Boeing Chinook Projects

TomcatViP said:
60 tuned Ch-47F for Germany:

breakingdefense.com

US clears $8.5 billion Chinook sale to Germany, skis included - Breaking Defense

The Boeing helicopters would come with a laundry list of additional systems, from electronic counter-measures and missile warning systems to skis and life rafts.
breakingdefense.com breakingdefense.com
Click to expand...

and Boeing has installed Maintenance Training Device for the H-47 at former Bitburg air base

https://twitter.com/x/status/1656728495702016011
View: https://twitter.com/boeingdefense/status/1656728495702016011?s=61&t=S3ZZSp5bvFyQavLM45JgpQ&fbclid=IwAR3Bt760vJMUZ4ziUx_Crh_Nl4mUJ_F_zIxI1FiCdOslM4GHo5eBGzveEJo



Though deal sitll not cut and dried

Germany – CH-47F Chinook Helicopters | Defense Security Cooperation Agency

www.dsca.mil www.dsca.mil

It is up to the Bundestag and Bundeswehr now

cheers
 
Quite a fearsome looking Chinook. I almost want to see it turned into a gunship like the ACH-47.
 
MH-47G is arguably the most high-tech helicopter on the planet with all of the new gear.
 
www.taiwannews.com.tw

China offers Taiwan colonel US$15 million to defect via CH-47 Chinook | Taiwan News | 2023-12-11 17:22:00

Spies claimed that if invasion begins, colonel's family would be given priority to evacuate as Thai overseas Chinese | 2023-12-11 17:22:00
www.taiwannews.com.tw www.taiwannews.com.tw
www.firstpost.com

Why China offered a Taiwan army pilot $15 million and ticket to Thailand?

Taiwanese pilot was approached by Chinese officers who asked him to fly a CH-47F Chinook helicopter to a Chinese aircraft carrier in the Taiwan Strait
www.firstpost.com www.firstpost.com
www.thedrive.com

Taiwanese Pilot Planned CH-47 Defection To China: Reports

As part of the plot, the pilot was also allegedly offered safe passage for his family to Thailand should a Chinese invasion of Taiwan occur.
www.thedrive.com www.thedrive.com
 
RavenOne said:
and here in UK, been approved for H-47ER purchase

www.forces.net

Military to get new Chinooks that can fly twice as far in £2bn deal with Boeing

The upgraded variants can carry up to 55 personnel or 10,000kg of cargo and can travel at speeds up to 200 miles per hour.
www.forces.net www.forces.net

cheers
Click to expand...
Worth saying that this is the same order that was first announced in 2021, but was subject to review and much speculation last year - allegedly with Ben Wallace almost cancelling the order as being bad value for money. Interesting to see the added value in today’s release.
 
Interesting to read also that the order is needed to offset the loss in capacity from Hercules retirement.

The logic in that escapes me.
 
TomcatViP said:
Interesting to read also that the order is needed to offset the loss in capacity from Hercules retirement.

The logic in that escapes me.
Click to expand...
The argument will be that the continued operation of 1/2 of the Hercules fleet was primarily for special forces mobility. This buy is meant to be SF optimised, hence going for the long range fuel tanks to give something akin to a MH47-lite.
 
MH-47 is a great Special Forces platform. It can fly even greater distances with air refueling (usually provided by *cough* C-130). It can fly great distances at 150 knots. So, it isn't going long distances fast. If it is in theater, not sure there is a better platform. If you have to fly from, say Mildenhall to Niger to rescue humanitarian assistance folks you might want to use a C-130 or CV-22B. I don't say this to be critical of the decision taken on by the UK to buy Chinook for SOF operations, but more the decisions to retire all C-130. A400 is also a great aircraft but I suspect bit harder to maintain and certify the "normal" amount of special gear that usually ends up bolted onto Special Purpose aircraft.
 
Yes, none of them are substitute to the other. That's why it doesn't make much sense. You need C-130 and Chinooks.

Brits should probably have rejoined the joint C-130 Squadron with German and French forces.
 
yasotay said:
MH-47 is a great Special Forces platform. It can fly even greater distances with air refueling (usually provided by *cough* C-130). It can fly great distances at 150 knots. So, it isn't going long distances fast. If it is in theater, not sure there is a better platform. If you have to fly from, say Mildenhall to Niger to rescue humanitarian assistance folks you might want to use a C-130 or CV-22B. I don't say this to be critical of the decision taken on by the UK to buy Chinook for SOF operations, but more the decisions to retire all C-130. A400 is also a great aircraft but I suspect bit harder to maintain and certify the "normal" amount of special gear that usually ends up bolted onto Special Purpose aircraft.
Click to expand...
-47G pilots have to manage their gross weight very carefully because all the extra mission equipment makes empty weight much higher than a -47F. For basic hauling, the -47Gs are not ideal; they really need upgraded engines and debugged Advanced Chinook Rotor Blades.
 
TomcatViP said:
The CH-47 was already tested with a set of wing mounted in the center fuselage and experiments showed that there was no advantages in term of efficiency (with in fact a significant loss during hover and slow speed flight). thanks to the tandem rotors having overlapping discs. See Boeing BV-347


Boeing-347-2-600x304.jpg


Source (picture):
disneo-art.com
Source (History):
Click to expand...

and Piasecki proposal

Piasecki Refreshes Hybrid Chinook Concept | Aviation Week Network

In 2008 Piasecki and Boeing revealed they had worked together on a “minimum” modification of the Chinook, called the Tilt Duct CH-47.
aviationweek.com aviationweek.com

piasecki_chinook.jpg

cheers
 
jaabdad said:
-47G pilots have to manage their gross weight very carefully because all the extra mission equipment makes empty weight much higher than a -47F. For basic hauling, the -47Gs are not ideal; they really need upgraded engines and debugged Advanced Chinook Rotor Blades.
Click to expand...
Fill me in on debugged Advanced Chinook Rotor Blades. What are the issues?

Thanks - Mark
 
I always wonder, why the front set of wheels are dual configuration, while the rear are single wheels ....
 
Regarding Piasecki proposal, how does it stand structurally? is there a carry through main spar acting as a pivot (tube?) crossing the cabin? I mean, I would have understood if the wing was low mounted but there?!!
 
Weight. The CH47 series is near its structural design limit. More kit means less cargo. I am not sure what the Piasecki concept adds to the weight of the aircraft, but suspect it is considerable. So you could end up with a Chinook that can carry slightly more than a Blackhawk to a longer distance. Not sure that would be considered a wise move.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom