaction score
115
And of course, the F-14 used a computer intermediary (the Mach Sweep Programmer) to match wing sweep to aircraft speed, while the F-111 has a simple mechanical linkage (the cable in your first drawing) controlled by the pilot.
Thought the F-111D also had it's own version of a computer intermediary for wing control? Possibly the FB-111A as well.
Not that I've seen. There was an automatic trim adjustment to compensate for wing sweep.
 

gusmobile

CLEARANCE: Restricted
Joined
Apr 21, 2019
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello to all.

Could someone please tell me whether titanium was considered to be utilized for the F-111's Wing Carry-through Box (WCB)?

With the F-111's WCB being made of D6AC steel, on strip-down for its major servicing, each aircraft underwent a
deep freeze, where its structure was put through a number of tests to see whether a major fault in the WCB would be found.

I am assuming that the F-14's use of titanium, meant that there was no requirement for a similar activity.

Thank you in advance.

Gusmobile
 
Top