• Hi Guest! Forum rules have been updated. All users please read here.

Tornado Projects

overscan (PaulMM)

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Messages
11,826
Reaction score
1,682
The original plans for the Tornado ADV included a LLTV mounted under the nose for long range target ID day or night, and an HMS.

Sources
Marconi builds Tornado LLTV system Flight International 2 Sept 1978 p730
Ferranti Develops Helmet Sight Flight International 21 Oct 1978 p1468
 

Pioneer

Seek out and close with the enemy
Senior Member
Joined
May 22, 2006
Messages
1,724
Reaction score
101
Need your help with Panavia Tornado 2000? proposal

A few years ago I was looking at an aviation magazine that had a brief blurb on a proposed Tornado 2000.
From what I can remember it was a proposal to increase the Tornado IDS limited range a more useful one, plus from memory it was to have an avionics update (and possibly some stealthier features).
The range increase was to be from insertion of fuselage plugs, before and after the wing box (i.e. Tornado F.3 style).

Does anyone have anything on this proposal?
Was it intended for the RAF? Or was it a proposal by the Panavia consortium?

I think an improved Tornado IDS of this proposed nature would be far more viable and marketable.
For as many times it has been proposed as an F-111 replacement for the RAAF, the existing Tornado IDS just doesn’t have the range, as far as I am concerned!

Regards
Pioneer
 

Thorvic

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2006
Messages
605
Reaction score
33
Re: Need your help with Panavia Tornado 2000? proposal

The main fuselage and wings remained the same with the forward fuselage being extended in similar manor to the F-3 but with a new faceted appearance rather than the traditional boxy shape. The intakes were also changed to a more stealthy shape.

Avionics were to be updated and may be a more multimode radar fitted. I think somebody posted images a couple of years ago on What-if.
 

Pioneer

Seek out and close with the enemy
Senior Member
Joined
May 22, 2006
Messages
1,724
Reaction score
101
Re: Need your help with Panavia Tornado 2000? proposal

Thanks Matej for the drawings

Regards
Pioneer
 

overscan (PaulMM)

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Messages
11,826
Reaction score
1,682
Re: Need your help with Panavia Tornado 2000? proposal

I posted the first image, its from Air Power 2000 by Michael J. Gething. The second scan is from WAPJ Magazine Tornado IDS Variant Briefing, I'm not sure of issue.
 

overscan (PaulMM)

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Messages
11,826
Reaction score
1,682
GAFAD (German Air Force Air Defence)

Post 1975, single seat Tornado possibly with fixed wing.

By 1980, a carbon fibre FSW design was being studied, giving reduced drag at transonic speeds

LVJ Tornado

1980 project. Tornado ADV fuselage with low set compound delta wing and short coupled canards on air intakes.

Super Tornado (Tornado International)

1987 proposal. Tornado ADV cleared for Sea Eagle, ALARM and bombs. Offered to export customers and RAF for Buccaneer replacement. Stopped in 1988.

Tornado J

1987 proposal to Japan's FS-X program. Based on ADV airframe with features from IDS and ECR.

Tornado ADV Upgrade

In 1988 an upgrade of ADV with AN/APG-65 radar and EJ200 engines was briefly considered.

Source:

World Air Power Journal 31 Winter 1997
 

Spinners

CLEARANCE: Restricted
Joined
Sep 21, 2006
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
overscan said:
Tornado ADV Upgrade

In 1988 an upgrade of ADV with AN/APG-65 radar and EJ200 engines was briefly considered.
You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.
 

boxkite

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2006
Messages
831
Reaction score
84
If anyone is looking for an artist's impression of the Tornado 2000, here is one from the "AIR International" May 1993 (pg 219)

Artist's impression of BAe's proposed Tornado 2000, designed to fulfil the requirements of ASR 425 for a new combat aircraft which would enter service in the second decade of the next century. Intended as an advanced, multi-role, low-level penetrator version of the Tornado, the aircraftwould feature increased range, reduced radar cross section, electronic warfare enhancements, additional reconnaissance systems and compability with future precision guided weapons.
 

Attachments

flateric

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
8,879
Reaction score
429
BAe ad from 1991 with something Tornado 2000 look-alike
 

Attachments

Matej

Multiuniversal creator
Joined
Feb 13, 2006
Messages
2,617
Reaction score
73
Website
www.hitechweb.genezis.eu
flateric said:
Tornado 2000 look-alike
The citation from the text in my reply no.3:

There have been suggestions that the Tornado 2000 also formed the basis of a "Long Range Penetrator", with an even more dramatically chined forward fuselage, a fixed, highly swept delta wing, and prominent LERXes. This aircraft would have retained the Tornado 2000's massive conformal tanks, with ASMs carried semi-conformally on its sides.
Coincidence? I don't think so.
 

Pioneer

Seek out and close with the enemy
Senior Member
Joined
May 22, 2006
Messages
1,724
Reaction score
101
I know this thread is a little old - but!

I found this in a copy of Pacific Defence Reporter, Feb 1981, Vol VII No.8

With the aeroplane now entering service, Panavia reports a very high degree of interest from a large number of potential export customers some of whom have a requirement for both capabilities within a single variant.

This to me was the biggest down fall of the Tornado potential in terms of export potential - two specialized types 'Strike/Interdiction/reconn' or 'Interceptor'. Panavia failed to produce a true all-round multi-role variant within the one plane! Panavia failed to deliver on what the market wanted!
Only the likes of the RAF and the RSAF could afford to field two specialized variants!
Potential lost!!!!

Just my 20-cents worth
My opinion based on Tornado F2 or F3 variant fuselage (offering improved range on internal fuel and more internal space for avionics), with Hughes APG-65 'true' multi-mode radar = great all-round multi-role fighter-bomber?


Regards
Pioneer
 

Jemiba

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2006
Messages
8,097
Reaction score
511
The Tornado wasn't designed with much fighter capabilities in mind and although the
F.2/F.3 seem to have been relatively succesful as a long range interceptor, that was a role
quite rarely needed in other nations. And when the Tornado appeared on the market, true
fighters already had to have as much agility, as possible, something it never could have achieved
in its basic configuration. So I don't think, that Panavias optimism in the market potential for
a more fighter-like version was really justified. In the RAF the Tornado was the true successor to
the Canberra and in the german airforce to the F-104G, which was developed as a bomber, too,
not as a fighter.
 

Gridlock

CLEARANCE: Secret
Joined
Aug 4, 2010
Messages
243
Reaction score
2
"In the summer of 1979 there was a snifdf of interest in the Tornado from the USAF. They were looking for an attack aircraft to fill the gap between the F-111 and the F-16, they wanted about 150 aeroplanes which could have been Tornados [...] had they bought it the British government would cancel the ADV and buy 165 2-seat F15s instead"


-- Mike Elsam
 

AndyG61

CLEARANCE: Restricted
Joined
Jun 29, 2011
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Realise this is an old thread, but .....

Some Tornado F3's were modified to carry 2 ALARM in place of the Skyflash, to provide a potential SEAD capability in Gulf War II; in the event they were not used, but XI Squadron operated them for a while, with the unofficial designation of EF3! The mod was also offered to the Saudi's, who displayed some interest as they were really not happy with the 'fighter' Tornado and it would have given them a more useful role - as far as is known this went no further, but the Saudi's are a secretive bunch, so who knows?
 

RavenOne

CLEARANCE: Secret
Joined
Jun 18, 2008
Messages
215
Reaction score
125
Gridlock said:
"In the summer of 1979 there was a snifdf of interest in the Tornado from the USAF. They were looking for an attack aircraft to fill the gap between the F-111 and the F-16, they wanted about 150 aeroplanes which could have been Tornados [...] had they bought it the British government would cancel the ADV and buy 165 2-seat F15s instead"


-- Mike Elsam
There was also a 'Wild Weasel' Tornado variant proposed of the ECR variant I believe as replacement for the F-4G :)
 

Grey Havoc

The path not taken.
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
10,171
Reaction score
796
RavenOne said:
Gridlock said:
"In the summer of 1979 there was a snifdf of interest in the Tornado from the USAF. They were looking for an attack aircraft to fill the gap between the F-111 and the F-16, they wanted about 150 aeroplanes which could have been Tornados [...] had they bought it the British government would cancel the ADV and buy 165 2-seat F15s instead"


-- Mike Elsam
There was also a 'Wild Weasel' Tornado variant proposed of the ECR variant I believe as replacement for the F-4G :)
I would say certain countries wish they had that version now in Libya.
 

alertken

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Joined
Jan 20, 2007
Messages
544
Reaction score
58
Can we find 1973 PanAp, an AlphaJet-niche single seat, cheap derivative, for Luftwaffe? This was a paper puff, as FIAT, BAC and MBB were happy to work together to sustain what had begun, May,1968, as a (maybe Dassault), Fokker, Sabca, 7 Nation/8 User programme of >1,000 units. But they were not enthusiastic to abandon other solo or (FIAT/Embraer AMX) bilateral schemes. The business structure of Panavia GmbH had no resources other than Project Office administration. So, no motive, no funds to perpetuate Tripartite collaboration.

In 1979 UK solo-funded BAe's EAP unstable canard concept; FRG, working in the same field, was willing to do it all again and decline US sirens (FRG was obliged to offset much $:DM pain in US Forces, Germany and the best way of doing that was to buy $ kit); Italy came on board a going concern; newly civilised Spain was welcomed: enter Typhoon. Product was Customer-led, where Mirage 2000N and Rafale were Supplier-led: EMD preferred 100% of some, rather than <40% of maybe many, maybe none. The French State apparatus went along with that and incurred very heavy expense. As they did throughout the Deterrent triad. Independence costs twice: in visible cash, and in what fine folk are not exporting because they are making solo-munitions. We do not embark on these things in order to sell them overseas: we do it for National Defence, and it is politicians' judgement whether solo is right (Rafale), collaboration(Typhoon),or off-the-shelf, as is import (AMD's customers; France - E-3F, E-2C). There's no absolute right way, because no State can do it all solo, guns and butter.
 

Jemiba

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Staff member
Top Contributor
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2006
Messages
8,097
Reaction score
511
Another photo of the Panavia 100 single seater models from Aviation Week, June 1969.
The strange shape of the intake just reflected the fact, that their configuration wasn't
determined then.
 

Attachments

Hood

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2006
Messages
1,516
Reaction score
527
Here is a picture of the Panavia-100 model from another angle in Brassey's Annual 1973.
 

Attachments

Grey Havoc

The path not taken.
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
10,171
Reaction score
796
PANAVIA PROPOSES 'TORNADO-J' FOR FS-X
Military Technology Exchanges Proposed

Tokyo AEROSPACE JAPAN-WEEKLY in English 23 Feb 87 pp 1, 2

[Text]
Panavia Aircraft announced at a press conference on
February 12 in London that the company proposed a plan to
develop a new version of its Tornado fighter aircraft
jointly with Japan for the FS-X next support fighter of the
Air Self-Defense Force (ASDF).

The proposed new aircraft called a "J" version is
modeled on the Tornado ADV aircraft which is currently
manufactured for the British Royal Air Force (RAF). The
proposal is aimed at developing jointly with Japan a new
fighter which will satisfy all requirements of ASDF. For
this purpose, Panavia has also proposed that an agreement on
military technology exchanges should be concluded between
Japan and Europe.

The FS-X options are now narrowed down to purchase of
off-the-shelf foreign aircraft (including Panavia Tornado,
General Dynamics F-16 and McDonnell Douglas F/A-18) and
development of new aircraft (either domestic development or
joint development with foreign manufacturers).

The joint development proposals of the U.S. have
recently been in the spot light. In the circumstances',
Panavia's joint development proposal is aimed at countering
the U.S. manufacturers.

Under the FS-X operational scenario, ASDF plans to
deploy new support fighters at Matsushima Air Base in Miyagi
Prefecture for attack operation against enemy fleets
approaching Hokkaido or the coast of Japan Sea.

In time of emergency, however, the FSX fighters may be
deployed down south at Hyakuri Air Base because even
Matsushima Air Base is too close to the front fine.

The FS-X will have to fly up to the east coast of Hokkaido
to attack enemy ships and return to the base. In some cases,
the fighters will have to perform air-to-air combat during their missions.

According to ASDF's requirements, the FS-X has to be armed with four
air-to-ship missiles (or six 500-pound guided bombs), two air-to-air
missiles and a 20mm machinegun (with 500 rounds). The Panavia Tornado
and the McDonnell Douglas F-15E dual-role fighter are the only aircraft
now available to satisfy such requirements and an operational scenario.

This is why Panavia has proposed a joint development of
the Tornado-J Although no details of the Tornado-J
proposal have been disclosed yet, Panavia is now attracting
much attention of the Japanese aircraft industry as well as
Asia's engineering staff who have been concerned about a
joint development with the U.S. only.

Europe believes that the FS-X is a good chance for
Japan to appeal its efforts of correcting the current trade
imbalance between Japan and Europe. If necessary, West.
Germany, the U.K. and ltaly will ask Prime Minister Yasuhiro
Nakasone for Japan's introduction of the Tornado at tne
coming Venice Economic Summit meeting in June.
Note: The guided bombs mentioned are likely to have primarily been GCS-1[MK 82] infrared-guided bombs intended for use against landing craft and the like.


http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a348059.pdf (pdf pages 54-55)
 

datafuser

CLEARANCE: Confidential
Joined
Dec 2, 2006
Messages
120
Reaction score
3
From The Economist, 4 July 1981.

BAe tried to get the Saudis interested in a lighter, single-seat Tornado without its VG wing.
 

Attachments

datafuser

CLEARANCE: Confidential
Joined
Dec 2, 2006
Messages
120
Reaction score
3
Thanks a lot for that.

Is there any drawing or artist's impression of the P.110 other than those in the Evolution of the Eurofighter Typhoon thread?
 

hesham

CLEARANCE: Above Top Secret
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
25,257
Reaction score
2,116
From the book;

Flugzeuge. 1000 Maschinen aus aller Welt mit sämtlichen technischen Daten. Vom ersten Fluggerät bis zum Überschalljet
 

Attachments

Grey Havoc

The path not taken.
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
10,171
Reaction score
796

BAe Test Pilot Keith Hartley undertaking not everyday’s test flight in 1988. This “cockpit habitability test” purpose was to evaluate if the Tornado pilot could operate efficiently after the departure of the canopy at speeds up to 500 knots.

He made it look so damn cool and easy.
 

Wyvern

CLEARANCE: Confidential
Joined
Jan 25, 2020
Messages
119
Reaction score
76
Great find! Imagine what it must have been like to be that pilot.

Also, does anyone have any information on the PANNAP (Panavia New Aircraft Project)? From the information given in Tony Buttler's "British Secret Projects 2: Jet Bombers Since 1949", these projects were made up of trainers, strike and air-superiority fighters. Does anybody have any documents or drawings on this type? Was the Panavia 100 related to it?

Thanks in advance,

Wyvern
 

Thorvic

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2006
Messages
605
Reaction score
33
The original plans for the Tornado ADV included a LLTV mounted under the nose for long range target ID day or night, and an HMS.

Sources
Marconi builds Tornado LLTV system Flight International 2 Sept 1978 p730
Ferranti Develops Helmet Sight Flight International 21 Oct 1978 p1468
20191016_200451.jpg20191016_200502.jpg20191016_200541.jpg

EAG 4898 as requested by Chris Gibson for SMW 2019 for the intended launch of Typhoon to Typhoon
 

scorp

CLEARANCE: Restricted
Joined
Mar 4, 2006
Messages
24
Reaction score
5
If the kit-bash posted last weekend is an early/proposed Tornado ADV, why was it painted dark green, and why is it depicted carrying bombs? Or am I misunderstanding something?
 

Aubi

CLEARANCE: Confidential
Joined
Aug 31, 2009
Messages
146
Reaction score
212
Website
www.armedconflicts.com
Because it is an attack variant.

A Tentative Fleet Plan said:
Another aircraft based upon the Air Defence Variant designed to meet AST.396. The blunt nose contains 26" diameter ball which itself contains a Laser Ranger and Marked Target Seeker (LRMTS) and FLIR. A Terrain-Following-Radar is carried in a fairing below the nose, whilst a LLLTV set (the Visual Augmentation System originally proposed for the ADV variant) is placed immediately forward of the windscreen in the upper nose.
 

CJGibson

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Senior Member
Joined
May 26, 2011
Messages
1,285
Reaction score
286
The ADV already had the extra fuel capacity (fin tank, fuselage extension), VAS ahead of cockpit and a gun bay wired for avionics. The intakes were fixed.

Anybody interested in a PTP on AST.396?

Chris
 

overscan (PaulMM)

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Messages
11,826
Reaction score
1,682
AST.396? Absolutely.

The stretched ADV version was also proposed for the Wild Weasel version I think.
 

archipeppe

CLEARANCE: Top Secret
Joined
Oct 18, 2007
Messages
1,601
Reaction score
134
I wonder if the ECR version for both Italian Air Force and Luftwaffe could be regarded as new version of its own or only a mere conversion...
 
Top