Tilt-cockpit VTOL tailsitter F-16 and F-17/F-18

hesham

ACCESS: USAP
Senior Member
Joined
26 May 2006
Messages
38,267
Reaction score
20,408
Hi,

who know this concept ?.
http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19750022036_1975022036.pdf
 

Attachments

  • VTOL F-16.JPG
    VTOL F-16.JPG
    16.1 KB · Views: 638
Re: Tilt-cockpit VTOL tailsitter F-16 and F-17

Interesting, thanks Hesham.

From the text, this model just seems to be testing the pivoting forebody as a possible way around the shortcomings of the X-13 Vertijet. The tailed-delta appears to have won out over the 'least mod' version of the F-16.

The 3-view (Fig.3) on page 19 shows more details of the airframe, reaction controls, etc. Attached is a more compact, reorganized version of that Figure.

BTW, for anyone interested in the LTV XC-142A, there's a drawing of the 'free flight' wind tunnel testing of that V/STOL aircraft on page 25.
 

Attachments

  • nasa-vtol-f16.jpg
    nasa-vtol-f16.jpg
    78.5 KB · Views: 624
Re: Tilt-cockpit VTOL tailsitter F-16 and F-17

Right Apophenia , it seems that this model haves nothing
to do with the F-16...
 
Re: Tilt-cockpit VTOL tailsitter F-16 and F-17

There was also F-18like model as well. I am sure that I posted the photo somewhere on the forum, but cant find currently where.
 
Re: Tilt-cockpit VTOL tailsitter F-16 and F-17

Looks like a GD take on the Grumman "Nutcracker" concept.
 
Re: Tilt-cockpit VTOL tailsitter F-16 and F-17

RTFNTR

The model used in the investigation was a modified version of an existing research model generally representative of current fighter configurations.

They just took spare model to make the tests.
 
Re: Tilt-cockpit VTOL tailsitter F-16 and F-17

The Convair Model 49 is reborn ! ;D

convair-49_1.gif
 
Re: Tilt-cockpit VTOL tailsitter F-16 and F-17

Well, Matej is right, but I couldn't find it, too.
Here it's again, from Aviation Week 1975, the F-16 was used
as basis, as well as the F-17.
 

Attachments

  • NASA-F16-F17-VTOL-2.JPG
    NASA-F16-F17-VTOL-2.JPG
    30.9 KB · Views: 578
Re: Tilt-cockpit VTOL tailsitter F-16 and F-17

Thanks Jens. Interesting to see the different pivot points chosen for the two models.

The same F-16 photos were reproduced in the NASA pdf but your AW&ST versions are of much better quality.
 
Re: Tilt-cockpit VTOL tailsitter F-16 and F-17

Hi,

and also from NASA reports,the F-16 and F-18;
http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19760003954_1976003954.pdf
http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19750022036_1975022036.pdf
 

Attachments

  • F-18 V-A.JPG
    F-18 V-A.JPG
    11.5 KB · Views: 233
  • F-18 vertical altitude.JPG
    F-18 vertical altitude.JPG
    18.4 KB · Views: 211
  • F-16 V-A.JPG
    F-16 V-A.JPG
    30.5 KB · Views: 272
Would they be designed as an ejection module rather than seat ??

Sorry, can't remember which production aircraft had this facility-- Well, except for the Valkyrie, with its pods.....
 
Those would all need pretty substantial power upgrades to be able to take off vertically. Even with the F100 engine. The F-16/79 doesn't have the power at all, even in afterburner.

I'll assume for simplicity that the pivoting-cockpit gear raised the empty weight to that of the F-16C. That means 18,900lbs empty. Let's assume that the mission is pure air defense. 2x AIM-9 and 2x AMRAAM, call it 1100lbs weapon load for 20,000lbs VTOL weight. Half a tank of fuel (3500lbs) puts us up to 23,500lbs takeoff weight, pilot and parachute adds another ~375 to bring us up to a total of 23,875lbs. The F100-PW-200 made 23,830lbs thrust in full afterburner, but had serious reliability issues. The actually reliable PW-220 made 23,770 and wasn't available until 1984.
 
Does anyone have access to the video of this thing in the wind tunnel? This is from the initial pdf at the start of this thread 1780961833718.png
 
Back
Top Bottom