This is exactly the idea was proposing a few posts ago. Makes more sense than it first appears. (except its not a fan but a compressor)
RR calls it a LiftFan.

But yes, I think if there's a burner under the thing it should be called a compressor.

The flip side of that is now you have a hot-gas pillar up by your inlets. And with all the comments in JSF/Harrier threads about hot gas ingestion suggest that is a really bad thing.
 
RR calls it a LiftFan.

But yes, I think if there's a burner under the thing it should be called a compressor.

The flip side of that is now you have a hot-gas pillar up by your inlets. And with all the comments in JSF/Harrier threads about hot gas ingestion suggest that is a really bad thing.
What If it’s a VTOL striker with inlets on the top, then you wouldn’t have to worry about the hot-gas ingestion. Attached photo is just an illustration of what I picture in my head.
 

Attachments

  • D9A5A51F-CCC8-4B10-BB5B-BA2C7CC275A2.png
    D9A5A51F-CCC8-4B10-BB5B-BA2C7CC275A2.png
    582.6 KB · Views: 25
What If it’s a VTOL striker with inlets on the top, then you wouldn’t have to worry about the hot-gas ingestion. Attached photo is just an illustration of what I picture in my head.
Maybe? I see how that could work, but it'd need full wind tunnel and/or CFD analysis to prove it.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom