The York was designed to utilize a sensor-fused round that Bofors was putting into the market and due to the M42s being beloved by army troops during Vietnam, the US Army wanted a SPAAG that can do infantry support in a pinch.
May I ask what that sensor-fused ammunition was? 3P ammunition seems too advanced for that time.
 
Guess it's this one
 
Guess it's this one
So it's a standard proximity fuse, no time detonation mechanism?
 
I have not yet read that, but now it has my attention
I'll warn you, it's a ruthless depiction of warfare and requires certain suspensions of disbelief to accept (remember, it was made during the period when the idea whose summary is 'air power uber alles' was prevalent, even though it never was viable in the first place), but great reads if you can power through some stories (though the interrogation one is something that I can't power through, its far too viseral for me).
So it's a standard proximity fuse, no time detonation mechanism?
Basically, they shrank the proximity fuse* from something only viable in anything 75mm or bigger into a pretty standard 40mm anti-air round via the power of proper transistors.

Nowadays, such a fuse can easily fit into a 30mm, which is what the Stryker Dragoon is using as part of its ammo load.

EDIT:
* Please note that when the US first developed these things in WW2, they basically made them at the top of the 'prevent from reverse engineering' list. Where it used to take hundreds or thousands of rounds to kill a fighter, the ol' 76mm 55 cal Autos that this was initially paired with turned it into a few dozen... at most. They did it by literally shrinking a radar set into a 76mm or bigger round.
 
Last edited:
I'll warn you, it's a ruthless depiction of warfare and requires certain suspensions of disbelief to accept (remember, it was made during the period when the idea whose summary is 'air power uber alles' was prevalent, even though it never was viable in the first place), but great reads if you can power through some stories (though the interrogation one is something that I can't power through, its far too viseral for me).
Okay, thanks for the warning. I will look into it though.
Basically, they shrank the proximity fuse* from something only viable in anything 75mm or bigger into a pretty standard 40mm anti-air round via the power of proper transistors.
When you remember that transistors were still quite large in the late 70s/early 80s even when put onto a printed circuit board, it does look quite impressive.
Nowadays, such a fuse can easily fit into a 30mm, which is what the Stryker Dragoon is using as part of its ammo load.
30 mm seems to me like the smallest round that would make sense with a proximity fuse.
EDIT:
* Please note that when the US first developed these things in WW2, they basically made them at the top of the 'prevent from reverse engineering' list. Where it used to take hundreds or thousands of rounds to kill a fighter, the ol' 76mm 55 cal Autos that this was initially paired with turned it into a few dozen... at most. They did it by literally shrinking a radar set into a 76mm or bigger round.
I know. A 76 mm can have quite the area of effect, and shrinking the radar set to fit into a 76 with pretty much all electronics being vacuum tubes at the time was very impressive, especially considering that vacuum tubes don’t like being accelerated with the force of a high velocity cannon.
 
I found this image in a YouTube video. Does anyone have the document that it was taken from? The Creator of the video did not link it anywhere.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20250811-014103.png
    Screenshot_20250811-014103.png
    372.4 KB · Views: 234
 
Some info from a GD presentantion.
 

Attachments

  • scan0008.jpg
    scan0008.jpg
    2.3 MB · Views: 175
  • scan0007.jpg
    scan0007.jpg
    1.3 MB · Views: 158
  • scan0006.jpg
    scan0006.jpg
    1.6 MB · Views: 144
  • scan0005.jpg
    scan0005.jpg
    578.7 KB · Views: 141
  • scan0004.jpg
    scan0004.jpg
    617.5 KB · Views: 136
  • scan0003.jpg
    scan0003.jpg
    595.5 KB · Views: 138
  • scan0001.jpg
    scan0001.jpg
    857.8 KB · Views: 155
  • scan.jpg
    scan.jpg
    3.2 MB · Views: 165
  • 3.jpg
    3.jpg
    1,011.9 KB · Views: 138
  • 2.jpg
    2.jpg
    1.2 MB · Views: 113
  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 128
  • scan0011.jpg
    scan0011.jpg
    2.7 MB · Views: 187
  • scan0009.jpg
    scan0009.jpg
    678.9 KB · Views: 204
I have the entire document but did not scan the whole thing. Part of it is information on GD.
 
I am not sure how this LADS relates to the Light Air Defense System (LADS) SHORAD weapon system intended to protect the division's priority assets. Under the latter, two prototypes were tested to meet the objective design: the Vulcan Wheeled Carrier (VWC) and the Pedestal Mounted Stinger (PMS)—also known as the HMMWV Mounted Stinger (HMS). Ultimately, the Army chose PMS (which became the AN/TWQ-1 Avenger) as the primary SHORAD system for all light forces.


To further complicate things, other sources say LADS (which one?) was an earlier (relative to PMS) but highly similar proposal for an interim solution.

 
Some more pages scanned from the GD presentation.
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    2.6 MB · Views: 100
  • 2.jpg
    2.jpg
    958.9 KB · Views: 114
  • 3.jpg
    3.jpg
    3.2 MB · Views: 123
  • 4.jpg
    4.jpg
    1.3 MB · Views: 112
  • 5.jpg
    5.jpg
    744.3 KB · Views: 94
  • 6.jpg
    6.jpg
    784.8 KB · Views: 91
  • 7.jpg
    7.jpg
    664.9 KB · Views: 87
  • 8.jpg
    8.jpg
    535.5 KB · Views: 71
  • 9.jpg
    9.jpg
    765.1 KB · Views: 96
  • 10.jpg
    10.jpg
    3.2 MB · Views: 106
  • 11.jpg
    11.jpg
    3.3 MB · Views: 107
  • 12.jpg
    12.jpg
    571.3 KB · Views: 93
Would it have been viable to use the M822 proxy rounds against munitions? If so, DIVAD could have been salvaged as an anti-munition program.
Yes, the M822 was based on the Bofors PFHE MK.2 which was specifically tested against sea skimming missiles, the Exocet, and was able to trigger on it and defeat it. The Sgt. York was also able to tell missiles apart from jets so it was already a consideration to use it in that role.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom