• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

BAe HOTOL

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,043
Reaction score
863
Early HOTOL configuration
 

Attachments

  • hotol84.jpg
    hotol84.jpg
    55.1 KB · Views: 1,216
  • EarlyHOTOL03.gif
    EarlyHOTOL03.gif
    106.7 KB · Views: 1,023
  • EarlyHOTOL02.gif
    EarlyHOTOL02.gif
    126.8 KB · Views: 987
  • hotol_85a.jpg
    hotol_85a.jpg
    27.7 KB · Views: 967

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,043
Reaction score
863
Early HOTOL - 2
 

Attachments

  • early-HOTOL2.jpg
    early-HOTOL2.jpg
    75.3 KB · Views: 900

Archibald

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2006
Messages
4,183
Reaction score
1,723
Is it true that HOTOL engine was classified after the cancellation of the project in 1988 ?
I can't understand if LACE and ACES technologies are mature or not. Is it possible to built a viable air liquefaction rocket-engine today or not ?
hope I understood well how the HOTOL engine worked...

Air coming from the intake was cooled (up to liquefaction point) using the hydrogen fuel. Oxygen was separated from the rest, went to the rocket engine and burned with the hydrogen fuel.
I'm not sure if the Oxygen was separated or not...
 

Golfus

Lo que diga Don Manué
Joined
Aug 19, 2006
Messages
44
Reaction score
3
You will love this:

http://sputnik.freehomepage.com/Models/HOTOLCutaway.jpg
 

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,043
Reaction score
863
Archibald said:
Is it true that HOTOL engine was classified after the cancellation of the project in 1988 ?

Rolls-Royce RB-545 Swallow engine, Alan Bond's creature, is still classified. My friend who has met BAe/RR HOTOL guys, says they admited that Bond is slightly cookoo (perhaps, as every genious person). 'How can you build an engine whose drawings are just in someone's head?'
 

Attachments

  • rb545.jpg
    rb545.jpg
    12.7 KB · Views: 259

Archibald

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2006
Messages
4,183
Reaction score
1,723
Lol! I already know this page, that's five years I browse the web for spaceplanes (I'm a great fan of these concepts)
I nearly put the link were I saw this cutaway... before realising it was the very same website :p
Flateric, france had the same roblem with René Leduc in the 50's... you're right about genius persons :)
 

Tophe

ACCESS: Top Secret
Joined
Feb 18, 2006
Messages
1,150
Reaction score
37
Website
cmeunier.chez-alice.fr
On your very first picture here above (Hotol84), what is the twin-fuselage plane in the sky background (with 6 jets)? A Twin-Hotol, somehow? Or just fantasy to add a science-fiction touch?
 

overscan (PaulMM)

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Messages
12,349
Reaction score
3,363
http://www.reactionengines.co.uk

Alan Bond and others now work on "Skylon", which is a son of HOTOL with a new engine derived from the same principles as RB-545. Without a large injection of money, the CGI images on this site are all that is likely to happen.
 

Archibald

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2006
Messages
4,183
Reaction score
1,723
Tophe said:
On your very first picture here above (Hotol84), what is the twin-fuselage plane in the sky background (with 6 jets)? A Twin-Hotol, somehow? Or just fantasy to add a science-fiction touch?

dear Tophe... I'm sure you noticed the twin-boom aircraft before the Hotol itself ;D ;)
 

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,043
Reaction score
863
Tophe said:
Or just fantasy to add a science-fiction touch?

Exactly, along with the FSW plane at the right corner...and HOTOL itself, in fact. BTW, looks pretty close to US Space Shuttle VIRTUS carrier aircraft proposal.
 

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
26,665
Reaction score
3,457
Hi,

the Skylon space aircraft project.
 

Attachments

  • Skylon2.jpg
    Skylon2.jpg
    11.8 KB · Views: 149

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
26,665
Reaction score
3,457
Hi,

the BAe HOTOL projects;
http://www.flightglobal.com/FlightPDFArchive/1988/1988%20-%200537.pdf
 

Attachments

  • HOTOL.JPG
    HOTOL.JPG
    27.3 KB · Views: 200

Michel Van

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2007
Messages
4,639
Reaction score
644
Here a cut view from Flight international by Tim Hall

sorry for big file size :-[
 

Attachments

  • HOTOLCutaway.jpg
    HOTOLCutaway.jpg
    394.7 KB · Views: 480

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,043
Reaction score
863
HOTOL patent (one of, at least)
Jettisonable aerodynamic control surfaces
http://www.google.com/patents?vid=USPAT5150858
 

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,043
Reaction score
863
Excerpts from the wonderful BAe/RR brochure on HOTOL issued ca 1986
 

Attachments

  • HOTOL_09.jpg
    HOTOL_09.jpg
    156.3 KB · Views: 243
  • HOTOL_08.jpg
    HOTOL_08.jpg
    207.4 KB · Views: 307
  • HOTOL_07.jpg
    HOTOL_07.jpg
    204.8 KB · Views: 264
  • HOTOL_06.jpg
    HOTOL_06.jpg
    243.1 KB · Views: 356
  • HOTOL_05.jpg
    HOTOL_05.jpg
    256.9 KB · Views: 374
  • HOTOL_04.jpg
    HOTOL_04.jpg
    152.1 KB · Views: 401
  • HOTOL_03.jpg
    HOTOL_03.jpg
    121.3 KB · Views: 453
  • HOTOL_02.jpg
    HOTOL_02.jpg
    160.2 KB · Views: 426

Rickshaw

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
2,023
Reaction score
106
Barrington Bond said:
Looks like a rudder just at the front instead ::)

Regards,
Barry

Thank you Captain Obvious. ::)

I was asking why it was at the front, rather than the arse, like every other aircraft. ::)
 

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,043
Reaction score
863
To save weight and improve maneuvrability for a long-fuselage vehicle.
 

zen

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2007
Messages
2,002
Reaction score
703
Particularly on approach for landing when the nose is high and tends to blank off a short fin at the rear. Placing it up front means a smaller fin can exert a similar lateral force to a larger fin at the rear, since its not blanked off and in 'clean' (undisturbed) air.
 

Simon666

ACCESS: Confidential
Joined
May 9, 2007
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
zen said:
Particularly on approach for landing when the nose is high and tends to blank off a short fin at the rear. Placing it up front means a smaller fin can exert a similar lateral force to a larger fin at the rear, since its not blanked off and in 'clean' (undisturbed) air.
I thought it was mostly because the center of gravity was so far back on HOTOL so with a fin up front you have a larger moment arm so you need a smaller force to have the same moment. A smaller force equals a smaller fin equals a lot less weight. But the blanking plays too I guess.
 

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,043
Reaction score
863
You never know what can you find in 1986 backissue of French edition of Penthouse...
This is very early 1986 HOTOL iteration, with nice photos from Warton wind tunnel and fascinating renderings including one with trolley.
Manned payload module is also here.
 

Attachments

  • hot_06sm.jpg
    hot_06sm.jpg
    70.3 KB · Views: 268
  • hot_05sm.jpg
    hot_05sm.jpg
    75.9 KB · Views: 171
  • hot_02sm.jpg
    hot_02sm.jpg
    52.6 KB · Views: 133
  • hot_04sm.jpg
    hot_04sm.jpg
    57.1 KB · Views: 126
  • hot_03sm.jpg
    hot_03sm.jpg
    55.3 KB · Views: 147
  • hot_01sm.jpg
    hot_01sm.jpg
    108.5 KB · Views: 140

SteveO

ACCESS: Secret
Joined
Jun 24, 2007
Messages
404
Reaction score
47
flateric said:
You never know what can you find in 1986 backissue of French edition of Penthouse...
This is very early 1986 HOTOL iteration, with nice photos from Warton wind tunnel and fascinating renderings including one with trolley.
Manned payload module is also here.
;D nice find! I'll have to check out my old porno mags now.
 

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,043
Reaction score
863
Again, very early HOTOL iteration model photo and flight profile - this time from Popular Science
 

Attachments

  • HOTOL_PM_1.jpg
    HOTOL_PM_1.jpg
    74.6 KB · Views: 119
  • HOTOL_PM_2.jpg
    HOTOL_PM_2.jpg
    189.4 KB · Views: 149

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,043
Reaction score
863
'Fat' HOTOL iteration ca.1986-1988
 

Attachments

  • HOTOL_89_04.jpg
    HOTOL_89_04.jpg
    31.7 KB · Views: 95
  • HOTOL_89_03.jpg
    HOTOL_89_03.jpg
    61 KB · Views: 95
  • HOTOL_89_02.jpg
    HOTOL_89_02.jpg
    129.2 KB · Views: 80
  • HOTOL_89_01.jpg
    HOTOL_89_01.jpg
    110.9 KB · Views: 78

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,043
Reaction score
863
Actually, this is only Penthause I ever had, bought on eBay for this article =)
 

sferrin

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
13,372
Reaction score
1,409
flateric said:
Actually, this is only Penthause I ever had, bought on eBay for this article =)

Not sure what would be worse, that you're trying to use it as an excuse or that it's the truth. ;D
 

overscan (PaulMM)

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Messages
12,349
Reaction score
3,363
Early config
 

Attachments

  • Hotol-5.jpg
    Hotol-5.jpg
    93.4 KB · Views: 56
  • Hotol-4.jpg
    Hotol-4.jpg
    129.7 KB · Views: 52
  • Hotol-3.jpg
    Hotol-3.jpg
    45.4 KB · Views: 45
  • Hotol-2.jpg
    Hotol-2.jpg
    83.4 KB · Views: 444
  • Hotol-1.jpg
    Hotol-1.jpg
    131.7 KB · Views: 447

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,043
Reaction score
863
http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2009/02/23/322955/secret-files-reveal-us-interest-in-uk-hotol-spaceplane.html

DATE:23/02/09

SOURCE:Flight International

Secret files reveal US interest in UK HOTOL spaceplane
By Rob Coppinger

As the first UK-funded launcher technology programme in 22 years begins, Flightglobal.com can reveal secret US government interest in the British Aerospace 1980s' HOTOL spaceplane - and the reasons behind that reusable rocket's cancellation.
On 19 February this year Reaction Engines, a company formed by HOTOL veterans, announced a £6 million ($8.7 million) technology programme supported by about £1.2 million of European Space Agency funding, which includes UK government monies.

The programme is to investigate a heat exchanger, an oxidiser cooled combustion chamber and an adaptive nozzle, all of which are technologies that were key to the horizontal take-off and landing HOTOL concept and are now planned for Reaction Engine's son-of-HOTOL spaceplane, called Skylon.
The HOTOL story goes back to August 1984 when BAe, the forerunner to today's BAE Systems, unveiled a satellite launcher concept that would see an unmanned automatic vehicle use runways of "Concorde length" to carry 7,000kg (15,400lb) to low Earth orbit in its 4.6m (15ft) diameter payload bay.
ESA's member states had been looking to replace its Ariane 4 launcher and the HOTOL announcement preceded the space agency's member states' 30-31 January 1985 ministerial meeting at which a decision was taken to start preparatory work on the expendable Ariane 5 rocket.
France had proposed its manned Hermes mini space shuttle, to be launched by Ariane 5. Then UK industry minister Geoffrey Pattie wrote to Treasury chief secretary Peter Rees on 25 February explaining how French diplomatic pressure had, perversely, won support for HOTOL: "[The French] were unsuccessful [in getting support for Hermes] and irritated most other member states, who then welcomed the opportunity to express interest in [HOTOL]." The meeting's communique asked the UK to keep the agency informed of HOTOL's progress.
In December 1984 a Department of Trade and Industry (now the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform) space branch memo, classified restricted, had reported German interest in HOTOL and French criticism that the spaceplane would burn up as it did not have Space Shuttle-like thermal tiles.

The memo said that BAe had answered this French criticism, but such was France's reaction that a handwritten note at the bottom of the memo says: "I think we must try to avoid appearing to rival or exclude the French in discussions with them."
The project was also attracting criticism at home, with the Rugby-based project management consultant David Andrews producing an eight-page critique. Written in December 1984 for Aerospace magazine, it was sent to the DTI's space branch director. Included in Andrews' criticisms of HOTOL was that the design was optimised for the ascent, but would extend the thermal loading on descent, due to too little drag.

And, more fundamentally, the vehicle offered no capability that was not already available. But this paper did not halt government interest in the project, and a handwritten note at the bottom of Andrews' letter to the DTI says that the criticisms had been answered by BAe.
In early 1985 HOTOL was a project with some European support. But as Pattie noted in his 25 February letter: "If the UK were to take the lead in a new launcher...it would be a major change in government policy." The stage was set for a vigorous discussion between departments on what HOTOL meant for spending.
The earliest evidence of US involvement came with a 4 March 1985 DTI memo to Treasury officials about a 1 March conversation between the memo's author, DTI space branch director Andrew Nicholas, and Frank Miles, who at that time was space correspondent for the UK's ITN service.

Nicholas reports that Miles claimed to know of ongoing HOTOL technology licensing negotiations between Rolls-Royce and US propulsion company Rocketdyne, now owned by Pratt & Whitney. This memo also reported that HOTOL had run into difficulties with the Ministry of Defence at a 28 February presentation.
This difficulty is echoed in comments in an April 1985 letter marked Secret UK Eyes Alpha from the MoD's research and development department deputy controller James Barnes to the Cabinet Office's chief scientific adviser, Sir Robin Nicholson.
Barnes wrote that there was no justification for developing a UK launcher capability and no defence requirement for HOTOL vehicles, adding that it would be unlikely to enter service until the 2020s and that the "engineering problems are considerable".

He did describe the HOTOL engine as "ingenious" and "based on a secret patent awarded to Alan Bond of the UK [Atomic Energy Authority] Culham Laboratory".
Despite this MoD resistance, later that month Pattie wrote to then-defence minister Michael Heseltine proposing a two-year £3 million (in 1985 money) public-private partnership proof of concept study with £1 million from government and the remainder divided between R-R and BAe. MoD support was key because the HOTOL engine had been classified and without the military's support the engines could not be developed.
Pattie also argued that the MoD could justify its spend on the basis of "strategic capability" and that rig tests of the key technologies of heat exchangers and combustion chambers could lead to international collaboration.

Heseltine's reply is not in the archive, but three papers from the released files have been kept classified under the UK's Freedom of Information Act exemption for "formulation of government policy".
By early July 1985 more problems for HOTOL had emerged. In a letter to the MoD's engines director general, R-R technical director Gordon Lewis says that R-R wanted the Royal Aircraft Establishment's (RAE) propulsion group involved and that the company would not invest its own money in HOTOL engine development. Yet for the £3 million programme, £1 million was supposedly coming from R-R.
The third quarter of 1985 saw work on the BAe/R-R two-year proof of concept study proposal and by November the case for US collaboration was getting stronger.

At an 8 November meeting between the RAE and the DTI's space branch it was reported that R-R now called its HOTOL engine Swallow and the company was seeking US ramjet data. R-R also expected to need US nozzle technology.
That month minutes of a conversation between then-prime minister Margaret Thatcher's minister without portfolio Lord Young and US president Ronald Reagan's science adviser George Keyworth were also sent to the DTI.

The minutes show that the USA was interested in collaborating on a hypersonic aircraft like HOTOL, that Pattie had attended a meeting in the USA for nations interested in such a project and that a "prototype could be flying as early as 1990".

But despite Keyworth's offer the UK government files show that neither the BAe or the MoD wanted US involvement, wary of the UK becoming too junior a partner while R-R saw a need for transatlantic co-operation.
In November 1985 an RAE assessment of the proof-of-concept study proposal was downbeat. The RAE thought that HOTOL would take up to 20 years to develop, not the 12 years BAe and R-R were proposing. It said there was a need for £750 million for the six-year definition phase based on a total project cost of £5 billion, in 1985 money.

It also said there was only £1.5 million pledged of the proposed two-year study's £2 million industry funding, with £1 million from BAe and £485,000 from R-R, and that an early decision was needed to ensure funding for a post-proof of concept, pre-definition phase feasibility study expected to cost £25 million.
Despite the two-year project proposal, the government knew that further European decisions on launchers would be taken in 1987. Full development of Ariane 5 was approved in November of 1987 and it flew successfully 10 years later.

In the first quarter of 1986 the UK government approved the two-year study, but by 1989 the future of HOTOL was looking bleak and France's Hermes mini shuttle eventually suffered the same fate and was cancelled.
In many respects the seeds for HOTOL's cancellation were sown at the beginning, with uneven support within UK government and its industrial partners, little prospect of European engagement and only the US government ready to embrace the project for its own ends.
 

Archibald

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2006
Messages
4,183
Reaction score
1,723
In many respects the seeds for HOTOL's cancellation were sown at the beginning, with uneven support within UK government and its industrial partners, little prospect of European engagement and only the US government ready to embrace the project for its own ends.

That, and the fact there was serious flaws in the concept...
 

PMN1

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2006
Messages
740
Reaction score
82
Stability was an issue which was realsied during the development of the configuration.

I asked the Reaction Engines people whather a Skylon layout using the RB545 would have helped, this is what they said.

The Skylon Configuration would have helped the HOTOL performance but I cannot be sure by how much, the new Sabre engine and structure concept both improved the performance probably more than the improved layout. However let me have a guess - the main impact of the configuration change would be to reduce the control surfaces and their hydraulics mass which would mean that HOTOL could get back to its orginal target payload of 7 tonnes.
 

flateric

ACCESS: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
9,043
Reaction score
863
interesting what was the destiny of all these cool HOTOL exibition and WT models...
 

Barrington Bond

ACCESS: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
May 4, 2007
Messages
929
Reaction score
80
Science Museum, London - just a small exhibit with a Skylon model and Sabre engine cutaway in the Space annex.
 

Attachments

  • DSCF3178.jpg
    DSCF3178.jpg
    121.5 KB · Views: 256

Triton

Donald McKelvy
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
9,719
Reaction score
498
Website
deeptowild.blogspot.com
Images of HOTOL and the Antonov An-225 with HOTOL.
 

Attachments

  • 0002754r.jpeg
    0002754r.jpeg
    33 KB · Views: 121
  • HOTOL_02.jpg
    HOTOL_02.jpg
    211.6 KB · Views: 144
  • an225-7.jpg
    an225-7.jpg
    28.2 KB · Views: 142
  • interim-hotol.jpg
    interim-hotol.jpg
    49.7 KB · Views: 102
  • hotol2.jpg
    hotol2.jpg
    24.6 KB · Views: 91

Similar threads

Top