Convair F-106 Projects

Pyrrhic victory

This is going to hurt
Joined
Jan 31, 2008
Messages
73
Reaction score
31
F-106 with a Stardard Missile derivative (Seekbat?)
 

Attachments

  • 106asat1.jpg
    106asat1.jpg
    58.4 KB · Views: 892
  • 106asat2.jpg
    106asat2.jpg
    73.6 KB · Views: 853

sferrin

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
14,732
Reaction score
3,699
Acutally that was an ASAT. Don't think they ever even flight tested it. (The picture names are a bit of a give away ;) )

"In 1971, with the demise of program 437 looming in the future, the Air Force proposed project SPIKE. SPIKE would use a non-nuclear missile launched from an F-106 fighter plane to destroy enemy satellites. The project had it's funding completely cut off in FY 1973. "

http://blizzard.rwic.und.edu/~nordlie/papers/asat.html

High Frontier: The U.S. Air Force and the Military Space Program

"In 1971, the air-launched ASAT concept re-emerged with a proposal for Project SPIKE. The concept featured an F-106 interceptor carrying a Standard Anti-radar Homing Missile with a small second stage and a terminal homing vehicle. (Sounds like SM-3 in configuration sans booster - 30 years earlier.) The ensemble incorporated a target seeker, horizon sensors and an on-board computer. The payload could be either a small nuclear or high-explosive warhead, or a photographic package. Although SPIKE was not developed, it established the basic design features that would be used."
 

sferrin

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
14,732
Reaction score
3,699
[edit - deleted post - Admin]

Seeing how they were both based on Standard ARM so they'd resemble each other it could be related to either or both. The top picture shows a bank of cameras mounted under the F-106 for filming seperation. The paint scheme resembles Standard ARM the most so it's likely they just pulled one of those off the shelf for the testing.
 

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
28,551
Reaction score
6,291
My dears,

can we consider this drawing as a project to F-106 with camber wing ?.
http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19710064984_1971064984.pdf
 

Attachments

  • untitle.JPG
    untitle.JPG
    47.3 KB · Views: 794

Michel Van

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2007
Messages
5,461
Reaction score
2,661
intresting

F-106 with 2 engine
and a Bomber wen this stick under plane is a B-61 nuke
 

dickie

ACCESS: Restricted
Joined
May 3, 2007
Messages
46
Reaction score
4
head-on view of the second drawing is reminiscent of the Kingfish :p
 

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
28,551
Reaction score
6,291
Is this a real project ?
http://www.lorrey.biz/x-106/conversion.html
 

Attachments

  • x-106.JPG
    x-106.JPG
    74.9 KB · Views: 1,274

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
28,551
Reaction score
6,291
Matej said:
What about this one? With three engines (!), but not any info available :(

May be,it help.
http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19710009891_1971009891.pdf
 

Attachments

  • F-106.JPG
    F-106.JPG
    73.8 KB · Views: 864

SOC

I look at pictures all day
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2006
Messages
1,223
Reaction score
100
Michel Van said:
and a Bomber wen this stick under plane is a B-61 nuke

Nope, that'd be an AGM-69.
 

Colonial-Marine

Fighting the UAV mafia.
Joined
Oct 5, 2009
Messages
782
Reaction score
135
Regarding the F-106E/F and F-106X I am trying to understand the differences and origins.

The F-106X was the "ultimate" development of the interceptor including redesigned intakes, canards, new engines, a larger radome housing a much more capable radar, avionics upgrades, and capability to launch new AAMs. This was proposed as an alternative to the F-12 .

The F-106E/F was a final proposal by Convair after the F-12 was canceled and utilized the same airframe as the F-106A/B, but with an improved radar, avionics, and AIM-47 capability. Proposed alongside a version of the F-14 for the USAF and the A-5 derived NR-349.
 

elmayerle

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2006
Messages
1,444
Reaction score
327
ISTR that the Detail and Scale book on the F-106 included details on the F-106C/D and E/F efforts as well as a study on fitting the F-15's radar and fire control.
 

Stargazer2006

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2009
Messages
13,221
Reaction score
860
elmayerle said:
ISTR that the Detail and Scale book on the F-106 included details on the F-106C/D and E/F efforts as well as a study on fitting the F-15's radar and fire control.

Not so. Just checked and it's only the F-106A and F-106B. No extras...
 

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,304
Reaction score
1,884
...
 

Attachments

  • F106x[2].jpg
    F106x[2].jpg
    971.3 KB · Views: 857

Orionblamblam

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2006
Messages
8,971
Reaction score
3,504
Website
www.aerospaceprojectsreview.com
Advanced F-106
Quoting from my own blog:

A 1956 concept for a derivative/modification of the Convair F-106, equipped with canards, entirely new inlets, a noticably larger nose (housing a larger 40" radar), an infra-red seeker at the top of the vertical fin and a weapons load of a single massive Convair "Sky Scorcher" missile. The idea seems to have been that the Soviets would sends waves of supersonic bombers tightly packed into groups which could be blasted out of the sky with two-megaton-yield nuclear air-to-air missiles.

Not much seems to be publicly known about the "Sky Scorcher." The drawing below depicting the missile may or may not be accurate in the details... no fins are shown, so either the depiction is vague and handwavy, or steering was accomplished by means of thrust vectoring or movable flaps on the aft conical flare. Also unclear is whether the missile was guided or not... normally you'd think that an air-to-air missiles, especially one witha nuclear warhead, would be guided to the target, but the one nuclear air-to-air missile that the US did field (the AIR-2 "Genie") was unguided. When you're chucking megaton nukes into large flocks of bombers, I guess precision isn't important.

The Sky Scorcher was a substantial missile. Weighing 3400 pounds, when launched at Mach 2/55,000 feet it could cover its 125 mile range in 200 seconds. For continental defence, a force of 80 Advanced F-106's would lob 14 Sky Scorcher missiles into the incoming waves of Soviet supersonic bombers, blasting some directly out of the sky, and forcing others to split off. The remaining bombers would be picked off by the remaining Advanced F-106s, which would carry a weapons load of four Falcon missiles and one Genie each.
If'n ya want the drawings of the Advanced F-106 and the Sky Scorcher, yer just gonna have to go look at my blog. Ya mooches.
http://up-ship.com/blog/
 

Attachments

  • Image95.jpg
    Image95.jpg
    226.2 KB · Views: 882

fightingirish

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2006
Messages
2,550
Reaction score
1,249
Hi folks,
just found 3 pictures at the at the SDASM Archives showing a wind-tunnel model of an advanced F-106.
4559821156_74325368f4.jpg

Link: http://www.flickr.com/photos/sdasmarchives/4559821156/in/photostream/
This project might be a F-106X predecessor. A model is shown and written about it in the book "American Secret Projects: Fighters & Interceptors 1945-1978".
index.php

Source: http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,2954.msg23920.html#msg23920
Unfortunatly I don't have a copy so far, so can someone please give me quick a short summary of text & picture caption?
Update Autumn 2011: I have now a copy, the real paperback, not a PDF. :D
Thanks in advance!
 

overscan (PaulMM)

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Messages
13,684
Reaction score
7,989
These appear to be shots of the F-106-30 single engine version dating to 1958, a J58 powered, canard equipped version to carry a Hughes 5082 pulse doppler radar and 2 GAR-9 Gross weight of 47,000lb.
.
 

Attachments

  • 4559821170_8523620a21_o.jpg
    4559821170_8523620a21_o.jpg
    25.1 KB · Views: 1,968
  • 4559821156_c83e4ea879_o.jpg
    4559821156_c83e4ea879_o.jpg
    22.1 KB · Views: 1,985
  • 4559821148_698bbb3c28_o.jpg
    4559821148_698bbb3c28_o.jpg
    23.5 KB · Views: 2,115

Triton

Donald McKelvy
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
9,715
Reaction score
1,047
Website
deeptowild.blogspot.com
EDIT: Artwork taken from The Unwanted Blog and removed

Lowther, Scott. "Advanced F-106/Sky Scorcher". The Unwanted Blog. November 13th, 2009.
http://up-ship.com/blog/?p=4514
 

famvburg

I really should change my personal text
Joined
Jul 24, 2011
Messages
364
Reaction score
26
I just recently got my copy of APR V3N2 which has an article about the F-106 transport version. A question that I didn't see an answer to in the article. Any idea if it was to be able to still carry drop tanks? My guess is that it would. I'm thinking of building a model of the "CF-106" or maybe it'd be "VF-106" & have it bare aluminum with maybe a white nose cone & white area over the pax compartment with SAC markings.
 

Basil

ACCESS: Secret
Joined
Aug 10, 2009
Messages
294
Reaction score
82
Orionblamblam,
in your post from November 06, 2008 ("Now *these* are F-106 projects") you show three F-106 concepts. I am especially interested in the middle one which is not mentioned in Tony Buttler´s book (American Secret Projects - Fighters). Do you have additional informations regarding this one? Is it covered in one of your Aerospace Project Reviews?
 

XP67_Moonbat

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Jan 16, 2008
Messages
2,174
Reaction score
131

Attachments

  • F-106%20Non-axisymmetric%20Nozzle%20Flight%20Research-3[1].png
    F-106%20Non-axisymmetric%20Nozzle%20Flight%20Research-3[1].png
    63.6 KB · Views: 1,365
  • F-106%20Non-axisymmetric%20Nozzle%20Flight%20Research-4[1].png
    F-106%20Non-axisymmetric%20Nozzle%20Flight%20Research-4[1].png
    76.2 KB · Views: 326
  • F-106%20Non-axisymmetric%20Nozzle%20Flight%20Research-5[1].png
    F-106%20Non-axisymmetric%20Nozzle%20Flight%20Research-5[1].png
    76 KB · Views: 379

XP67_Moonbat

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Jan 16, 2008
Messages
2,174
Reaction score
131
FEASIBILITY STUDY OF AN F-106 AIRCRAFT FOR NONAXISYMMETRIC NOZZLE FLIGHT RESEARCH

http://www.f-106deltadart.com/nasa/Airbreathing%20Propulsion/Feasibility%20Study%20F-106%20Non-axisymmetric%20Nozzle%20Flight%20Research.pdf
 

XP67_Moonbat

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Jan 16, 2008
Messages
2,174
Reaction score
131
It's in Japanese. But it's where I found these.

http://www.afwing.com/intro/f102/f102-13.htm
 

Attachments

  • f-106d.jpg
    f-106d.jpg
    32 KB · Views: 398
  • clear-radome.jpg
    clear-radome.jpg
    42.5 KB · Views: 343
  • f-106c.jpg
    f-106c.jpg
    27.4 KB · Views: 433
  • f106x.jpg
    f106x.jpg
    177.7 KB · Views: 408

circle-5

ACCESS: Top Secret
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
May 31, 2009
Messages
1,158
Reaction score
233
XP67_Moonbat said:
It's in Japanese. But it's where I found these.

http://www.afwing.com/intro/f102/f102-13.htm

Huh... These are photos of an F-102B engineering model in my collection, that I took many years ago. Didn't know they were "out there".

The model is interesting, in that it can be arranged into mission-specific configurations, including photo-recon, etc. The Genie missile is listed as a "Ding-Dong" on the parts inventory...
 

Attachments

  • Convair F-102B Crate 3.jpg
    Convair F-102B Crate 3.jpg
    159.8 KB · Views: 301
  • Convair F-102B Crate 4.jpg
    Convair F-102B Crate 4.jpg
    278.7 KB · Views: 344

LowObservable

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2006
Messages
2,232
Reaction score
269
Why was it named Ding Dong? The witch is dead? It melted the target?

It has nothing to do with the Hostess chocolate snack cake, which was introduced in 1967.
 

SOC

I look at pictures all day
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2006
Messages
1,223
Reaction score
100
Ding Dong was one of the codenames associated with Genie early on.

Although the correlation with a dead/melted target is pretty hilarious ;D
 

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
28,551
Reaction score
6,291
Hi,


from the book; Convair Deltas,the canard F-106.
 

Attachments

  • 61-0630.JPG
    61-0630.JPG
    28.8 KB · Views: 2,730

blackkite

Don't laugh, don't cry, don't even curse, but.....
Joined
May 31, 2007
Messages
8,081
Reaction score
4,273
Hi!
 

Attachments

  • 5f669929.jpg
    5f669929.jpg
    225.6 KB · Views: 2,530
  • 6e6aa970.jpg
    6e6aa970.jpg
    254.8 KB · Views: 2,404
  • dc67066b.jpg
    dc67066b.jpg
    1,005.2 KB · Views: 2,261
  • e1e9c17b.jpg
    e1e9c17b.jpg
    151.7 KB · Views: 1,954
  • e4d1a066.jpg
    e4d1a066.jpg
    19.2 KB · Views: 214
  • e6f40945.jpg
    e6f40945.jpg
    390.8 KB · Views: 320
  • ec82859a.jpg
    ec82859a.jpg
    33.4 KB · Views: 425
  • f6b6456b.jpg
    f6b6456b.jpg
    230.7 KB · Views: 384

fightingirish

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2006
Messages
2,550
Reaction score
1,249
Just uploaded today and fits well to blackkites posted pictures. :)
NASA 816 and NASA 616 Research Planes (Convair F-106)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6aRvER8TbM
This video is a compilation of three titles. The NASA 816 (Langley) and NASA 616 (Lewis and Langley) served as a research aircraft for NASA Langley Research Center and NASA Lewis, now Glenn Research Center, for 30 years.


The first clip show propulsion system research at Lewis between 1966 and 1979. This aircraft was eventually sent to NASA Langley and used for vortex flap research. That research at NASA Langley is covered in the third clip in a program which ran from 1986-1991.


The second clip is of storm hazard research at NASA Langley from 1979-1991. Although commonly referred to as the lightening strike program, the program actually covered much more.


For more on the F-106 research at NASA Langley, see http://crgis.ndc.nasa.gov/historic/F-106.


NASA Langley film #6544.
Source:
Code:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6aRvER8TbM
 

Similar threads

Top