You missed my point. I was referring more to Honeywell's financial considerations rather than anything technical about the engines.A PT6A is even more...
You missed my point. I was referring more to Honeywell's financial considerations rather than anything technical about the engines.A PT6A is even more...
Is it Diamond making aero engines out of Mercedes diesels?Aahh so, what UAS engine can fly 24h long mission, months along?
Yet the PWCanada engine of roughly the same horsepower is significantly more expensive. And PT6 mediums have been a thing for 30 years, so there's no R&D costs left to recoup.You missed my point. I was referring more to Honeywell's financial considerations rather than anything technical about the engines.
Have they turned them on yet or are they just testing the aircraft with the pods?
I just heard the USMC scream for their own personal AWACS birds they can fly off the LHDs.
The MQ-9A Reaper production line is closed and would take General Atomics two to three years to restart, according to a Congressional Research Service report as the Air Force ramps up its successor timeline amid inventory loss.
The service’s Reaper inventory has decreased by more than half from fiscal year 2022 to around 135 aircraft in mid-May this year as the U.S. scaled operations against Iran in Epic Fury. While legislation on the future of the aircraft and its potential replacement has been proposed, Congress must weigh certain questions regarding cost, fleet size and operational capability ahead of approving budget requests.
While the service has not officially revealed how many Reapers have been lost in the operations against Iran, the report highlights an August Washington Post analysis that claims the force lost 45 aircraft.