- Joined
- 1 April 2006
- Messages
- 12,276
- Reaction score
- 15,087
First time AN/APS-154 container deployed seen publicly afair
https://t.me/bomber_fighter/22300
https://t.me/bomber_fighter/22300
It stands to reason that the empty pylon is likely capable of carrying a fourth. It's perfectly possible that it was carrying a fourth until shortly before that shot.I count 3 (only 1 on left wing and empty pylon).
That would almost be like what they tried to do with the 747 when they tried to convert that plane to a bomber when Nixon canclled the B-1A,
It is supposed to.Can LRASM fit in the weapons bay?
I wouldn't expect so. It seems to be quite a snug fit for lightweight torpedoes.Can LRASM fit in the weapons bay?
No way.Can LRASM fit in the weapons bay?
Almost certainly not. Diameter of Mk54 is <15”.Can LRASM fit in the weapons bay?
It is supposed to.
Fuselage pressure hull, you mean, but same effect.bay lenght is ~3,91 m / 12.83 ft
the other problem it's very shallow as integral tank above is protruding down parallel to OML
A Mk54 is about 9ft long, not including parachute pack. I think the LWT parachute pack is ~2ft long, so total package is 11ft.I wouldn't expect so. It seems to be quite a snug fit for lightweight torpedoes.
I mean what I mean. Integral fuel tank.Fuselage pressure hull, you mean, but same effect.
Almost certainly not. Diameter of Mk54 is <15”.
*checks mental map of fuel tanks versus bomb bay location*I mean what I mean. Integral fuel tank.
Thought you might like this, which I knocked up after seeing your photos.LAst week, we had pair of Navy Boeing P-8 Poseidon with Multi-Mission Pod AN/APS-154 arrive at RAF Mildenhall alas only got the second one last Thursday, from Sigonella so here are my photos below.
also received in the post from Fox-One, RAF P-9 poseidon Hawk Tuah patch lol
cheers
So upcoming P-8B?
Oh, god no, the USN has succumbed to USAF Block numbers! The horror!!!!No, just P-8A Increment 3.
Could be worse, could be V3.0, which I'm starting to notice on ground vehicles.Oh, god no, the USN has succumbed to USAF Block numbers! The horror!!!!
They've been using blocks for some time, e.g. SM-3 Block IIA.Oh, god no, the USN has succumbed to USAF Block numbers! The horror!!!!
Which then gets a nice normal new letter suffix in MDS as RIM-161D.They've been using blocks for some time, e.g. SM-3 Block IIA.
But that was gunners and the DOD bureaucracy, rather than the navy in general.They've been using blocks for some time, e.g. SM-3 Block IIA.
Oh, god no, the USN has succumbed to USAF Block numbers! The horror!!!!
Whereas USAF Blocks means that an F-16C Block 50 has enough different equipment from a Block 30 that the USN would have called it an F-16E.
Am I mistaken in remembering that the FA-18D was a fully combat capable ac from the beginning?Explain the two utterly different F/A-18Ds (the basic two-seat trainer and the Marine Corps' Night Attack version).
Am I mistaken in remembering that the FA-18D was a fully combat capable ac from the beginning?