French Minister of Defense confirms that France will pursue a French fighter and is looking to continue collaboration with Germany on the combat cloud. No mention of engines.

https://www.lemonde.fr/en/internati...ng-on-fighter-jet-through-2040_6754316_4.html
I would like to highlight the work of French industry —Dassault, Safran, Thales, and the entire ecosystem— because it is worth remembering that this is currently the only team in Europe capable of developing a fighter jet entirely autonomously.

The FCAS work has spanned eight years, with a €2.5 billion investment, 50% of which was sovereign development in France and 50% through partners. This means that virtually all of the investment to-date can be used to continue working towards a new fighter jet for the 2040 timeframe. This investment represents a major technical asset for our sovereign capability.

We will be able to pursue another element of the FCAS—connectivity—because it is the key to interoperability, and this aspect can be addressed within the framework of the Franco-German partnership.
 
Last edited:
my-disappointment.gif


View: https://x.com/GarethJennings3/status/2064356244555546825?s=20
 
https://aviationweek.com/defense/bu...rompts-call-continue-joint-engine-development
The companies are urging the governments to take the “necessary steps” to “preserve national expertise and industrial capability,” Pfander said.

Should there be a need for two different combat aircraft—one German, one French—then MTU has the comprehensive capabilities to support this, he said.

“Our current partners can meet the requirements of two aircraft models, and we are open to broader cooperation with other industrial partners in Europe,” he said.
MTU wants EUMET to continue. No surprise really.
 
Pistorius spelling out the options:
1. More F-35
2. Join EXISTING int’l program
3. Go national, under Airbus leadershipMentions a
4th option he does not want to talk about yet.

German media talks allot suddenly about fighter-bomber drone for Luftwaffe
Also that FCAS died do the high cost of 100 billion Euro, seemingly the Germans not wanted to pay that largely.

https://www.zeit.de/politik/ausland/2026-06/fcas-kampfjet-airbus-konsortium-ila-berlin

Source behind paywall :mad:
https://www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft...rohnen-a-13bf4567-2309-486f-bbe0-358467da461d
 
German ‘Team Gen 6’ Urges Future Fighter Decision This Year

BERLIN—Eight leading German defense and aerospace companies are urging their government to decide on the path forward for a future combat aircraft before year’s end to safeguard local industrial expertise following the demise of the Franco-German-Spanish New Generation Fighter program.

The contractual progress is required to meet Germany’s ambitious timeline of fielding a next-generation stealth fighter before 2040, argues the eight companies: Airbus, Autofly, Diehl, Hensoldt, Liebherr, MBDA, MTU Aero Engines, and Rhode & Schwarz.

“We can’t lose time,” the group said as it unveiled its position paper, signed June 11 on the sidelines of the ILA Berlin Air Show here.

The companies applauded the government for ending the stalled fighter program with France, noting it opens new pathways to developing a modern aircraft. They said “an efficient, new setup is essential” to achieve the desired results, a reflection of the frustration in the industrial setup of the prior program.

Germany has to take a leadership position, Team Gen 6 argues, while being open to multinational cooperation among like-minded countries. A sixth-generation fighter along with associated air capabilities will preserve the military’s ability to deter conflict and, should that fail, prevail in combat, they asserted.
 
Spanish news article highlighting how Spain has potentially lost its "equal partner" status now that it looks likely that Germany wants to lead its own FCAS.

Robles and Pistorius are negotiating in Brussels the sixth-generation fighter jet that is meant to replace the FCAS
https://www.escudodigital.com/defen...ta-generacion-que-debe-sustituir-al-fcas.html

From founding partner to guest
Two weeks ago, the FCAS program still existed . Spain joined that program in 2019, two years after Paris and Berlin founded it. It contributed money, industry, and got a seat at the table. The canceled fighter jet was valued at around €100 billion, and its first flight had already been delayed until 2029. What Spain loses with this withdrawal is not just an aircraft; it's the founding partner position it worked so hard to achieve.

The alternative has a name and a headquarters, and it's not Madrid. It's called Team Gen 6, and Airbus presented it at the ILA air show in Berlin . It brings together seven German companies (Diehl, Hensoldt, MBDA Deutschland, MTU, Rohde & Schwarz, Liebherr, and Autoflug) and six Spanish ones: Airbus Spain, Indra, GMV, Grupo Oesía, ITP Aero, and Sener, while Saab is considering joining. The initiative originated in Germany, and Spain is the guest of honor. France will continue on its own, and Germany and Spain, together, are starting anew.

That is the question on the table today, although no one is asking it aloud: whether Madrid is negotiating as a co-founder of a European program or as a participant in a German project . It's not the same to contribute a third of the funding and demand a third of the work as it is to join a framework already designed by someone else.

The engine problem
There remains the problem that the FCAS never solved and that the new program inherits intact: the engine . The powerplant of the canceled fighter relied on Safran and MTU. But without France, Safran is out of the equation, and the propulsion of the future aircraft would fall to MTU and the Spanish company ITP Aero. Whoever designs and manufactures that engine will determine how much real sovereignty Europe retains over its fighter, because a sixth-generation aircraft is no more autonomous than the engine that powers it.
 
Not sure where to put this with the death of FCAS.

France should lead future multinational fighter jet programme, Dassault says​

https://www.euractiv.com/news/franc...national-fighter-jet-programme-dassault-says/

The CEO of Dassault Aviation told French lawmakers on Wednesday that Paris should lead a future fighter jet programme, with other European industries contributing with specific competencies.

“I think that the leadership role for a next-generation fighter jet should be in France, regardless of Dassault,” Éric Trappier told senators on Wednesday.

The hearing came only a few weeks after France and Germany ended work on the Future Combat Air System (FCAS) fighter jet over leadership disagreements between the prime contractors – Dassault Aviation for France and Airbus Defence and Space for Germany.
 
Merz & Macron confirmed today that the FCAS Combat Cloud is moving ahead. Though the article hints at continued disagreements from industry on both sides.

"Super Rafale" vs. "Team Gen 6": Airbus and Dassault—life after FCAS
https://www.lesechos.fr/industrie-s...rbus-et-dassault-la-vie-apres-le-scaf-2242960
Airbus and the manufacturer of the French fighter jet have already moved on from the future fighter jet project. However, they remain at odds over the "combat cloud"—an element that Paris and Berlin confirmed on Friday they intend to keep as a joint Franco-German undertaking.
(...)
As for the "system of systems"—the digital cloud designed to enable aircraft and drones to collaborate via satellite, ground, and airborne networks—it remains a question mark. On Friday, Berlin and Paris reaffirmed their commitment to moving forward with it. "Cooperation is proceeding according to schedule," Emmanuel Macron replied. "The FCAS has never been just a fighter jet. The digital command-and-control aspect will be far more significant than a new aircraft. I am confident it will bear fruit," added German Chancellor Friedrich Merz.
(...)
German lawmakers are charting their own national path regarding cloud technology, although in theory this is positioned as being complementary to the approach taken for the FCAS program. On July 8, the Bundestag’s Budget Committee gave the green light to the "Combat Fighter System Nucleus" (CFSN) program—a sovereign "combat cloud." A €223 million contract was awarded to Helsing. This move has raised questions regarding its impact on Germany's relationship with France.
 
Last edited:
Safran is pulling out of the joint engine development which had survived the cancellation of the manned fighter saying the company only has the resources to develop one new engine. Rather than developing an engine for a 6th gen aircraft the company will focus its efforts on developing the M88-TREX for the Rafale F-5 which increases wet thrust from 7.5 tons to 9 tons in the same form factor at the cost of reduced fuel efficiency. They had been co-operating with MTU on the development of an engine for a future fighter with 11 tons of thrust.


https://www.aerotime.aero/articles/safran-french-fighter-engine-fcas-funding-ends

Safran has “the resources to develop only one combat aircraft engine,” Andriès said, adding that the company would prioritize the French roadmap. The CEO also questioned whether French and German engine specifications would remain aligned, describing the point as an open question.
 
Last edited:
Safran is pulling out of the joint engine development which had survived the cancellation of the manned fighter saying the company only has the resources to develop one new engine. Rather than developing an engine for a 6th gen aircraft the company will focus its efforts on developing the M88-TREX for the Rafale F-5 which increases wet thrust from 7.5 tons to 9 tons in the same form factor at the cost of reduced fuel efficiency. They had been co-operating with MTU on the development of an engine for a future fighter with 11 tons of thrust.
Your text commentary doesn't match news reports or the linked article and is factually incorrect.

Reuters had a much better summary:
www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/jet-engine-maker-safran-raises-targets-after-record-first-half-margin-2026-07-28/
Questions remain, however, over the future of Safran's fighter-engine joint venture with Germany's MTU Aero Engines after the collapse of a Franco-German-Spanish FCAS fighter. Andries said the venture, which sources say ⁠has operated smoothly in contrast to feuding that triggered the collapse of the fighter itself, is funded until September and its future will depend on paths each country takes in future developments.

Safran cannot commit to two entirely different next-generation military engines and will give ⁠priority to France's military development requirements, he added. Sources familiar with the matter say the engine venture is set to close with its engineers redeployed in the absence of new funding, unless France and Germany decide to develop two broadly similar planes, something most analysts now consider unlikely.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom