NASA Aircraft Projects

I think that's just a test set-up, the fuselage and tail look like the Avro Canada Jetliner . . .

Exactly, NASA modified that surplus C102 model a number of times. Why waste an already-built model's fuselage and tail when only the new wings need to be represented accurately in the wind tunnel tests?
 
From this report.
 

Attachments

  • 30.png
    30.png
    1.3 MB · Views: 50
  • 31.png
    31.png
    1.3 MB · Views: 32
  • 32.png
    32.png
    59.3 KB · Views: 27
  • 33.png
    33.png
    51.6 KB · Views: 21
  • 34.png
    34.png
    60.9 KB · Views: 21
  • 35.png
    35.png
    37.2 KB · Views: 23
  • 36.png
    36.png
    57.3 KB · Views: 27
  • 37.png
    37.png
    46.8 KB · Views: 30
  • 38.png
    38.png
    900.5 KB · Views: 30
  • 39.png
    39.png
    890.6 KB · Views: 23
  • 40.png
    40.png
    1.2 MB · Views: 18
  • 41.png
    41.png
    1.4 MB · Views: 18
  • 42.png
    42.png
    1.3 MB · Views: 21
  • 50.png
    50.png
    2.7 MB · Views: 29
It's very similar to Vertol project in the book, ASP:3 ?.
Don't forget that the technology here is the fan-in-wing "Vertifan", patented by Ryan Aeronautical, so it could be an early Ryan design (perhaps only notional, not an actual project) or a NASA drawing inspired by Ryan's "Vertifan" technology.
 
From this report.
Image 34, the short haul VTOL passenger jet - would be interested in seeing a cabin noise report/study when those clusters of lift jets were operating.
On the up side, cockpit security is perfectly inviolable.

Main engines are interesting, sort of like having a mini-Harrier under each wing.

34.png
 
From this report.
 

Attachments

  • 21.png
    21.png
    860.6 KB · Views: 8
  • 22.png
    22.png
    803 KB · Views: 10
  • 23.png
    23.png
    88.5 KB · Views: 10
  • 24.png
    24.png
    83.1 KB · Views: 11
  • 25.png
    25.png
    725.6 KB · Views: 11
From this report.
 

Attachments

  • 30.png
    30.png
    1.8 MB · Views: 6
  • 31.png
    31.png
    1.8 MB · Views: 6
  • 32.png
    32.png
    114.2 KB · Views: 10
  • 33.png
    33.png
    527.7 KB · Views: 8
  • 34.png
    34.png
    527.5 KB · Views: 10
  • 35.png
    35.png
    1.5 MB · Views: 13
From Army Aviation 1960/9,

I don't know if they were just a hypothetical designs,or may related to
a real concepts ?
 

Attachments

  • 20.png
    20.png
    459.5 KB · Views: 16
  • 21.png
    21.png
    502.8 KB · Views: 18
  • 22.png
    22.png
    444.2 KB · Views: 17

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom