When you say fleet size I assume you mean the total number of aircraft? I am unclear what averaging the total hours flown over this number actually tells us.

e.g. the UK intentionally buys more aircraft than are required for the "forward available fleet" in order to maintain these frontline numbers whilst aircraft undergo deep maintainance, repair or upgrade. And there is an additional buy of reserve aircraft for fatigue management and attrition replacements that are intentionally not flown in order to prolong the overall life of the fleet. In practice most of the aiframes rotate round to try to average the fatigue hours.

So averaging hours over the total fleet in this case when many aircraft are intentionally not flown doesn't tell us much. e.g. in reality the constant UK ops in Shader, Biloxi etc over the last many years is "lots" of flight hours per forward airframe and per pilot

But different countries have very different fleet sizing and through life management approaches.
 
When you say fleet size I assume you mean the total number of aircraft? I am unclear what averaging the total hours flown over this number actually tells us.
Yes. Total aircraft delivered minus write-offs and reached end of service life.

It’s the only way to get a sense of fleet usage and to compare flight hours across various aircraft types, despite some limitations. Ultimately most Air Forces operate under similar constraints and have to factor in cycling some aircraft through maintenance, upgrades & storage - so that problem is not unique to Typhoon operators.

For the USAF/USN for example, the most in-demand fleets fly ~280 hours/year (F-15E, F/A-18E/F, F/A-18C/D, EA-18G); the older F-15C/D and F-16C/D fleets around 240-250hrs; the F-35 and F-22 fleets are lower at ~150-180hrs due to sustainment issues (the above are lifetime fleet averages). https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-21-101sp.pdf
 
Technically July the 13th is 7.5 months and not 6 (half a year as per your calculation).
Technically also, December 2020 is 30 days from January 2021.
Hence it's not 1.5 years but 1 month + 12 months + 7 months and a half.
Hence one year and 8.5 months... Hence 180 hrs per airframe ;)

Maths Maths Maths.
Please :

January + February + March + April + May + June = 6 months !!!!!! July ist the 7th month on the year !!!!!!!!
Even with "your" accounts, at this stage, it can only be 6.5, never 7.5 !!!!!!


Edit : H_K has already answered for the rest.


Anyway, for France, at least from 4 March 2021, the figures are known and have already been given in this topic:



According to the minarm, the Rafale Air fleet flies 23,000 hours per year (23 000 / 102 = 225 h), and the Marine fleet, 9,000 (9 000 / 41 = 219).
 
Last edited:
@Deltafan is pretty spot on. “Dec 2020” means “Dec 31st 2020”. So we’re talking 18 months.

246 Rafales is the total delivered as of June 30th 2022. It’s not the average fleet over the time period, which was 227 Rafales… should be obvious why you can’t divide by 246.

146,000 hrs / 2 engines / 227 aircraft / 1.5 years = 215 hours per year
Thanks H_K.

The difference between your number of Rafale delivered (246) and mine (245 "flying") is a Rafale M used for static tests. He does not fly.
 
@Deltafan I’m fairly sure that static test airframe isn’t counted in the 246 deliveries (152 France including 58 Bs, 48 Cs and 46 Ms; 24 Egypt; 30 Qatar; 33 India as of Dec 2021 + 7 exports delivered in H1 2022)
 
It’s the only way to get a sense of fleet usage and to compare flight hours across various aircraft types, despite some limitations. Ultimately most Air Forces operate under similar constraints and have to factor in cycling some aircraft through maintenance, upgrades & storage - so that problem is not unique to Typhoon operators.
Overall fleet usage yes but I don't see comparisons between aircraft types across different air forces being correct.

Some air forces don't buy attrition replacements at all. Do France have any attrition / fatigue replacements in their fleet currently? Aren't these some of the airframes sold and they are getting the replacements in future?
 
India is looking at setting a new large program for new engines across a large swash of their programs.
Too much honey can turn the head of even the largest bears(?).
Technically July the 13th is 7.5 months and not 6 (half a year as per your calculation).
Technically also, December 2020 is 30 days from January 2021.
Hence it's not 1.5 years but 1 month + 12 months + 7 months and a half.
Hence one year and 8.5 months... Hence 180 hrs per airframe ;)

Maths Maths Maths.
Please :

January + February + March + April + May + Juny = 6 months !!!!!! July ist the 7th month on the year !!!!!!!!
Even with "your" accounts, at this stage, it can only be 6.5, never 7.5 !!!!!!


Edit : H_K has already answered for the rest.


Anyway, for France, at least from 4 March 2021, the figures are known and have already been given in this topic:



According to the minarm, the Rafale Air fleet flies 23,000 hours per year (23 000 / 102 = 225 h), and the Marine fleet, 9,000 (9 000 / 41 = 219).
June is not July... Nor Juny. I honestly can't figure what you are trying to tell us.

Please Admins, let me Know if we are in one of those Soderberg movie where Julia got to play... Julia.

Best,

CallmeJuliaViP
 
@red admiral The French typically keep 80-90% of their aircraft in the forward fleet, with the other 10-20% in sustainment. In 2021 they stated that 10% of the Rafale fleet was sitting around in storage / awaiting spares, which is in line with the above.

Possibly one reason for such a small sustainment fleet is that Dassault aircraft typically don’t need fatigue replacements, as the typical 7,000-9,000 hour airframe life is sufficient for 30-40 years service at current usage rates. The attrition allowance can also be kept small as attrition is very low for modern types (and it helps that the Rafale production line will remain open for the next 10+ years so plenty of time to order spare aircraft).

Anyway there’s no doubt that Rafale operators are getting good value for money and their Rafales are flying, which can’t be said for all competing types (IMHO)… cough.
 
Last edited:
Anyway there’s no doubt that Rafale operators are getting good value for money and their Rafales are flying, which can’t be said for all competing types (IMHO)… cough.
That's exactly the sort of conclusion you can't draw from this comparison. Some countries do lots of flying, some don't, some have lots of fatigue replacements, some don't.

e.g. UK Typhoon fatigue/attrition fleet appears to be multiple times that of France for Rafale based on your numbers above. And it's this large precisely because many hours are planned to be / are being flown over the life of the fleet

There are many factors here which make comparing this data pretty meaningless. This is not the most interesting subject so I think I'll leave it there...
 
India is looking at setting a new large program for new engines across a large swash of their programs.
Too much honey can turn the head of even the largest bears(?).
Technically July the 13th is 7.5 months and not 6 (half a year as per your calculation).
Technically also, December 2020 is 30 days from January 2021.
Hence it's not 1.5 years but 1 month + 12 months + 7 months and a half.
Hence one year and 8.5 months... Hence 180 hrs per airframe ;)

Maths Maths Maths.
Please :

January + February + March + April + May + Juny = 6 months !!!!!! July ist the 7th month on the year !!!!!!!!
Even with "your" accounts, at this stage, it can only be 6.5, never 7.5 !!!!!!


Edit : H_K has already answered for the rest.


Anyway, for France, at least from 4 March 2021, the figures are known and have already been given in this topic:



According to the minarm, the Rafale Air fleet flies 23,000 hours per year (23 000 / 102 = 225 h), and the Marine fleet, 9,000 (9 000 / 41 = 219).
June is not July... Nor Juny. I honestly can't figure what you are trying to tell us.

Please Admins, let me Know if we are in one of those Soderberg movie where Julia got to play... Julia.

Best,

CallmeJuliaViP
OK, my English is bad. I never hid it.

But, obviously, you only found this bad excuse (Juny instead of June. But there's no mistake for July) to try to make people forget that your calculations were wrong (even if we start from December 1, 2020, until July 13, 2022, that's 19.5 months (12+7.5) and not 20.5 (12+8.5) as in your calculation. And I'm not even talking about your initial two years.).

And, once again, I let the forumers, in particular and above all the moderators, judge which of us was in the right... (even with my bad English).
 
Last edited:
@Deltafan I’m fairly sure that static test airframe isn’t counted in the 246 deliveries (152 France including 58 Bs, 48 Cs and 46 Ms; 24 Egypt; 30 Qatar; 33 India as of Dec 2021 + 7 exports delivered in H1 2022)
OK, we did not use the same criteria (see previous page).

Otherwise:
-if we don't count the M47 static test airframe, for the 152 France, as 5 (B316 + M18 + M22 + M24 + M25) crashed before 31.12.20 (the last on 02.07.12) we could even go down to 241 for the calculation over the period (but you have already given all the real elements above).
-AFAIK, the M47 will be returned to the Navy in 2029.
 
Last edited:


301950460_460196406137631_3985968753461933100_n.jpg
 

Part of the order for 42 Rafale, signed last February by Indonesia, has been put into effect, according to concordant sources. That's to say six Rafale out of the 42. Which means that the first installment was paid by Indonesia to Dassault Aviation. It was recently, as specified at La Tribune. Why only 6 out of 42? The Rafale contract in Indonesia is divided into two tranches, a first of six aircraft more or less financed (about 1.3 billion dollars), followed by another of 36 aircraft without any real budget. However, Rafale prices are indexed to an overall order of 42 aircraft.
As usual, to be confirmed (especially on the duration...)

@stealthflanker : any additional elements ?
 
@stealthflanker : any additional elements ?

Yeah. The contract was effective at Sept 9 this year. Initial payment was done. With expected arrival in 2026. Let' see if we will actually go ahead with rest of 42.

This is according to local news.



---
Feels like a good news. Tho this initial 6 will come without weapons, it's kinda strange maybe but that's just how things work here as we put weapons/equipment in separate tender. Same thing for our Su-27/30's.

Rafale will give some much needed boost and will be the 2nd aircraft with phased array in our airforce (beside KF-21 if we decided to actually buy the production version)
 
Theoretically, 42 Rafale ordered by France in 2023: 12 new, to replace the 12 used sold to Croatia, and 30 new already planned. Otherwise, 13 of the previous order of 27 ("4T2"), are to be delivered to the French Air Force in 2023.


(...)
the year 2023 will see significant arms orders for the Land, Air and Space Armies and the Navy, including equipment and a batch of Aster missiles. But the largest order will be for 42 Rafale.
The objective of providing the Air Force with 185 Rafale combat aircraft by 2030 is “a bare minimum” to accomplish its missions in an increasingly contested airspace, General Stéphane Mille declared last February. Chief of Staff of the Air and Space Force (CEMAAE).
(...)
13 Rafale delivered in 2023
(...)
 
@Deltafan is pretty spot on. “Dec 2020” means “Dec 31st 2020”. So we’re talking 18 months.

246 Rafales is the total delivered as of June 30th 2022. It’s not the average fleet over the time period, which was 227 Rafales… should be obvious why you can’t divide by 246.

146,000 hrs / 2 engines / 227 aircraft / 1.5 years = 215 hours per year
Well, we've got the official nbrs:

Quoi qu’il en soit, selon les normes édictées par l’Otan, un pilote de chasse doit effectuer un minimum de 180 heures de vol par an.

Or, un pilote de combat de l’AAE ne devrait voler que pendant 147 heures en 2023 [voire aussi en 2024], contre 162 heures en 2022. Les pilotes de transport ne sont pas mieux lotis, avec 189 heures prévues pour l’an prochain, alors que la norme Otan est de 320 heures.
***************////////******************

Be that as it may, according to the standards laid down by NATO, a fighter pilot must perform a minimum of 180 flight hours per year.

However, an AAE combat pilot is only expected to fly 147 hours in 2023 [or even in 2024], compared to 162 hours in 2022. Transport pilots are no better off, with 189 hours planned for the year next, while the NATO standard is 320 hours.

(notice also the drastic impact of offloading toward Dassault's foreign customers in-service airframe without much foreseen planning on AdlAE training).

So, who's got the facts true*?


*Call me Robin Maths!
 
Last edited:
@TomcatViP As you know, there is always more than 1 pilot per aircraft… so the aircraft fly more hours than the pilots. There is nothing incompatible with pilots flying 150 hours and aircraft flying 220-250 hours or more.

I’ll pull up the historical numbers on pilot flight hours in the French Air Force. This includes the Mirage fleet in the mix which is as large as the Rafale fleet and has its own operational challenges, so sometimes hard to draw conclusions about exactly what is driving down pilot hours.
 
Last edited:
Annual flight hours per fighter pilot (goal : 180 hours)

2013: 153 hours/pilot
2014: 157
2015: 154
2016: 163
2017: 164
2018: 161
2019: 159
2020: 152
2021: 161
2022: 162
2023 plan: 147
2024 plan: 161
2025 plan: 166

The blip in 2023 is linked to both Rafale and Mirage 2000 fleets (exports of used Rafales and retirement of Mirage 2000C RDIs).

Source: https://www.budget.gouv.fr/files/up...F/BG/PGM/178/FR_2023_PLF_BG_PGM_178_PERF.html
 
Last edited:
Annual flight hours per fighter pilot (goal : 180 hours)

2013: 153 hours/pilot
2014: 157
2015: 154
2016: 163
2017: 164
2018: 161
2019: 159
2020: 152
2021: 161
2022: 162
2023 plan: 147
2024 plan: 161
2025 plan: 166

The blip in 2023 is linked to both Rafale and Mirage 2000 fleets (exports of used Rafales and retirement of Mirage 2000C RDIs).

Source: https://www.budget.gouv.fr/files/up...F/BG/PGM/178/FR_2023_PLF_BG_PGM_178_PERF.html

Interesting how COVID didn’t have too big of an impact on flight hours.
 

The Indonesian Ministry of Finance has permitted the Indonesian Ministry of Defense to seek foreign loans of up to $3.9 billion to maintain the combat capabilities of the Indonesian Air Force. This authorisation applies to three proposals presented by the Ministry of Defense. According to a report that Jane’s Information Group published on November 15, 2022, two of these plans include the purchase of the second batch of 12 multirole Dassault Rafale fighters from France as well as a batch of 12 to 18 multirole Dassault Mirage 2000-5 fighters from the Qatari Air Force.

The programme’s major objective is to increase the number of Rafale combat aircraft in its inventory. After reaching a consensus with the Ministry of National Development Planning in September 2022, the Indonesian Ministry of Finance authorised a fresh credit line with a foreign lender of $2.9 billion to purchase a second batch of 12-18 Rafales.

Recall that on February 10, 2022, the Indonesian Ministry of Defense signed a contract with the French company Dassault Aviation to purchase 42 Rafale jets. This contract was made with Dassault Aviation. It is anticipated that this agreement will result in a total cost of $7 billion for the supplies, excluding the cost of any weaponry. Due to Indonesia’s limited access to liquid funds, this Rafale purchase agreement was split into three parts. The first part of the agreement included the purchase of six aircraft (for which a formal contract was also signed in February), the second part included the purchase of 12-18 units, and the third part included the purchase of 18-24 units.

(...)
 
At last, we get to know why French AdlAE has repeatedly flown their Rafale from their own territory, when asked to reinforce eastern NATO flanks with routine patrols.

A reality check for some

Lors d’un audition à l’Assemblée nationale, le chef d’état-major de l’armée de l’Air [CEMAAE], le général Stéphane Mille, a donné les raisons pour lesquelles les Mirage 2000-5 étaient jusqu’alors désignés pour être déployés dans les pays baltes.

« Nous veillons à ne pas user prématurément nos appareils, tout en prenant en compte les besoins exprimés par l’Otan. Concrètement, nous avons fait le choix, dans un premier temps, de maintenir les Rafale en métropole et de ne projeter que des Mirage 2000-5 à l’est de l’Europe. Pourquoi? Parce qu’un avion envoyé à l’extérieur est utilisé à 100 % pour cette mission. C’est par conséquent un avion qui nous manque pour la formation de nos pilotes alors que […] vingt-quatre de nos Rafale ont été cédés », a expliqué le CEMAAE.

Aussi, a-t-il continué, « dès lors qu’on nous demande moins de douze sorties par semaine, je préfère faire décoller les avions depuis la métropole, plutôt que de les déployer à l’Est ». Mais comme il s’agit de renforcer le dispositif de l’Otan sur son flanc oriental, le choix du Rafale s’est finalement imposé.
-----------------------//------------------------------------

During a hearing at the parliament, the Chief of Staff of the Air Force [CEMAAE], General Stéphane Mille, gave the reasons why the Mirage 2000-5s were until then designated for deployment in the Baltic countries.

“We are careful not to wear out our aircrafts prematurely, while taking into account the needs expressed by NATO. Concretely, we made the choice, initially, to maintain the Rafale in mainland France and to project only Mirage 2000-5 in Eastern Europe. Why? Because a plane sent out is used 100% for this mission. It is therefore an aircraft that we miss for the training of our pilots while […] twenty-four of our Rafales have been sold, ”explained the CEMAAE.

Also, he continued, "as soon as we are asked for less than twelve sorties per week, I prefer to launch those missions from the mainland, rather than deploying them in the East". But as it is a question of reinforcing the NATO device on its eastern flank, the choice of the Rafale was finally imposed.

 
Last edited:
Indian Navy opts for Rafale M


It's not over, Indian government is not Indian Navy.

It has not been reported when the Indian MoD will take the decision ad when the Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS) will clear the defence deal.
 
Indian Navy opts for Rafale M


It's not over, Indian government is not Indian Navy.

It has not been reported when the Indian MoD will take the decision ad when the Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS) will clear the defence deal.
not surprised.
makes the most logical sense as the AF already operates the Rafale as well
Also, some time ago I made an infographic of how the aircraft could fit on the elevators
and the Rafale could fit perfectly, although not much leeway, on those tiny vikrant elevators
F-18 was okay width wise, but length wise was a bit over, and may require being parked a bit diagonal on the lift or having the nose/rear stick out

still hoping to see a video of the Rafale doing a ski jump take off
 
Dassault Rafale "preselected" in Colombia


The Government of Colombia has pre-selected the French Dassault Rafale aircraft as its new supersonic fighter to replace the already obsolete Kfir aircraft currently used by the Colombian Air Force, as has been announced by the Presidency of the Republic and confirmed by the Minister of Defense, Iván Velásquez, in dialogue with a local radio station. Through a press release, the Government has explained that it is currently negotiating to acquire 16 new aircraft for an amount of 15 billion pesos (approximately 3,150 million dollars).

The administration headed by Gustavo Petro has wanted to make it clear that nothing has yet been signed and that it is a pre-selection in which the final details are still being negotiated. He also explained that proposals from Sweden, with the Saab Gripen, and from the United States, with the Lockheed Martin F-16, have also been evaluated.
However, from the Government they affirm that "so far, the Rafale aircraft proposal is the best option for the country in relation to price, efficiency and operability". In this sense, it was detailed that "one hour of flight of a Rafale plane is approximately 30% cheaper than the hour of flight of a Kfir, estimated at 89 million pesos" (18,700 dollars).

According to Velásquez, the first batch, if an agreement is finally reached, will be between three to five planes, for an amount of 678 million dollars, which will arrive in the country in 2023.

From the Presidency they affirmed that all the proposals studied include industrial compensation and technology and knowledge transfer
(...)
In addition, the Colombian government stressed that, if the purchase is completed, resources from (...) the acquired debt "will begin to be paid within five years."
(...)
 
Very much a surprise winner of the Colombian contest. Some of the reasons why the Rafale beat the F-16V, Gripen and Typhoon below…


The reasons for the selection of the Rafale by Colombia

Given the announcement of the pre-selection of the Dassault Rafale by the Colombian government to replace its IAI Kfir, we investigated a little more the reasons why Colombia’s preference changed in recent days from the F-16V Block 70 to the French fighter.

Negotiations for the replacement of the Kfir have been going on for ten years, having started in 2012, when requests for information were sent to the main companies, but Boeing and Dassault did not pay much attention because they believed that the Colombian Air Force (FAC) was not serious.

In 2013 manufacturers were visited, such as Boeing and Lockheed Martin in the US, Eurofighter, Dassault, the Russians that offered the MiG-35, and SAAB’s Gripen, while meetings were also held with various air forces, including Brazil.

In 2020, although there was no progress from a political point of view, the selection committee made different matrices, where the Typhoon won in all cases, and, at that time, Dassault began to pay attention to Colombia. The Typhoon's problem was high operating costs, so the F-16, then second, came to lead the selection. The F-16V was, for the FAC, “ the poor man’s F-35 ”.

However, the FAC argued that the electronic warfare systems that the air force's Kfirs have today are better than the ones offered by the factory F-16 Block 70 and Lockheed was not willing to change it, while the Python 5 missiles are better than the versions of Sidewinder offered and would not be allowed to integrate said missiles, nor the Derby nor the Spice bombs that the FAC possesses. The United States offered the F-16 only with Sidewinder and AMRAAM.


Although it was negotiated to generate a variant that integrates these systems and weapons, the FAC saw that a version that would be too specific would remain and the United States was very reluctant to go down that path. In addition, the financing was not in the best conditions and the United States also showed little openness to modifying it.

On the other hand, the FAC considered that the Gripen was not leading in any aspect, but rather, as an official who was part of the selection process explained, “was second in everything. The plane is having major integration problems in Brazil with its air-to-air and air-to-surface systems, which are not fully operational, they are in a kind of Beta version. These are problems that they do not say in public » he claimed, adding « the precision of the air-to-surface systems is not even similar to those used by the Kfir (Elbit), the F-16 and the F-35 ”.
Another problem with said plane, as reported by the FAC, is that the delivery time was very long,
since Brazil and Sweden would go first and then Colombia, and the program already has significant delays.

The Eurofighter, for its part, had the problem of costs and that it is complex to maintain. It's the real winner but a very expensive one, although, at the time, they argued that some of the Rafale's operating costs are higher.
The Colombian Air Force was targeting Tranche 3 of the Typhoon, but offers had only been made for used Tranche 1 and 2 Typhoons for immediate delivery, or else new aircraft, but with very long delivery periods. Financing costs were also higher than the rest.

Faced with this panorama of intransigence from the Americans and the high costs of the Eurofighter, in addition to the limitations of the Gripen, the French decided to bet big in the middle of 2022 and start by removing the end-user restrictions, which also existed on the Gripen and the Eurofighter. In addition, they agreed to offer the integration of the Meteor missile, but also to integrate the Derby, Phyton 5 and Spice bombs, making it the most capable of all. Only the restriction on the use of nuclear weapons remains.

In addition, having a naval version, the Rafale was born with anti-ship capacity, which makes it the most multirole of all. This aspect interests Colombia because of the crises it has had with Nicaragua and Venezuela.
France also stated that it can start delivering them in one year, the shortest term of all those offered. This is essential because Kfir will be decommissioned at the end of 2023, because the support contract with IAI has already ended this year, which withdrew its people from Colombia, so sustaining the planes becomes too complicated and expensive.

The French presented their new offer to the FAC, convincing the Selection Committee, despite the fact that it had been leaning towards the F-16. The committee then agreed with Dassault, who raised the issue with French Prime Minister Emanuel Macron, who has a good relationship with Colombian President Gustavo Petro, and they achieved the first step towards an agreement between the governments.

As indicated by the Selection Committee, they were convinced because they were able to solve multiple issues. On the one hand, the Rafale’s electronic warfare capacity is customizable and Colombia was given access to the database to be able to modify it. The Rafale can integrate Israeli weaponry, employment restrictions have been lifted, it has built-in anti-ship capability and has specific weapons for the Rafale and is combat proven. Another advantage is that, since it was designed to operate on aircraft carriers, it can operate on short runways, which the Typhoon and the F-16 cannot. This allows them to operate in places like Tres Esquinas, Grupo Aéreo del Oriente and San Andrés. Furthermore, it requires less logistical support and is more versatile to operate. They also highlighted that it is a more maneuverable aircraft with a better power-to-weight ratio, in addition to the fact that, among other factors, the Rafale has an AESA radar with better coverage than the F-16’s, as the F-16’s radar has a fixed antenna with only electronic scan while the Rafale’s radar antenna can move side to side. [NOTE: THIS IS CLEARLY INCORRECT]

The Kfir costs almost 18,000 dollars per flight hour, almost as much as the Eurofighter (it is expensive because there are almost no operators or spare parts or support). The Rafale ranges between 15,000 to 17,000, the Eurofighter from 19,000 to 21,000, the F-16 from 9,500 to 11,000, and the Gripen from 7,500 to 8,000.

Thus, the Rafale has operating costs equal to the Kfir, but with many more capabilities. As they explained, the Rafale consumes 35% less fuel per engine, which makes it more cost-efficient, especially in short missions and without using afterburner.

Regarding the funds, since 2017 the National Council for Economic and Social Policy (CONPES) issued the document that reserves the funds for the purchase, so it would not affect other resources, such as those generated by the tax reform.

Although the government highlights the offset conditions, the reality is that they all offered it and, according to the FAC, the scheme proposed by the Swedes was the best.
Thus, now it remains for the detailed negotiation of the terms of the agreement to be carried out and then the signing of a contract, which could take place in the first months of 2023.
 
Congrats to the Rafale. I remembered in the early 2000s up to the mid 2010s, so many people and media outlets were lamenting the lack of Rafale exports, and here we are today. the Rafale is a late bloomer and I think already surpassing Mirage 2000 total exports.
 
the Rafale is a late bloomer and I think already surpassing Mirage 2000 total exports

Yes indeed! This order will be the one that puts Rafale ahead of Mirage 2000 in total exports.

286 Mirage 2000s exported from 1984 thru 2007. (Not counting the 12 old Mirages flogged off on loan to Brazil)

vs.

248 Rafales exported from 2015 thru 2031, based on confirmed orders only. But this number should grow to 300 exports with the Indonesian follow-on orders (36 aircraft beyond the initial 6) and now this Colombian order (16 aircraft).
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom